Attitudes towards knowledge that include valuing truth, openness to new ideas and ethics associated with knowledge creation and usage;
Attitudes Towards Knowledge
Key Attitudes
Valuing Truth:
Pursuit of truth is foundational to knowledge.
Truth-seeking demands honesty, integrity, and commitment.
In law, truth is crucial for justice and credibility.
Openness to New Ideas:
Intellectual humility allows acceptance of new or contrary ideas.
Innovation and progress depend on openness.
Courts encourage reinterpretation of laws in light of new social or scientific developments.
Ethics in Knowledge Creation and Usage:
Ethical knowledge creation respects intellectual property, consent, and accuracy.
Ethical usage avoids misinformation, manipulation, or harm.
In administrative and legal contexts, ethical knowledge use ensures fair governance.
Case Laws Illustrating These Attitudes
1. State of Uttar Pradesh v. Rajesh Gautam (2003) 5 SCC 531 (Valuing Truth and Fairness)
Facts:
The case involved wrongful conviction based on fabricated evidence.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court stressed the supreme importance of truth in judicial processes.
Courts must safeguard truth and protect innocent persons.
The judgment emphasized ethical responsibility of all parties to present truthful evidence.
Importance:
This case underscores the attitude of valuing truth as fundamental to justice and knowledge in legal proceedings.
2. K.K. Verma v. Union of India (1962) AIR 345 (Openness to New Ideas in Law)
Facts:
The case questioned traditional interpretations of laws in the light of social changes.
Judgment:
The Court recognized the need for the law to evolve with changing circumstances.
It accepted openness to new ideas as essential for the law to serve justice effectively.
Rejected rigid formalism, encouraging progressive judicial thought.
Importance:
Demonstrates the attitude of openness to new ideas in the interpretation and application of legal knowledge.
3. Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997) 6 SCC 241 (Ethics in Knowledge Creation and Usage)
Facts:
The case addressed sexual harassment at the workplace and the absence of adequate laws.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court laid down guidelines (Vishaka Guidelines) relying on international knowledge and norms about workplace ethics.
The Court showed responsibility in ethical knowledge usage by framing binding guidelines to protect rights.
It balanced traditional practices with modern ethical standards.
Importance:
Highlights the ethical dimension of knowledge creation and application in law for social justice.
4. Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) 5 SCC 1 (Openness and Ethics in Digital Knowledge Usage)
Facts:
The case challenged restrictions on online free speech under the IT Act.
Judgment:
The Court upheld freedom of expression while stressing responsible and ethical use of digital platforms.
Recognized openness to new modes of communication while emphasizing accountability.
Struck down vague provisions that curtailed knowledge-sharing ethically.
Importance:
This case epitomizes balancing openness to new ideas with ethical considerations in the digital age.
5. Novartis AG v. Union of India (2013) 6 SCC 1 (Ethics in Knowledge and Intellectual Property)
Facts:
The case involved patent rights on pharmaceutical products and access to medicine.
Judgment:
The Court upheld public health over mere patent monopoly.
Emphasized ethical use of scientific knowledge for the greater good.
Encouraged knowledge creation that balances innovation and societal needs.
Importance:
Shows ethical considerations in the creation and usage of knowledge in science and technology.
Summary
Valuing truth ensures justice and credibility.
Openness to new ideas promotes progress and adaptability.
Ethics in knowledge ensures responsible creation and use, protecting rights and societal welfare.
Courts play a pivotal role in fostering these attitudes through judgments balancing tradition and innovation.
RELATED Blog
0 comments