1. Introduction

Morocco's child-care system is based on a distinction between adoption that creates a legal parent-child relationship and kafala, a legal arrangement for the care, protection, education, and maintenance of a child.

Moroccan law generally prohibits adoption in the sense of creating adoptive filiation. Instead, it recognizes kafala as a means of providing a family environment for children who qualify as abandoned under the law. This arrangement is especially important for children who have lost parental care, have unknown parents, or lack adequate parental protection.

The principal legislation is:

Family Code (Moudawana), Article 149: Adoption has no legal effect in creating filiation.

Law No. 15-01 of 2002: Regulates kafala for abandoned children.

Law No. 70-03: Promulgates the Moroccan Family Code.

Constitution of 2011: Provides a broader framework for judicial protection and fundamental rights.

Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC): Establishes international standards concerning children's welfare, protection, identity, and family life.

The Moroccan framework combines family law, guardianship, social protection, judicial supervision, and international private law. Its central challenge is to provide stable care for children while preserving their legal identity and complying with the country's rules on parentage and inheritance.

Ma Loi

+2

2. Legal distinction between adoption and kafala

Adoption (tabannī)

Adoption intended to create a legal parent-child relationship is not recognized under Article 149 of the Moroccan Family Code. It does not create adoptive filiation or automatically confer the legal consequences associated with biological parentage.

Kafala

Kafala places responsibility for the child's care, upbringing, education, and maintenance on an approved caregiver or institution. It establishes a legally supervised care arrangement, not an adoptive parent-child relationship.

Article 2 of Law No. 15-01 expressly provides that kafala does not establish filiation or inheritance rights. The caregiver is therefore not automatically treated as the child's legal parent for all purposes.

Ma Loi

+1

Why does Morocco distinguish the two?

The distinction preserves the legal rules governing parentage, family identity, and succession while allowing a child to receive care from adults who are not the child's biological parents.

Kafala is not merely an informal foster-care agreement. Under the statutory system, it involves judicial authorization, duties of maintenance and protection, and continuing supervision by the guardianship judge.

3. Law No. 15-01: The principal kafala legislation

Law No. 15-01, promulgated in 2002, establishes the framework for the care of abandoned children.

A. Meaning of an abandoned child

Article 1 identifies categories of children under 18 who may qualify as abandoned. These include children:

Born to parents who are unknown.

Born to an unknown father and abandoned by a known mother.

Orphaned or whose parents cannot provide adequate support or lawful means of subsistence.

Whose parents fail in their protective responsibilities in circumstances specified by law.

A child's eligibility must be determined under the statutory conditions. Poverty or family difficulty alone should not be treated as automatically establishing that every child is legally abandoned.

B. Purpose of kafala

Article 2 defines kafala as an undertaking to provide the protection, education, and maintenance that a father would ordinarily provide for his child.

Its purposes include:

Securing a safe and stable living environment.

Meeting the child's food, clothing, housing, and healthcare needs.

Ensuring access to education.

Protecting the child from neglect, abuse, and exploitation.

Providing legal responsibility for the child's day-to-day upbringing.

C. Judicial involvement

The law places important responsibilities on the public prosecutor, the first-instance court, and the guardianship judge. The process includes establishing the child's legal status, assessing prospective caregivers, issuing the relevant order, and monitoring the arrangement.

Ma Loi

+1

4. Procedure for obtaining kafala in Morocco

The statutory process is designed to verify both the child's eligibility and the suitability of the proposed caregiver.

1

Identification and protection

A child found abandoned must receive necessary assistance, and the competent police, gendarmerie, or local authorities must be notified as prescribed by law.

2

Temporary placement and investigation

The public prosecutor arranges temporary placement in an appropriate healthcare or child-protection institution and initiates the required legal steps.

3

Judicial declaration

The competent court examines the circumstances and evidence before determining whether the statutory requirements for declaring the child abandoned are satisfied.

4

Assessment of prospective caregivers

The relevant investigation considers the applicants' legal eligibility, personal circumstances, ability to provide care, and suitability under the applicable statutory requirements.

5

Kafala order and handover

The guardianship judge issues an order if the legal conditions are met. Article 18 provides for execution of the order through the competent court and formal handover of the child.

6

Continuing supervision

The guardianship judge monitors compliance with the caregiver's duties and may order investigations or other protective measures where necessary.

Articles 3–8 and 17–21 of Law No. 15-01 are particularly relevant to the protection, declaration, placement, authorization, and supervision stages.

Ma Loi

+1

5. Rights and obligations of the kafala caregiver

A person entrusted with kafala assumes significant legal and practical responsibilities.

A. Maintenance and education

Article 22 places responsibility for maintenance, custody, and protection on the person or institution providing kafala. The caregiver must attend to the child's essential needs and upbringing.

