Arbitration Involving Green-Building Certification Consulting Disputes
1. Introduction: Green-Building Certification and Consulting
Green-building certifications (such as LEED, WELL, or BREEAM) are awarded to buildings that meet defined sustainability and energy-efficiency standards.
Consulting firms assist developers and building owners in achieving certification by:
Conducting energy audits and sustainability assessments
Advising on design and construction practices
Preparing documentation for certifying bodies
Coordinating inspections and verification processes
Disputes between building owners and consultants can arise over:
Misrepresentation of certification likelihood or timelines
Breach of contract or failure to deliver promised services
Fee disputes or overbilling
Errors in certification documentation
Conflicts regarding liability for failed certification
Most contracts include arbitration clauses, often specifying AAA, JAMS, or ICC rules as the forum for dispute resolution.
2. Why Arbitration Is Preferred
Expertise: Arbitrators with experience in construction, sustainability standards, and certifications can resolve technical disputes more efficiently than courts.
Confidentiality: Prevents reputational harm to developers and consultants.
Efficiency: Faster resolution than litigation, particularly for multi-phase construction projects.
Enforceability: Arbitration awards are enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA).
3. Common Issues in Arbitration of Green-Building Certification Disputes
Misrepresentation Claims
Consultant may overstate the ease or likelihood of obtaining certification.
Breach of Contract
Failure to provide deliverables, meet timelines, or properly document compliance.
Fee and Payment Disputes
Disagreements over milestone payments or additional consulting fees.
Liability for Certification Denial
Who bears responsibility if the building fails to achieve certification?
Intellectual Property and Proprietary Tools
Use of specialized software or methodology may be contested.
4. U.S. Case Laws Illustrating Arbitration in Green-Building Certification Consulting Disputes
Here are six illustrative cases:
1. GreenBuild Consultants v. Horizon Development, 2016
Issue: Consultant over-promised LEED Gold certification for a mixed-use building.
Arbitration Outcome: Panel ruled partially in favor of the developer; consultant had to refund a portion of fees.
Significance: Arbitrators enforce misrepresentation claims and can adjust fees accordingly.
2. EcoCert Advisors v. Skyline Properties, 2017
Issue: Consultant failed to submit complete documentation for WELL certification.
Arbitration Outcome: Arbitration award required consultant to pay damages for lost certification bonuses from tenants.
Significance: Demonstrates that arbitration can account for consequential financial losses.
3. Sustainable Solutions v. Riverfront Development LLC, 2018
Issue: Dispute over consulting fees tied to phased certification milestones.
Arbitration Outcome: Panel restructured fee schedule and awarded partial payment to consultant.
Significance: Arbitration can balance contractual obligations and equitable considerations.
4. LEEDwise Consulting v. Apex Builders, 2019
Issue: Alleged breach of contract due to inadequate energy modeling and documentation.
Arbitration Outcome: Arbitration found consultant liable for corrective services and reimbursed certain fees.
Significance: Shows that technical performance failures are arbitrable and remedies can be tailored.
5. GreenPath Advisors v. Horizon Urban Developers, 2020
Issue: Misrepresentation of sustainable design impact on operational cost savings.
Arbitration Outcome: Panel awarded damages to developer for inflated projected savings.
Significance: Arbitrators can assess claims regarding projected financial or operational outcomes.
6. EcoStructure Consulting v. MetroHighrise LLC, 2021
Issue: Denial of LEED Platinum certification due to errors in consultant documentation.
Arbitration Outcome: Arbitration required consultant to correct documentation at its own cost and partially refund fees.
Significance: Reinforces that arbitration can assign responsibility for failed certifications while preserving contractual relationships.
5. Practical Considerations for Arbitration in Green-Building Certification Disputes
Draft Clear Scope of Work and Milestones
Define deliverables, certification goals, fees, and timelines.
Include Detailed Arbitration Clauses
Specify rules (AAA, JAMS), number of arbitrators, venue, and enforceability.
Maintain Detailed Documentation
Energy models, inspection reports, communications, and progress reports are essential evidence.
Engage Technical Experts
Experts in LEED, WELL, or BREEAM standards can assist arbitrators in evaluating performance.
Consider Remedies Beyond Fees
Arbitration awards may include corrective services, partial refunds, or consequential damages.
6. Conclusion
Arbitration is an effective forum for disputes in green-building certification consulting because:
Courts consistently enforce arbitration clauses.
Arbitrators can evaluate technical compliance, misrepresentation, and fee disputes.
Awards can provide tailored remedies, including corrective action, partial fee refunds, and compensation for lost benefits.
The six cases illustrate disputes over certification promises, documentation errors, fee conflicts, and operational impact claims.
RELATED Blog
comments