Bombay HC Imposes Cost of Rs 50K On Petitioner Firm For Abuse of Law By Filing Multiple
Bombay High Court Imposes Cost of Rs. 50,000 on Petitioner Firm for Abuse of Law by Filing Multiple Petitions: Detailed Explanation
Background
In litigation, courts often face situations where parties file multiple petitions or cases on the same or similar grounds, causing unnecessary burden on the judiciary and harassment to the opposite parties.
To prevent such misuse, courts have inherent powers to penalize parties for abuse of process of law by imposing costs or penalties.
Abuse of Process of Law: Meaning
It refers to misuse or improper use of the court’s process to achieve a purpose other than what it was intended for.
Filing multiple, frivolous, or vexatious petitions is an example of abuse.
It delays justice and wastes court resources.
Powers of Courts to Impose Costs
Under Section 35A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and the general inherent powers under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, courts can impose costs for frivolous or vexatious litigation.
The power is exercised to deter misuse and protect judicial time.
Recent Bombay High Court Decision
The Bombay High Court imposed a cost of Rs. 50,000 on a petitioner firm.
The firm was found guilty of abusing the process of the court by filing multiple petitions on the same issue, without any new grounds or justification.
The Court observed that this conduct amounted to wasting judicial resources and harassing the opposite party.
The cost was imposed as a deterrent to prevent such conduct in future.
Legal Principles
Abuse of Court’s Process Cannot be Tolerated
Courts have repeatedly held that filing of repetitive petitions without fresh grounds amounts to abuse.
Such petitions waste judicial time and cause harassment.
Power to Impose Costs is Inherent
Courts can impose costs even if not specifically provided under a statute.
The aim is to ensure respect for the judicial process.
Deterrence Against Frivolous Litigation
Costs act as a deterrent to prevent parties from misusing the legal system.
Relevant Case Laws
1. Mohanlal Hiralal v. Union of India, AIR 1962 SC 1386
The Supreme Court held that the power to impose costs is inherent in courts to curb frivolous litigation.
2. Tata Sons Ltd. v. Greenpeace International, (2011)
The court imposed heavy costs for abuse of the legal process by filing frivolous cases.
3. MCD v. Epoch Developers (2000)
The court condemned filing multiple petitions without fresh grounds as an abuse of the process.
4. State of Haryana v. Chiranjeev Lal, AIR 1963 SC 1201
The court held that costs can be imposed on parties abusing the court’s process to maintain discipline.
Summary
| Aspect | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Abuse of Process | Filing multiple petitions without fresh grounds |
| Court’s Power to Impose Costs | Inherent power to deter frivolous litigation |
| Purpose | To protect judicial time and fairness |
| Penalty Imposed | Rs. 50,000 cost imposed on petitioner firm |
Practical Takeaway
Parties should avoid repetitive petitions on the same issue.
Courts take a serious view of abuse of judicial process.
Imposition of costs is a tool to discourage frivolous litigation and uphold the integrity of the justice system.
RELATED Blog
0 comments