B. Health and personal safety

The caregiver must protect the child from abuse, neglect, exploitation, and other threats to wellbeing. General child-protection laws may also apply where conduct constitutes a criminal offence or otherwise endangers the child.

C. Legal guardianship

The kafala order gives the caregiver the legally prescribed responsibilities associated with the child's care. It does not confer unlimited parental authority or automatically transfer every legal right associated with biological parentage.

D. Monitoring by the guardianship judge

Article 19 authorizes the guardianship judge to monitor the child's situation and verify that the caregiver is fulfilling the obligations imposed by law. Article 20 provides for measures to secure compliance where an order is not respected.

E. Travel and residence abroad

Article 24 addresses permanent departure from Morocco with a child under kafala. Such relocation requires authorization from the guardianship judge under the statutory conditions.

A Moroccan kafala order should not be assumed to grant unrestricted international travel, residence, immigration status, or recognition as an adoption in another country.

6. Parentage, inheritance, and the child's identity

A. Parentage

Kafala does not create adoptive filiation. The child's legal parentage is not automatically replaced by that of the caregiver.

This distinction can affect civil-status records, parental authority, nationality, immigration, and recognition of family relationships abroad.

B. Inheritance

A child under kafala does not automatically inherit from the caregiver as a legal child merely because of the kafala relationship.

However, the caregiver may make provision for the child through legally permissible mechanisms, including a gift or will, subject to the relevant rules. Article 23 of Law No. 15-01 specifically addresses gifts, legacies, tanzil, and charitable provision for the child under the supervision of the guardianship judge.

C. Name and civil registration

The child's civil registration and identity must be handled under the applicable Moroccan civil-status rules. Kafala should not be treated as automatically changing the child's recorded parentage or granting an unrestricted right to assume the caregiver's surname.

D. The child's right to identity

The child's welfare includes more than material support. Identity, family history, cultural background, personal dignity, and the opportunity to express views appropriate to the child's maturity are also important considerations.

These concerns become particularly significant when a child moves across borders or when a dispute arises about the continuation of care.

7. Case laws concerning kafala, adoption, and child welfare

Important distinction: Reported judgments specifically from Moroccan courts are not always readily available in full, publicly accessible form. The following six authorities therefore include international and foreign-court decisions that directly examine Moroccan kafala or its legal effects. They are highly relevant comparative authorities, but they must not be misrepresented as six judgments of Moroccan courts.

Case 1: Harroudj v. France (2012)

European Court of Human Rights · Application No. 43631/09 · Judgment of 4 October 2012

Facts: The case concerned a French applicant who sought to adopt a child from Algeria who had been placed in her care under kafala.

Legal issue: Whether France's refusal to convert the kafala arrangement into adoption violated the right to respect for family life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Decision and reasoning: The European Court of Human Rights found no violation of Article 8. It considered the relevant legal framework, including the prohibition on adoption in the child's personal law and the possibility of providing protection through kafala.

Legal principle: A State may respect a foreign kafala arrangement without necessarily transforming it into adoption, provided its approach remains compatible with the applicable human-rights obligations.

Relevance to Morocco: The judgment helps explain why Moroccan kafala should be treated as a distinct child-protection institution rather than automatically equated with adoption. It also illustrates the importance of assessing the child's actual legal protection, not merely the label attached to the arrangement.

Case 2: Chbihi Loudoudi and Others v. Belgium (2014)

European Court of Human Rights · Application No. 52265/10 · Judgment of 16 December 2014

Facts: A Moroccan child was entrusted to her Belgian aunt and the aunt's husband under a kafala arrangement approved in Morocco. The caregivers subsequently sought to adopt her in Belgium.

Legal issue: Whether refusing the requested adoption and the associated residence difficulties violated Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Decision and reasoning: The Court found no violation of Article 8 in relation to the refusal of adoption or the child's residence status. The case involved the distinction between recognizing an existing care relationship and creating a new legal parent-child relationship.

Legal principle: A genuine family relationship established through kafala does not automatically oblige another State to grant adoption. The receiving State may consider its adoption laws, while remaining subject to its obligations concerning family life.

Relevance to Morocco: This is a particularly important authority because the kafala was established in Morocco. It demonstrates that Moroccan caregivers and children moving abroad may encounter different legal consequences in the receiving country, even where the original Moroccan arrangement is valid.

HUDOC

+1

Case 3: Wagner and J.M.W.L. v. Luxembourg (2007)

European Court of Human Rights · Application No. 76240/01 · Judgment of 28 June 2007

Facts: The case concerned the recognition in Luxembourg of an adoption established in Peru. It did not concern a Moroccan kafala order directly.

