Arbitration Regarding Breach Of Power Purchase Agreements In Solar, Wind, And Hydro Projects
1. Introduction: PPAs in Renewable Energy Projects
Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) are long-term contracts between:
Project developers (solar, wind, hydro)
Distribution companies (DISCOMs) or government utilities
They typically cover:
Tariff structure and escalation
Project commissioning milestones
Grid connection and scheduling obligations
Force majeure and termination clauses
Payment security mechanisms (LCs, escrow accounts, or payment guarantees)
Breach of a PPA often leads to arbitration under the agreement’s dispute resolution clause.
2. Common Causes of Arbitration in Renewable Energy PPAs
(a) Delay in Project Commissioning
Failure to achieve Commercial Operation Date (COD)
Penalty disputes or termination due to delays
(b) Payment and Tariff Disputes
Late or non-payment by DISCOMs
Disagreement over tariff adjustments, escalation, or grid curtailment
(c) Termination Disputes
Alleged breach by either party leading to unilateral termination
Disagreement on compensation and damages
(d) Force Majeure Events
Natural disasters affecting generation
Policy changes affecting tariffs or grid operation
(e) Grid Availability and Curtailment
Disputes arising from limited evacuation infrastructure
Compensation for loss of generation
3. Issues Typically Framed by Arbitral Tribunals
Whether the project achieved COD under contractual conditions
Whether payment defaults constitute fundamental breach
Applicability and interpretation of force majeure clauses
Liability for delayed commissioning or curtailed generation
Quantum of damages or termination compensation
4. Legal Principles Governing PPA Arbitration
(i) Contractual Interpretation is Key
Courts defer to arbitrators’ interpretation of PPAs and related annexures.
(ii) Force Majeure Excuses
Delay or non-performance may be excused if covered by force majeure events.
(iii) Limited Judicial Interference
Courts do not revisit technical or commercial decisions of arbitral tribunals unless the award is perverse or illegal.
(iv) Payment Security Obligations
Utilities must honor escrow, LC, or other payment guarantees unless excused by contractual or statutory provisions.
(v) Termination Clauses
Unilateral termination must strictly comply with contractual conditions.
5. Important Case Laws (At Least 6)
1. NTPC Ltd. v. M/s. Maytas Infra Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
Principle:
Delay in commissioning is subject to assessment of extensions and force majeure clauses.
Relevance:
Applied in solar and wind PPAs where COD delays occur due to unforeseen circumstances.
2. Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd. v. Dewan Chand Ram Saran
Supreme Court of India
Principle:
Interpretation of contract clauses is within the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal.
Relevance:
Supports arbitrators’ assessment of PPA tariff disputes and breach determination.
3. Arosan Enterprises Ltd. v. Union of India
Supreme Court of India
Principle:
Even an erroneous interpretation of the contract is not sufficient to set aside an award unless unreasonable.
Relevance:
Ensures arbitral awards regarding PPAs are respected, even if alternative interpretations exist.
4. ONGC Ltd. v. Saw Pipes Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
Principle:
Breach of express contractual obligations constitutes patent illegality.
Relevance:
Invoked when developers fail to meet COD or operational obligations under PPAs.
5. Energy Watchdog v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
Supreme Court of India
Principle:
Change in law or regulatory orders may excuse performance.
Relevance:
Applied to renewable projects affected by tariff changes or grid curtailment due to regulatory directives.
6. McDermott International Inc. v. Burn Standard Co. Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
Principle:
Arbitrators are the final judges of facts and technical issues.
Relevance:
Critical in determining project performance, energy generation, and technical compliance under PPAs.
7. Nabha Power Ltd. v. Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
Principle:
Contracts should be interpreted with commercial efficacy and intent.
Relevance:
Used in determining compensation and damages for breach or termination of renewable energy PPAs.
6. Typical Arbitral Findings in PPA Disputes
COD delays excusable if within force majeure or employer-caused delay
DISCOMs liable for delayed payments, subject to contractual security
Termination compensation based on net present value of remaining tariff payments
Losses due to grid curtailment are typically compensable if outside developer’s control
7. Practical Lessons for Renewable Energy PPAs
Define COD and milestone criteria precisely
Include detailed force majeure clauses for natural and regulatory events
Establish robust payment security mechanisms
Include clear curtailment and compensation mechanisms
Maintain documentation for commissioning, generation, and grid dispatch
Ensure dispute resolution clauses specify arbitration forum, seat, and governing law
8. Conclusion
Arbitration concerning breach of PPAs in solar, wind, and hydro projects emphasizes:
Precise contractual compliance for commissioning, generation, and payment
Allocation of risks for natural events, regulatory changes, and grid limitations
Technical and commercial expertise of arbitrators in renewable energy disputes
Indian courts consistently uphold arbitral awards enforcing PPA obligations while respecting commercial and technical assessments made by tribunals.
RELATED Blog
comments