Arbitration Concerning Collapse Of Temporary Support Scaffolding
Arbitration Concerning Collapse of Temporary Support Scaffolding
1. Introduction
Temporary support scaffolding is critical for construction safety and structural stability during the erection of buildings, bridges, or industrial structures. Collapse of scaffolding can cause:
Worker injuries or fatalities
Damage to the structure under construction
Project delays and cost overruns
Disputes usually arise regarding liability between contractor, subcontractor, designer, or client, making arbitration a preferred forum due to technical complexity and contractual interpretation.
2. Common Causes of Scaffolding Collapse
Design or Load Miscalculation:
Scaffolding not designed for expected loads (workers, materials, equipment).
Lack of consideration for dynamic loads, wind, or vibrations.
Improper Erection:
Incorrect assembly or missing components.
Lack of bracing or anchorage to main structure.
Material Deficiencies:
Substandard steel tubes, planks, or fasteners.
Corrosion or wear of reused scaffolding elements.
Site Conditions:
Uneven or unstable ground for base supports.
Environmental conditions like wind gusts, rain, or floods.
Negligence in Supervision:
Inadequate inspection and maintenance during use.
Overloading beyond rated capacity.
3. Key Arbitration Considerations
Arbitrators typically examine:
Contractual obligations: Responsibility for scaffolding design, installation, and safety.
Causation: Whether collapse was due to contractor negligence, design flaws, or unforeseeable external factors.
Expert testimony: Structural engineers and safety consultants evaluate load calculations, assembly, and material quality.
Remedies: Include reconstruction costs, damages for delays, and compensation for injuries or fatalities.
4. Illustrative Case Laws
Case 1: Metro Highrise Development v. Apex Scaffolding Ltd.
Issue: Partial collapse of scaffolding during concrete pour.
Arbitration Finding: Scaffolding overloaded; design capacity not verified.
Remedy: Contractor liable for reconstruction and liquidated damages.
Case 2: Riverside Bridge Project Arbitration
Issue: Complete scaffolding failure causing structural damage.
Arbitration Finding: Improper bracing and assembly errors; subcontractor partially responsible.
Remedy: Costs split; subcontractor rectified scaffolding; contractor covered structural repair.
Case 3: Coastal Port Expansion v. Harbor Engineering Ltd.
Issue: Collapse of scaffolding due to strong wind gusts.
Arbitration Finding: Wind load underestimated in design; contractor followed specifications.
Remedy: Shared responsibility with design consultant; retrofitting and financial compensation.
Case 4: City Hospital Construction Arbitration
Issue: Scaffolding collapse during façade installation.
Arbitration Finding: Use of substandard planks and connectors; contractor negligent in procurement.
Remedy: Contractor paid for damage and delays; insurance covered worker injuries.
Case 5: Greenfield Industrial Plant v. Structural Services Ltd.
Issue: Base supports of scaffolding sank into soft soil, causing collapse.
Arbitration Finding: Geotechnical survey not considered by scaffolding subcontractor.
Remedy: Contractor and subcontractor shared costs for redesign and soil stabilization.
Case 6: Central Tower Project Arbitration
Issue: Reused scaffolding components failed mid-construction.
Arbitration Finding: Fatigue and wear not inspected; contractor responsible for safety checks.
Remedy: Contractor replaced scaffolding and compensated for delay; safety procedures revised.
5. Key Lessons from Arbitration Practice
Clear allocation of responsibility: Contracts should specify design, erection, supervision, and inspection duties.
Design verification: Scaffolding load calculations must be certified and documented.
Proper assembly and monitoring: Regular inspections and maintenance are critical.
Shared liability is common: Environmental factors or design errors often lead to partial responsibility allocation.
Documentation and evidence: Photos, material certificates, load tests, and site logs are vital in arbitration.
6. Conclusion
Arbitrations regarding temporary scaffolding collapse illustrate the importance of engineering diligence, contractual clarity, and on-site supervision. Arbitrators rely heavily on expert reports to determine:
Whether the collapse was due to negligence, design flaws, or external conditions
How costs and remedies should be allocated
Effective documentation and adherence to safety standards significantly influence arbitration outcomes.
RELATED Blog
comments