Legal issue: Whether refusing recognition of a foreign adoption, in the circumstances of the case, was compatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Decision and reasoning: The Court found a violation of Article 8 in the circumstances before it, emphasizing the established family relationship and the consequences of refusing recognition.

Legal principle: International family-law rules must be applied in a manner that takes account of the real family life of the persons concerned and the child's interests.

Relevance to Morocco: Although not a kafala case, Wagner provides a useful comparison when considering the recognition of cross-border family arrangements. It should not be read as requiring every foreign court to convert Moroccan kafala into adoption. The legal nature of the original arrangement and the receiving State's obligations remain relevant.

Case 4: French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber, 10 October 2006

Pourvoi No. 06-15.264

Facts: The dispute involved an adoption application concerning a child subject to Moroccan law.

Legal issue: Whether a foreign court could authorize adoption despite the prohibition under the child's applicable personal law and the legal distinction between adoption and kafala.

Decision and reasoning: The French Court of Cassation quashed the challenged decision, holding that the lower court had failed to respect the applicable legal restrictions. It emphasized that Moroccan law prohibited adoption and that kafala was not equivalent to adoption.

Legal principle: A kafala arrangement cannot simply be treated as an adoption where the governing legal rules distinguish between the two institutions.

Relevance to Morocco: The judgment illustrates the consequences of failing to distinguish guardianship or care arrangements from legal filiation in international family disputes. It also demonstrates why the legal effects of a Moroccan kafala order must be carefully identified before a foreign adoption is sought.

Cour de cassation

Case 5: French Court of Cassation, First Civil Chamber, 2013

Pourvoi No. 12-26.161

Facts: The case concerned an application to adopt a child placed under kafala and the legal significance of the original guardianship arrangement.

Legal issue: Whether a kafala order could be used as a basis for establishing adoptive parentage under French law, notwithstanding the restrictions arising from the child's applicable personal law.

Decision and reasoning: The case addressed the relationship between the Moroccan kafala arrangement, the child's continuing legal parentage, and the requirements governing adoption under French law. The Court's reasoning stressed that kafala confers responsibilities for care and upbringing but does not itself create adoptive filiation.

Legal principle: The authority to care for a child is not equivalent to an unrestricted power to establish a new legal parent-child relationship or to change the child's civil status.

Relevance to Morocco: The decision is useful for examining the limits of a caregiver's authority, the importance of judicial supervision, and the legal consequences of attempting to convert kafala into adoption abroad. It should be applied with attention to the precise procedural posture and rules of the receiving jurisdiction.

Cour de cassation

Case 6: Y.B. and N.S. v. Belgium (2018)

UN Committee on the Rights of the Child · Communication No. 12/2017

Facts: A Moroccan child was declared abandoned by the Court of First Instance of Marrakesh in 2011 and subsequently placed with caregivers under kafala. The Moroccan authorities investigated the prospective caregivers' suitability, and the Moroccan court authorized the child's travel abroad.

Legal issue: The international proceedings concerned the child's treatment and protection in the receiving State, including the implications of the kafala arrangement and the child's welfare.

Legal framework: The case arose under the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a communications procedure. It must be distinguished from a judgment of a Moroccan civil court.

Legal principle: Decisions affecting children under kafala must be examined in light of children's rights and the practical protection available to them. Recognition of a foreign care arrangement, residence, and continuity of protection can have significant consequences for a child's welfare.

Relevance to Morocco: The case provides a concrete example of how the Moroccan statutory process operates: declaration of abandonment, assessment of caregivers, judicial authorization, and permission to travel abroad. It also highlights the importance of coordination between Moroccan authorities and receiving States.

UNHRDB

+1

Comparative significance of the six authorities

These authorities are most useful when read alongside Articles 1–2, 17–24, and 25–29 of Law No. 15-01 and Article 149 of the Moroccan Family Code. The foreign judgments explain the international consequences of kafala; they do not replace Moroccan statutory rules.

8. Child welfare and the best-interests principle

The best interests of the child are central to modern child-protection law. Under Article 3 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the child's best interests must be a primary consideration in actions concerning children.

The principle is relevant to Moroccan kafala even though the specific legal consequences of kafala are determined by Moroccan law.

A. Physical and emotional security

A child needs a safe home, appropriate nutrition, healthcare, education, and protection from violence. A stable caregiver relationship can help provide continuity and emotional security.

B. Education and development

Caregivers must attend to the child's education and development. Child welfare involves not only survival and maintenance but also the opportunity to develop abilities, establish relationships, and participate in society.

C. Participation of the child

Article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child recognizes the child's right to express views on matters affecting them, with due weight given to age and maturity.

