Analysis Of Dna, Fingerprint, And Ballistic Evidence
What is DNA Evidence?
DNA (Deoxyribonucleic Acid) is the genetic blueprint unique to each individual (except identical twins). DNA profiling compares biological samples—blood, saliva, semen, hair roots, skin cells—found at a crime scene with the biological reference sample of a suspect or victim.
Why DNA Is Powerful
Highly accurate (probability of two people sharing the same DNA profile is extremely low).
Useful in violent crimes, sexual offenses, missing persons, mass disasters, and paternity issues.
Can be preserved for long periods.
Key Principles
Chain of custody must be maintained.
Collection and storage should follow scientific protocol.
Expert testimony is essential.
Courts reject DNA if contamination or procedural error is shown.
II. Fingerprint Evidence – Detailed Analysis
What is Fingerprint Evidence?
Fingerprints are impressions made by ridge patterns on human fingers. These patterns are unique and remain unchanged throughout life.
Why Fingerprints Are Important
Universally accepted as reliable identification.
Useful in burglary, theft, murder, and weapon handling.
Key Principles
Uniqueness: No two people have identical fingerprints.
Permanence: They do not change over time.
Locard’s Exchange Principle: When two surfaces come into contact, traces are exchanged.
Modern Enhancements
AFIS (Automated Fingerprint Identification System)
Latent print recovery with chemicals like ninhydrin or cyanoacrylate.
III. Ballistic Evidence – Detailed Analysis
What is Ballistic Evidence?
Ballistics is the scientific study of firearms, ammunition, bullets, and the pattern of their travel and impact. Ballistic experts examine:
Weapon used
Firing distance
Gunshot residues
Bullet trajectory
Matching bullets/cartridges to firearms
Why Ballistics Matter
Helps establish shooter position
Connects weapon to suspect
Establishes cause of death
Key Principles
Every firearm leaves unique markings on bullets.
Fired cartridges can often be traced back to the exact weapon.
Gunshot residue can place suspect at or near firing crime.
IV. Case Laws (More than 4–5, All Explained in Detail)
Below are important Indian and international cases involving DNA, fingerprint, and ballistic evidence.
A. DNA EVIDENCE CASE LAWS
1. Santosh Kumar Singh v. State (Priyadarshini Mattoo Case), 2010
Facts
Priyadarshini Mattoo was raped and murdered in 1996. The trial court acquitted the accused despite strong evidence.
Role of DNA Evidence
DNA samples from semen matched the accused with extremely high probability.
The Supreme Court criticized the trial court for ignoring scientific evidence.
Outcome
Conviction restored.
Significance: Established DNA as conclusive evidence when properly collected.
2. Surendra Koli & Anr. v. State of U.P. (Nithari Killings Case), 2011
Facts
Multiple children went missing and were murdered in Noida.
Role of DNA
DNA profiling of skeletal remains confirmed identity of victims.
DNA linked the accused to items recovered from his residence.
Outcome
Conviction upheld.
Significance: DNA can establish victim identity in decomposed/burned body cases.
3. Krishan Kumar Malik v. State of Haryana, 2011
Facts
Rape case where the victim's statements were consistent.
Role of DNA
DNA successfully matched the accused.
The Court ruled that DNA tests are invaluable in sexual assault cases.
Outcome
Conviction affirmed.
Significance: Court emphasized necessity of DNA in modern investigation.
*4. People v. Wesley (1994, New York Court)
Facts
One of the earliest cases where DNA evidence was challenged.
Role of DNA
Defense questioned reliability of DNA techniques.
Prosecution demonstrated scientific validity of RFLP testing.
Outcome
Conviction upheld.
Significance: DNA became broadly admissible in U.S. courts.
B. FINGERPRINT EVIDENCE CASE LAWS
5. State of Maharashtra v. Sukhdev Singh, 1992
Facts
Accused was convicted for murder based solely on fingerprint evidence.
Role of Fingerprints
Fingerprints found on a weapon matched the accused.
Court ruled that fingerprint evidence alone could be sufficient for conviction if properly established.
Outcome
Conviction sustained.
Significance: Fingerprint evidence can be sole basis for conviction.
*6. Emperor v. Abdul Hamid (AIR 1935 All 60)
Facts
Forgery case where fingerprints were found on disputed documents.
Role of Fingerprints
Expert evidence proved fingerprint match.
Court elaborated standards for fingerprint comparison.
Outcome
Accused convicted.
Significance: Early recognition of fingerprints as reliable scientific evidence.
7. R v. Buckley (UK, 1999)
Facts
Accused denied involvement in burglary.
Role of Fingerprints
A partial fingerprint was found at the scene.
Court analyzed reliability of partial prints.
Outcome
Conviction upheld.
Significance: Partial fingerprints admissible if supported by expert testimony.
C. BALLISTIC EVIDENCE CASE LAWS
8. State of U.P. v. Hari Prasad, 1974
Facts
Murder case where ballistic evidence was crucial.
Role of Ballistics
Expert matched fired cartridge with seized weapon.
Trajectory analysis contradicted accused’s version.
Outcome
Conviction sustained.
Significance: Ballistic matching considered highly reliable.
9. Lakshmi v. State of U.P., 2002
Facts
Accused challenged ballistic evidence, claiming weapon was planted.
Role of Ballistics
Court held ballistic examination is scientific and unbiased.
Matching striations on bullets confirmed weapon use.
Outcome
Conviction upheld.
Significance: Reinforced credibility of ballistic experts.
10. State of Punjab v. Jugraj Singh, 2002
Facts
Weapon recovered at the instance of accused.
Role of Ballistics
Forensic examination proved bullets from scene were fired from the same weapon.
Strengthened circumstantial evidence chain.
Outcome
Accused convicted.
Significance: Recovery + ballistic matching is strong incriminating evidence.
V. Comparative Importance in Courts
| Evidence Type | Strength | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| DNA | Highest accuracy, conclusive identification | Risk of contamination; chain of custody essential |
| Fingerprints | Widely accepted, inexpensive, unique | Partial prints may be disputed |
| Ballistics | Helps link weapon to crime; reliable | Requires proper weapon recovery; tampering issues |
VI. Conclusion
Courts increasingly rely on scientific evidence. DNA, fingerprint, and ballistic analyses, when accompanied by proper chain of custody and expert testimony, can decisively prove guilt or innocence. The above case laws show the judiciary’s growing acceptance of forensic science as an indispensable part of modern criminal justice.
RELATED Blog
comments