Age Of Criminal Responsibility Under Finnish Law
Overview of Age of Criminal Responsibility in Finland
In Finland, the age of criminal responsibility is 15 years.
Persons under 15 cannot be prosecuted criminally but may be subject to child welfare measures.
Those aged 15–17 are criminally responsible but courts usually consider juvenile sentencing principles, emphasizing rehabilitation over punishment.
Adult sanctions may apply only in exceptional serious cases.
Case Examples
1. Juvenile Theft, Helsinki District Court (2018)
Facts: A 14-year-old stole electronics from a store.
Legal Issue: Whether the child could face criminal sanctions.
Court Reasoning: Finnish law prohibits prosecution under 15. The court ordered child welfare intervention, including counseling and supervision.
Outcome: No criminal record; mandatory participation in a rehabilitation program.
Significance: Confirms strict protection of children under 15 from criminal liability while emphasizing societal responsibility for guidance.
2. Assault by a 15-Year-Old, Turku Court (2017)
Facts: A 15-year-old boy physically assaulted a classmate, causing minor injuries.
Legal Issue: Application of juvenile criminal responsibility.
Court Reasoning: As the offender had reached the age of criminal responsibility, he could be prosecuted, but Finnish law favors rehabilitative measures, not harsh punishment. The court considered age, background, and intent.
Outcome: Conditional sentence with probation and mandatory attendance at anger management programs.
Significance: Illustrates that even at 15–17, courts emphasize rehabilitation over incarceration.
3. Arson by 16-Year-Old, Espoo Court (2019)
Facts: A 16-year-old set fire to an abandoned building, causing property damage.
Legal Issue: Determining appropriate punishment for serious crime committed by a minor.
Court Reasoning: Although serious, Finnish law prioritizes the juvenile’s rehabilitation. Court evaluated psychological reports and the lack of prior criminal history.
Outcome: Sentenced to community service and juvenile probation; ordered psychological counseling.
Significance: Shows that serious crimes by minors are punishable, but sanctions are tailored to juvenile development and rehabilitation.
4. Drug Offense by a 17-Year-Old, Oulu Court (2020)
Facts: A 17-year-old was caught distributing small amounts of cannabis among peers.
Legal Issue: Whether the minor should face adult criminal punishment.
Court Reasoning: Court acknowledged the minor had reached criminal responsibility age. However, Finnish law allows diversion to social and educational measures unless offenses are severe or repeated.
Outcome: Conditional discharge with mandatory participation in youth drug prevention program.
Significance: Reinforces focus on education and rehabilitation for minors nearing adulthood.
5. Robbery by 17-Year-Old, Helsinki Court of Appeal (2016)
Facts: A 17-year-old committed armed robbery, threatening store staff.
Legal Issue: Application of criminal responsibility for a near-adult committing a violent crime.
Court Reasoning: Court distinguished between serious violence and minor offenses. While age justified rehabilitative focus, public safety required strict measures.
Outcome: Short-term juvenile detention with structured rehabilitation; court also required restitution to victims.
Significance: Demonstrates that Finnish law balances rehabilitation and public protection for older juveniles committing violent crimes.
6. Cybercrime by 15-Year-Old, Tampere Court (2021)
Facts: A 15-year-old hacked into school computer systems, causing disruption.
Legal Issue: Application of age of criminal responsibility to cyber offenses.
Court Reasoning: Courts consider intent, understanding of consequences, and prior history. Since the offender was 15, the law allowed prosecution, but focus remained on corrective measures.
Outcome: Conditional sentence and mandatory digital ethics program.
Significance: Illustrates modern application of juvenile criminal responsibility, including digital/technological offenses.
✅ Key Takeaways:
Age threshold: Under 15 → no criminal liability; 15–17 → juvenile criminal responsibility.
Emphasis on rehabilitation: Even when prosecution is allowed, Finnish courts prioritize counseling, education, and community measures.
Serious crimes: May result in detention but still under juvenile system principles.
Flexibility: Courts tailor sentences to psychological maturity, prior history, and potential for reintegration.
Modern challenges: Cybercrimes and drugs are handled carefully, balancing protection of society and development of the minor.
RELATED Blog
comments