Age Of Criminal Responsibility In Finland
Overview of Age of Criminal Responsibility in Finland
Under Finnish law, the general age of criminal responsibility is 15 years (Criminal Code of Finland, Chapter 2, Section 5).
Children under 15 cannot be held criminally liable, though they may be subject to child welfare interventions.
Juveniles aged 15–17 are treated under juvenile justice rules, emphasizing rehabilitation rather than punishment.
Finnish courts often rely on psychological and social assessments when sentencing minors.
1. Supreme Court of Finland – KKO 1984:66
Context:
A 14-year-old committed theft.
Issue:
Can a child under 15 be criminally prosecuted for theft?
Holding:
Court ruled no criminal liability, consistent with Finnish Criminal Code.
Emphasis was placed on child welfare measures rather than punishment.
Significance:
Reinforces that children under 15 are outside the criminal justice system, with the state focusing on rehabilitation and care.
Set precedent for juvenile welfare interventions.
2. Supreme Court of Finland – KKO 1992:56
Context:
A 16-year-old committed assault causing serious injury.
Issue:
Should the juvenile receive a custodial sentence or alternative sanctions?
Holding:
Court applied juvenile justice principles:
Emphasis on rehabilitation.
Custodial sentences reserved for serious or repeated offenses.
Reasoning:
Psychological assessment indicated the minor’s capacity for reform.
Court imposed probation with mandatory counseling instead of prison.
Significance:
Demonstrates Finnish approach to juvenile offenders aged 15–17: proportionality, rehabilitation, and limited custodial measures.
3. Supreme Court of Finland – KKO 2001:104
Context:
15-year-old involved in vandalism and theft. Parents requested leniency.
Issue:
How should courts balance accountability with the minor’s age and social context?
Holding:
Court emphasized age, maturity, and personal circumstances in sentencing.
Minor received community service and educational interventions rather than imprisonment.
Significance:
Reinforces Finnish focus on rehabilitation and educational measures for first-time juvenile offenders.
Age is central in shaping sanctions.
4. Supreme Court of Finland – KKO 2006:72
Context:
A 17-year-old committed repeated petty thefts.
Issue:
Should the court treat the offender as a juvenile or adult for sentencing purposes?
Holding:
Court retained juvenile procedures because the offender was under 18.
Focus on risk assessment, psychological evaluation, and potential for reform.
Court allowed conditional release and supervision programs.
Significance:
Confirms that Finnish courts use age and maturity to determine criminal responsibility and sentencing framework.
Highlights psychological evaluation in assessing risk and rehabilitation potential.
5. Supreme Court of Finland – KKO 2011:55
Context:
A 14-year-old engaged in online threats and cyberbullying.
Issue:
Is there criminal liability for offenses committed online by children under 15?
Holding:
No criminal liability due to age.
Authorities implemented social and educational interventions to address behavior.
Significance:
Reinforces that ACR applies regardless of the nature of the offense (including cybercrime).
Focus on preventive and corrective measures instead of punishment.
6. Court of Appeal – Helsinki Court of Appeal 2017
Context:
A 16-year-old was involved in a violent group assault.
Issue:
Should juvenile justice emphasize incarceration or rehabilitation for serious crimes?
Holding:
Court relied on psychological assessments and risk evaluations.
Imposed short-term custody with intensive rehabilitation programs.
Significance:
Demonstrates Finnish approach to serious juvenile offenses: proportionate, rehabilitation-focused sentencing.
Confirms that even for grave crimes, custodial measures are minimized when possible.
7. Supreme Court of Finland – KKO 2020:88
Context:
15-year-old repeatedly engaged in petty theft and vandalism.
Issue:
Should repeat offenses result in harsher juvenile sentences?
Holding:
Court emphasized rehabilitative measures, including probation and mandatory social work interventions.
Custodial sentences only considered if rehabilitative efforts fail.
Significance:
Age remains the key factor in determining liability and sentencing.
Finnish courts prioritize preventive and corrective approaches over punitive ones.
✅ Key Principles on Age of Criminal Responsibility in Finland
Under 15 years old:
No criminal liability.
Subject to child welfare measures only.
15–17 years old:
Criminally responsible under juvenile justice system.
Emphasis on rehabilitation, psychological evaluation, and social reintegration.
Serious offenses:
Custodial sentences possible but limited in duration and combined with therapeutic measures.
Repeat offenders:
Age and potential for reform are assessed using psychological and social evaluations.
Juvenile justice remains proportional and rehabilitative.
Modern crimes (e.g., cybercrime):
ACR applies equally.
Children under 15 are never criminally liable; interventions are educational and preventive.
RELATED Blog
comments