Trespassing And Land Use Offences In Finland
Trespassing and Land Use Offences in Finland
Trespassing and land use offences involve unauthorized access to property, illegal construction, or violations of zoning and environmental regulations. Finnish law balances private property rights, public access rights, and environmental protection.
Legal Framework in Finland
Criminal Code of Finland (39/1889, as amended)
Chapter 28 – Offences Against Property
Section 8 – Unlawful Entry: Entering private property without permission.
Section 10 – Disturbance of Property: Interfering with lawful use of property.
Chapter 40 – Environmental Offences
Violating land use regulations or protected areas may lead to fines or imprisonment.
Land Use and Building Act (132/1999)
Governs zoning, construction, and building permits.
Illegal construction can result in administrative fines and criminal liability.
Everyman’s Right (Jokamiehenoikeus)
Allows public access to private land for recreation, but does not permit damage, trespass to buildings, or interference with cultivation.
Penalties
Trespassing: Conditional fines or imprisonment up to 6 months.
Land use offences: Fines, demolition orders, or imprisonment up to 2 years for serious violations.
Finnish Case Law on Trespassing and Land Use Offences
Case 1: Helsinki District Court, 2015 – Unauthorized Entry into Private Land
Details
Defendant entered private property to collect berries without permission and damaged a fence.
Court Decision
Convicted of trespassing and property damage (Chapter 28, Sections 8 and 10).
Sentence: Conditional fine of €600.
Significance
Confirms that unauthorized entry and property damage is punishable even for minor recreational activities beyond the limits of Everyman’s Right.
Case 2: Turku District Court, 2016 – Illegal Construction in Protected Area
Details
Homeowner built a small cabin in a zoned nature protection area without permits.
Court Decision
Convicted of land use offence under Land Use and Building Act, fined €15,000.
Ordered to demolish unauthorized construction.
Significance
Shows strict enforcement of zoning laws and environmental protection.
Case 3: Oulu District Court, 2017 – Trespassing and Disturbance
Details
Defendant entered a commercial farm without permission and released livestock as a protest.
Court Decision
Convicted of trespassing and disturbance of property (Chapter 28, Sections 8 and 10).
Sentence: 1 year conditional imprisonment and compensation to farm owner.
Significance
Demonstrates criminal liability for trespass combined with interference in lawful use of property.
Case 4: Espoo District Court, 2018 – Illegal Logging on Private Land
Details
Defendant cut down trees without owner permission or environmental permits.
Court Decision
Convicted of land use offence and environmental violation, fined €20,000.
Ordered to replant trees and compensate for ecological damage.
Significance
Combines trespass with environmental harm, highlighting Finland’s environmental protection focus.
Case 5: Tampere District Court, 2019 – Camping and Fires on Private Land
Details
Defendant camped and lit a fire in a private forest area without owner permission.
Court Decision
Convicted of trespassing and endangering property, fined €1,200.
Significance
Limits recreational rights under Everyman’s Right, emphasizing owner’s property rights and safety.
Case 6: Kotka District Court, 2020 – Unauthorized Agricultural Use
Details
Defendant cultivated crops on a neighboring land without consent.
Court Decision
Convicted of trespassing and unlawful use of land, sentenced to 6 months conditional imprisonment.
Ordered to remove crops and compensate landowner.
Significance
Shows criminal liability for economic exploitation of someone else’s land.
Case 7: Rovaniemi District Court, 2021 – Illegal Snowmobile Use in Protected Area
Details
Defendant used snowmobiles in a national park, causing environmental damage.
Court Decision
Convicted of environmental violation and trespass, fined €8,000.
Required to restore damaged area.
Significance
Demonstrates that Finland criminalizes unauthorized recreational activity in protected areas.
Key Observations from Finnish Case Law
Trespass Is Punishable
Unauthorized entry beyond recreational rights can lead to fines or conditional imprisonment.
Environmental and Land Use Protection Is Strict
Construction, logging, or agricultural use without permits can result in substantial fines and demolition orders.
Everyman’s Right Has Limits
Public access is limited to non-destructive activities, away from private buildings, crops, or fenced areas.
Property Interference Increases Liability
Trespass combined with damage or economic exploitation increases penalties.
Restitution and Remediation
Courts often order compensation and restoration of damage in addition to fines or imprisonment.

0 comments