Analysis Of Financial Crimes

07 Nov 2025 --
0 Comments

1. Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Ltd. vs. SEBI (2012)

Facts:
Sahara collected billions of rupees from investors through optionally fully convertible debentures without proper regulatory approvals. SEBI alleged this was a violation of securities laws.

Issue:
Whether the company’s financial mobilization without SEBI approval constitutes a financial crime.

Judgment:
The Supreme Court held that Sahara had violated SEBI regulations and ordered refund to investors with interest. The Court emphasized investor protection and regulatory compliance.

Analysis:

Highlights the role of regulatory bodies in preventing financial fraud.

Financial crimes can involve sophisticated corporate structures to bypass law.

Emphasizes accountability for raising public funds without authorization.

Key Principle:
Collecting funds from the public without regulatory approval is a punishable financial offense.

2. Punjab National Bank (PNB) Scam – Nirav Modi Case (2018)

Facts:
Nirav Modi and associates defrauded PNB of over ₹14,000 crore using fraudulent Letters of Undertaking (LoUs) to obtain overseas credit.

Issue:
How corporate fraud, misrepresentation, and banking malpractice constitute financial crime.

Judgment:
Investigations by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and CBI led to charges under FEMA, Indian Penal Code (IPC) Section 420, 120B, and Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). Courts emphasized tracing financial flows and freezing assets.

Analysis:

Showcases fraud through misuse of banking instruments.

Involves both domestic and international financial systems.

Digital forensics and transaction audits were crucial in identifying fraudulent transactions.

Key Principle:
Financial crimes often involve complex instruments and require forensic accounting for detection.

3. Satyam Computers Scam – Ramalinga Raju Case (2009)

Facts:
Chairman Ramalinga Raju admitted to inflating company profits by over ₹7,000 crore, falsifying accounts, and misleading investors.

Issue:
Corporate accounting fraud and misrepresentation to shareholders.

Judgment:
The CBI and SEBI investigated; Raju and others were convicted under IPC Sections 420, 120B, 406, 409, and Companies Act violations. The Supreme Court and lower courts underscored transparency in financial reporting.

Analysis:

Demonstrates internal manipulation of books as a form of financial crime.

Highlights the importance of auditing and regulatory oversight.

Digital forensic techniques were used to trace accounting records and email communications.

Key Principle:
Misrepresentation of accounts to investors constitutes criminal financial fraud.

4. Harshad Mehta Securities Scam (1992)

Facts:
Harshad Mehta manipulated the stock market using fake bank receipts (BRs), siphoning off huge sums and inflating stock prices.

Issue:
Securities fraud, banking fraud, and market manipulation.

Judgment:
Investigated by SEBI and CBI, Mehta was convicted under IPC Section 420, 120B, and relevant provisions of Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act. The scam exposed weaknesses in banking and financial oversight.

Analysis:

Showed how financial crimes exploit systemic loopholes.

Digital and paper trail evidence (BRs, bank records) were crucial in investigation.

Led to reforms in stock market regulations and banking controls.

Key Principle:
Market manipulation and fraudulent financial instruments are serious financial crimes.

5. Vijay Mallya – Kingfisher Airlines Loan Default (2016)

Facts:
Vijay Mallya defaulted on loans worth over ₹9,000 crore taken from multiple Indian banks. Allegations included money laundering and misappropriation of funds.

Issue:
Can corporate default and diversion of funds constitute criminal financial offense?

Judgment:
ED filed charges under PMLA, CBI filed charges under IPC Section 420. Extradition proceedings in the UK were initiated. Courts emphasized accountability of promoters and proper use of borrowed funds.

Analysis:

Financial crime may occur through loan diversion and fund misappropriation.

Requires tracing money flows across companies and jurisdictions.

Demonstrates the intersection of corporate, banking, and criminal laws in financial crimes.

Key Principle:
Default combined with diversion of funds may constitute criminal liability beyond civil repayment obligations.

6. Nirav Modi and Mehul Choksi – Punjab National Bank Fraud (Related but Separate Case)

Facts:
Both accused colluded to obtain fraudulent LoUs and Letters of Credit, defrauding Indian banks internationally.

Judgment:
Courts relied on forensic audit trails, SWIFT messages, and banking transaction logs. ED and CBI invoked PMLA for tracing laundered funds.

Analysis:

Digital forensic analysis of banking systems was central.

Showed transnational nature of modern financial crimes.

Highlighted importance of proactive regulatory vigilance.

Key Principle:
Financial crimes often require forensic accounting, cross-border cooperation, and robust legal frameworks for prosecution.

Summary Table of Principles from Cases:

Case	Crime Type	Key Legal Principle	Role of Forensics/Investigation
Sahara vs SEBI	Unauthorized fund mobilization	Raising funds without regulatory approval is illegal	Financial audits & SEBI investigation
PNB Scam	Banking fraud, money laundering	Misuse of banking instruments constitutes criminal offense	Transaction analysis, forensic accounting
Satyam Scam	Corporate accounting fraud	Falsification of accounts is criminal	Digital record and accounting analysis
Harshad Mehta	Market manipulation	Fake instruments and stock price manipulation = crime	Bank records, forensic trail of BRs
Vijay Mallya	Loan default/diversion	Misuse/diversion of funds can attract criminal liability	Audit trails, financial forensic analysis
Nirav Modi & Mehul Choksi	Banking fraud, PMLA	Transnational financial fraud requires tracing funds	SWIFT message analysis, cross-border forensic accounting