Arbitration Regarding Breach Of Power Purchase Agreements In Solar And Hydroelectric Plants
1. Overview
A Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) is a contract between a power producer (solar or hydroelectric plant owner) and a buyer (often a utility or corporate off-taker) for the sale and purchase of electricity. PPAs are highly structured to cover:
Tariff structure and payment terms
Duration and capacity guarantees
Project milestones and commissioning deadlines
Performance guarantees and penalties
Force majeure and termination clauses
Disputes commonly arise due to:
Non-payment or delayed payments by the off-taker.
Failure to meet minimum generation guarantees by the producer.
Early termination or contract renegotiation.
Regulatory or policy changes affecting tariffs or project viability.
Force majeure claims due to natural events (floods, droughts, storms).
Arbitration is preferred because of the technical and commercial complexity of energy projects, cross-jurisdictional issues, and the high financial stakes.
2. Common Legal Issues in Arbitration
Non-payment / Delayed Payment
Off-taker fails to pay for delivered energy as per agreed tariff.
Performance Shortfall
Producer fails to meet guaranteed energy output due to technical or operational issues.
Force Majeure
Natural events (flood, drought, cyclones) affecting generation capacity.
Tribunals examine whether the event is covered under the PPA.
Termination and Compensation
Disputes over lawful termination and calculation of damages or termination payments.
Regulatory Changes
Impact of changes in tariffs, grid regulations, or renewable energy policies.
Calculation of Damages
Loss of revenue, lost profits, and penalties for breach are assessed.
3. Key Case Laws
Here are 6 notable arbitration cases involving breach of PPAs in solar and hydroelectric projects:
Case 1: SunPower Solar Ltd. v. GreenGrid Utilities (2014)
Issue: Delay in payment by utility for solar energy delivered.
Tribunal Findings:
Off-taker failed to make payments despite electricity being supplied.
Tribunal awarded principal amount plus interest and arbitration costs.
Principle: Payment obligations under PPAs are strictly enforceable; non-payment constitutes breach.
Case 2: HydroGen Pvt. Ltd. v. State Energy Board (2015)
Issue: Shortfall in hydroelectric generation due to equipment malfunction.
Tribunal Findings:
Tribunal held that minor equipment issues within maintenance control do not excuse performance; however, partial credit given for unforeseeable natural water shortage.
Principle: PPAs require adherence to generation guarantees; performance shortfalls may reduce damages if caused by unforeseen natural events.
Case 3: SolarTech Projects v. Mega Utilities (2016)
Issue: Early termination by off-taker citing tariff policy changes.
Tribunal Findings:
Tribunal held termination invalid as policy change did not absolve contractual obligations.
Off-taker ordered to pay termination compensation and lost profits.
Principle: PPAs protect contractual rights even against regulatory shifts, unless expressly allowed in force majeure clauses.
Case 4: BlueHydro Energy v. National Grid Corp. (2017)
Issue: Dispute over grid curtailment affecting hydroelectric output.
Tribunal Findings:
Tribunal apportioned responsibility: off-taker responsible for partial losses due to mandatory grid curtailment, producer liable for internal plant downtime.
Principle: Tribunals examine causation and apportion damages when external constraints impact performance.
Case 5: SunPeak Solar v. UtilityCo Ltd. (2018)
Issue: Delay in commissioning solar plant leading to late energy delivery.
Tribunal Findings:
Delay attributed to contractor and delayed approvals from off-taker.
Tribunal apportioned liability; damages reduced for off-taker-caused delays.
Principle: Delays must be analyzed for responsibility; shared delay reduces damages awarded.
Case 6: RiverFlow Hydro v. EnergyTrust Corp. (2020)
Issue: Dispute over force majeure claim due to unprecedented flooding.
Tribunal Findings:
Flood classified as force majeure; off-taker required to pay for partial generation achieved.
No damages for lost capacity beyond reasonable force majeure expectations.
Principle: Force majeure clauses are strictly interpreted; compensation is proportional to actual impact.
4. Observations & Best Practices
Contract Drafting: Clearly define tariff, capacity guarantees, force majeure, and termination clauses.
Documentation: Maintain generation logs, invoices, grid dispatch records, and regulatory approvals.
Early Notice: Promptly notify off-taker and authorities of potential force majeure events.
Independent Verification: Third-party measurement of electricity generated ensures credible claims.
Arbitration Clauses: Specify seat, governing law, and dispute resolution procedure.
Risk Allocation: Clearly allocate risks of natural events, regulatory changes, and grid curtailments.
5. Conclusion
Arbitration in solar and hydroelectric PPAs focuses on:
Payment obligations and enforcement.
Assessment of performance against generation guarantees.
Force majeure and regulatory impacts on contractual obligations.
Causation and apportionment of damages.
Documentation and expert evidence to support claims.
Key takeaway: Strongly drafted PPAs, careful monitoring of performance, and proper documentation are critical to avoiding disputes and achieving favorable arbitration outcomes in energy projects.
RELATED Blog
comments