Arbitration Law in Greenland (Denmark)
Arbitration Law in Greenland (Denmark)
Greenland, an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark, follows Danish law in many areas, including arbitration. The legal framework governing arbitration in Greenland is largely influenced by Danish Arbitration Law, which is consistent with international standards, such as the UNCITRAL Model Law and the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958).
In Greenland, arbitration is primarily governed by Danish Law No. 556 of June 24, 2005, which applies to both domestic and international arbitration. This law is based on principles of party autonomy, procedural flexibility, and limited judicial interference, making Greenland an attractive jurisdiction for arbitration.
1. Legal Framework for Arbitration in Greenland
Danish Arbitration Act
Danish Arbitration Act (2005): Greenland follows the Danish Arbitration Act, which provides the primary framework for resolving disputes through arbitration. This law applies in Greenland in the same way it does in Denmark. It is heavily influenced by the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, ensuring that the system is compatible with international practices.
New York Convention (1958): Greenland, as part of Denmark, is a signatory to the New York Convention. This allows the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Greenland, providing a significant advantage for international arbitration.
2. Arbitration Agreement
Written Agreement: For an arbitration agreement to be valid, it must be in writing. The agreement can either be a standalone document or part of a broader contract. The parties must agree to resolve disputes through arbitration, and this must be clearly stated in the agreement.
Enforceability: If one party refuses to arbitrate despite agreeing to do so, the other party can seek a court order compelling arbitration. Greenland's courts generally respect the validity of arbitration agreements and encourage arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution method.
3. Arbitrators
Appointment: The parties are free to choose their arbitrators. If the parties cannot agree on an arbitrator, the Danish Arbitration Act provides mechanisms for appointing arbitrators, including court intervention if necessary. In some cases, an arbitration institution may assist in the appointment process.
Impartiality and Independence: Arbitrators are required to be impartial and independent. If an arbitrator is found to have a conflict of interest, the parties may request their removal. Arbitrators must disclose any potential conflicts before accepting the appointment.
Number of Arbitrators: The default is usually three arbitrators unless the parties agree otherwise. This includes one arbitrator appointed by each party and a third arbitrator chosen by the two appointed arbitrators.
4. Arbitration Procedure
Flexibility: One of the main advantages of arbitration in Greenland is the flexibility of the process. The parties have the freedom to decide on many aspects of the arbitration, such as the applicable rules, language, and location. If the parties do not agree, the arbitral tribunal has the power to establish these procedures.
Default Rules: If the parties do not specify the procedure, the Danish Arbitration Act provides default rules that govern the arbitration process, including the rights of the parties, the conduct of hearings, and deadlines.
Interim Measures: The arbitral tribunal in Greenland has the authority to issue interim measures to protect the interests of the parties during arbitration. In urgent cases, the parties may also apply to the courts for interim relief.
Place of Arbitration: The place of arbitration is determined by the parties. If they cannot agree on a location, the arbitral tribunal can decide.
5. Role of the Court
Limited Judicial Intervention: Greenland follows the principle of limited court intervention in arbitration. Courts are generally involved in enforcing arbitration agreements and awards, but they do not interfere with the arbitral process or decisions.
Compelling Arbitration: If a party refuses to participate in arbitration despite agreeing to do so, the other party can seek a court order to compel arbitration under the Danish Arbitration Act.
Setting Aside an Award: A party may challenge an arbitral award in court on limited grounds, such as:
- Lack of Jurisdiction: If the tribunal exceeded its powers or lacked jurisdiction over the dispute.
- Procedural Irregularities: If the arbitration proceedings did not comply with the arbitration agreement or were unfair.
- Violation of Public Policy: If the award violates Greenlandic or Danish public policy.
6. Arbitral Awards
Binding Nature of Awards: Once an arbitral award is rendered, it is binding on the parties. The award is enforceable, and the losing party is required to comply voluntarily. If they refuse to comply, the winning party may seek enforcement in court.
Enforcement of Foreign Awards: As Greenland is part of Denmark and Denmark is a signatory to the New York Convention, foreign arbitral awards can be enforced in Greenland. The local courts will recognize and enforce international arbitral awards, subject to the grounds set out in the Convention.
Setting Aside an Award: The grounds for setting aside an award are limited, similar to other jurisdictions that follow the UNCITRAL Model Law. They generally include issues related to jurisdiction, fairness, and public policy concerns.
7. Confidentiality
- Confidentiality of Proceedings: Arbitration proceedings in Greenland are typically confidential. The Danish Arbitration Act maintains the confidentiality of hearings and awards unless the parties agree otherwise. However, there may be exceptions if disclosure is required by law or agreed upon by the parties.
8. Arbitration Institutions in Greenland
Greenland itself does not have a well-established domestic arbitration institution like some other jurisdictions. However, as part of Denmark, parties in Greenland often use Danish or international arbitration institutions for administering arbitration proceedings.
Danish Arbitration Institute (DAI): The Danish Arbitration Institute provides administrative support for domestic and international arbitration. Parties in Greenland can use the DAI for arbitrations that are governed by Danish law or international arbitration rules.
International Arbitration Institutions: Due to Greenland's connection to Denmark and its international orientation, many parties choose global arbitration institutions such as the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) or the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) for managing international disputes.
9. Advantages of Arbitration in Greenland
International Framework: Greenland benefits from the international arbitration framework of Denmark and its participation in the New York Convention, which allows for the easy recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards.
Flexibility and Party Autonomy: The Danish Arbitration Act provides a flexible arbitration process, allowing parties to choose their procedures, rules, and even the language of the arbitration.
Limited Court Involvement: Judicial intervention is minimal, ensuring that the arbitral process remains independent and efficient. The courts only intervene to enforce the arbitration agreement, issue interim measures, or set aside awards on limited grounds.
Attractive for International Arbitration: Due to its connection with Denmark and the availability of international institutions, Greenland is a viable option for international arbitration.
10. Challenges of Arbitration in Greenland
Cost: While arbitration is generally considered more cost-effective than litigation, the cost of arbitration, especially in international disputes, can be significant, especially for smaller businesses.
Limited Local Infrastructure: Greenland does not have as extensive a domestic arbitration infrastructure as other jurisdictions like Denmark or London. This may make it less attractive for parties seeking a full range of specialized services.
Enforcement Challenges: Although New York Convention recognition exists, the enforcement of certain awards could still face practical challenges, especially if the award is against public policy or procedural norms in Greenland.
Conclusion
Arbitration in Greenland is governed by the Danish Arbitration Act, which provides a comprehensive and flexible legal framework for resolving disputes through arbitration. The legal framework is largely aligned with international standards, particularly the UNCITRAL Model Law and the New York Convention, facilitating the enforcement of both domestic and foreign arbitral awards in Greenland.
Arbitration in Greenland offers benefits such as party autonomy, confidentiality, and minimal judicial interference, making it an attractive option for resolving both domestic and international disputes. However, challenges related to costs, enforcement, and the limited local infrastructure for arbitration may need to be considered by parties seeking arbitration in the region.
RELATED Blog
0 comments