Moroccan Law No. 15-01 also addresses hearing a child who has reached the age of discernment in certain decisions, including matters involving visitation and restoration of parental responsibility.

D. Protection from exploitation

A kafala arrangement should not be used as a means of trafficking, exploitation, forced labour, or evading child-protection requirements. Judicial screening and continuing supervision are important safeguards.

E. Family relationships and identity

Where biological parents or relatives remain legally relevant, the child's relationships and identity must be considered under the applicable law. Kafala does not necessarily sever all existing family ties.

9. Termination of kafala and disputes concerning care

Articles 25–29 of Law No. 15-01 regulate circumstances in which kafala may cease and the measures that may follow.

Relevant circumstances include:

The child reaching legal adulthood, subject to statutory exceptions.

The death of the child.

The death of the persons providing kafala in circumstances specified by law.

Other statutory circumstances affecting continuation of the arrangement.

The breakdown of the marriage of two caregivers.

The restoration of parental responsibility where the legal grounds for abandonment have ceased.

A. Separation or divorce of caregivers

Under Article 26, if the marriage of two persons providing kafala ends, the guardianship judge may determine whether the arrangement should continue with one of them or whether another protective measure is necessary.

The decision must be made under the statutory framework, with the child's interests taken into account.

B. Restoration of parental responsibility

Article 29 permits the child's parents, or one of them, to seek restoration of guardianship through a judicial decision if the reasons for abandonment have ceased.

The court must consider the relevant circumstances and hear a child who has reached the age of discernment. If the child refuses to return, the court must take that view into account when deciding what serves the child's interests.

C. Alternative protective arrangements

If kafala ends and continued protection is necessary, Article 28 provides for appropriate measures, including the designation of another person or institution where required.

The ending of a particular kafala arrangement should not be confused with the ending of the child's right to protection.

10. International kafala and recognition abroad

Cross-border cases create additional legal difficulties.

A Moroccan kafala order may be valid in Morocco but have different effects in another country. Depending on the receiving State's law, questions can arise concerning:

Recognition of guardianship and care responsibilities.

Visas, residence permits, and nationality.

Permission to travel with the child.

Authority to make medical and educational decisions.

Eligibility for adoption under foreign law.

Recognition of inheritance or civil-status consequences.

The 1996 Hague Convention on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition, enforcement, and cooperation in respect of parental responsibility and measures for the protection of children is relevant in jurisdictions where it applies. Kafala is treated as a child-protection measure distinct from adoption.

Before relocating a child, caregivers should establish the requirements of both Moroccan law and the destination country's immigration and family-law systems. Permission to leave Morocco does not, by itself, guarantee permanent residence or adoption abroad.

11. Challenges in Morocco's kafala and child welfare system

Several issues remain important for legal analysis and policy development.

1. Distinction between care and legal parentage: Kafala provides a protective relationship but does not reproduce all the legal consequences of adoption.

2. Financial support and long-term security: Caregivers must plan for the child's needs, including education, healthcare, and future independence.

3. Monitoring and accountability: Effective supervision is essential to identify neglect, abuse, or failure to meet statutory obligations.

4. International mobility: Children may face administrative and legal uncertainty when their caregivers move abroad.

5. Identity and family connections: Decisions must account for the child's identity, history, and legally relevant relationships with biological relatives.

6. Access to justice: Caregivers, children, and biological relatives may need legal assistance when disputes arise concerning guardianship, visitation, restoration of parental responsibility, or recognition abroad.

7. Consistency of judicial decisions: Clear procedures and well-reasoned judgments help ensure that children's interests are considered in a predictable manner.

12. Conclusion

Morocco's adoption, kafala, and child welfare framework seeks to provide family-based care while preserving the legal distinction between caregiving and parentage. Article 149 of the Family Code prohibits adoption from creating legal filiation, while Law No. 15-01 establishes a formal system for the protection and upbringing of qualifying abandoned children.

Kafala imposes meaningful duties of maintenance, education, custody, and protection. Judicial authorization and supervision help safeguard the child, while statutory provisions address travel abroad, gifts and legacies, termination of care, and restoration of parental responsibility.

The six international and foreign-court authorities discussed above illustrate how these arrangements interact with adoption law, family life, child identity, and cross-border recognition. They must be distinguished from Moroccan domestic precedents, and their application depends on the jurisdiction and facts of each dispute.

The fundamental legal principle is that a child's right to safe, stable, and dignified care must be protected through lawful procedures, while the legal consequences of kafala remain distinct from those of adoption.

Academic note: For formal legal research, verify the full text of the relevant judgments and the current consolidated versions of Law No. 15-01 and the Moroccan Family Code. The international decisions discussed here are comparative authorities, not six Moroccan domestic judgments.