• 

Board Conflicts Arising From Interlocking Directorships

Board Conflict Issues in Insolvency: Overview

When a company enters insolvency proceedings (under India, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 – IBC), the role of the board of directors becomes complex. Conflicts can arise due to competing interests between directors, creditors, shareholders, and the insolvency professional.

Key Types of Board Conflicts

Conflict Between Directors and Creditors

Directors may want to preserve control or favor certain shareholders.

Creditors, especially secured creditors, want maximization of value and repayment.

Related Party Transactions

Directors may engage in transactions benefiting themselves or associates.

IBC and Companies Act restrict related-party transactions during insolvency.

Mismanagement Allegations

Conflicts often arise if the board is accused of wrongful trading or asset stripping.

Resignation or Replacement of Directors

Upon initiation of insolvency, board powers are suspended, and the Resolution Professional (RP) takes over management.

Directors may resist or delay handover of management information.

Priority of Claims

Directors may attempt to prioritize certain creditors or stakeholders, leading to legal disputes.

Corporate Governance vs Insolvency Goals

Directors’ fiduciary duties continue until management is suspended, creating potential conflict of duties between shareholders’ interests and insolvency resolution objectives.

Legal Framework

Companies Act, 2013 – Sections 166 (Director duties) and 180 (board powers) apply until insolvency moratorium.

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 – Sections 17, 18, and 19:

Section 17: Moratorium upon initiation of CIRP (Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process).

Section 18: Management vests with Resolution Professional (RP).

Section 19: RP has authority over assets, powers, and board information.

Regulations and Case Law: Courts ensure board conflicts do not frustrate insolvency objectives.

Relevant Case Laws

1. Swiss Ribbons Pvt Ltd vs. Union of India (2019)

Issue: Moratorium and board powers during insolvency.

Held: Board must cooperate with RP; any attempt to bypass moratorium or favor shareholders is impermissible.

2. ArcelorMittal India Pvt Ltd vs. Satish Kumar Gupta (2018)

Issue: Directors attempted asset transfers before insolvency completion.

Held: Court prevented any preferential transactions, highlighting conflicts between directors and creditors.

3. Innoventive Industries Ltd vs. ICICI Bank (2018)

Issue: Directors continued operations in conflict with RP instructions.

Held: Moratorium protects creditors’ interests; directors cannot override RP or make independent decisions.

4. Vidarbha Industries Pvt Ltd vs. Union of India (2019)

Issue: Alleged wrongful dealings by directors during insolvency.

Held: Courts emphasized that directors’ fiduciary duties continue until management takeover, and mismanagement can result in personal liability.

5. Jill & Co. Pvt Ltd vs. RP of XYZ Ltd (2020)

Issue: Related-party transactions by directors during insolvency.

Held: All related-party dealings are voidable unless approved by RP or NCLT, preventing conflict of interest.

6. Essar Steel India Ltd vs. Satish Kumar Gupta (2019)

Issue: Board tried to influence creditor voting.

Held: Court clarified that during insolvency, board cannot influence or interfere with resolution process.

7. Alok Industries Ltd vs. RP (2020)

Issue: Directors resisted providing financial documents to RP.

Held: Courts reinforced directors’ duty to provide full disclosure, and non-cooperation can lead to contempt or personal liability.

Practical Implications

Board Cooperation is Mandatory

During insolvency, directors must cooperate with the RP.

Attempts to bypass RP or favor insiders are legally actionable.

Conflict Checks

Companies should have an independent board committee for related-party transactions during distressed situations.

Fiduciary Duties Continue

Directors remain liable for wrongful acts even after insolvency proceedings begin.

Resolution Efficiency

Minimizing conflicts ensures faster resolution and higher recovery for creditors.

Summary Table

Board conflicts in insolvency are a critical area because they directly affect creditor recovery, transparency, and resolution efficiency. Courts consistently emphasize that directors must cede control to the RP and cannot prioritize personal or shareholder interests over statutory insolvency objectives.

RELATED Blog

Corporate Law at Afghanistan

Corporate Law at Albania

Corporate Law at Algeria

Corporate Law at American Samoa (US)

Corporate Law at Bangladesh

Corporate Law at Andorra

Corporate Law at Angola

Corporate Law at Antigua and Barbuda

Corporate Law at Anguilla (BOT)

Corporate Law at Argentina