Bribery In Awarding Government It Infrastructure Contracts
Bribery in Awarding Government IT Infrastructure Contracts
Definition:
Bribery in government IT infrastructure contracts occurs when public officials, contractors, or intermediaries engage in corrupt practices to influence the award or execution of IT projects, including:
Awarding contracts for hardware, software, networking, or cloud infrastructure
Influencing tender evaluation, project scope, or vendor selection
Receiving kickbacks or gifts to favor certain companies
Collusion between officials and private vendors to inflate costs or bypass procurement rules
Impact:
Increases project costs and delays implementation
Reduces transparency and public trust in government IT systems
Encourages selection of unqualified vendors
Threatens cybersecurity and operational reliability
Legal Framework
1. Indian Law
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PCA):
Section 7 – Bribery by public officials
Section 8 – Gratification to influence contracts
Section 13 – Criminal misconduct by public servants
Indian Penal Code (IPC):
Section 120B – Criminal conspiracy
Section 420 – Cheating
Section 406 – Criminal breach of trust
General Financial Rules (GFR) & CVC Guidelines:
Govern tendering, procurement, and anti-corruption measures in government IT projects
2. International Framework
U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA):
Applies to bribery of foreign officials in government IT projects
UK Bribery Act, 2010:
Covers corporate liability for bribery in public procurement
OECD Anti-Bribery Guidelines:
Applicable for cross-border IT contracts
Major Cases
1. NICNET Contract Bribery Case (India, 2015)
Facts:
Officials involved in awarding NICNET networking contracts allegedly received kickbacks from a private IT firm.
Bribes were disguised as consultancy fees.
Legal Findings:
PCA §7 – Acceptance of gratification
PCA §13 – Criminal misconduct
IPC §120B – Criminal conspiracy
Outcome:
Officials suspended and prosecuted
Contract canceled and re-tendered
Strengthened oversight in IT contract award processes
Significance:
Demonstrates bribery in government networking and IT infrastructure procurement.
2. Delhi e-Governance IT Infrastructure Bribery Case (2016)
Facts:
Alleged bribes were paid to officials to favor a private vendor in setting up e-governance servers and software solutions.
Tender evaluation was manipulated to ensure vendor selection.
Legal Findings:
PCA §7 – Bribery
IPC §120B – Conspiracy
IPC §420 – Cheating
Outcome:
Investigation by CBI; officials suspended
Contract annulled; project re-tendered
Introduced stricter transparency in e-governance IT procurement
Significance:
Highlights bribery risks in digital government service projects.
3. Kerala State IT Infrastructure Contract Bribery Case (2017)
Facts:
Contractors bribed state IT officials to win contracts for building state-wide data centers and networking projects.
Payments included cash and luxury gifts.
Legal Findings:
PCA §7 – Acceptance of gratification
IPC §406 – Criminal breach of trust
IPC §120B – Conspiracy
Outcome:
Officials prosecuted; contractors blacklisted
IT procurement guidelines revised to enhance transparency
Significance:
Shows bribery linked to large-scale state IT infrastructure projects.
4. Rajasthan E-Procurement Platform Bribery Case (2018)
Facts:
Officials of the e-procurement department were allegedly bribed to favor a specific IT contractor for developing a government e-procurement platform.
Legal Findings:
PCA §7 – Bribery
IPC §120B – Criminal conspiracy
IPC §420 – Cheating
Outcome:
Officials arrested; tender process invalidated
Independent audit initiated for transparency
Significance:
Illustrates bribery affecting critical e-governance digital platforms.
5. Andhra Pradesh Smart City IT Contract Scam (2019)
Facts:
Contractors offering IT infrastructure for smart city projects allegedly paid kickbacks to senior officials to secure contracts.
Tendering rules were bypassed to favor selected vendors.
Legal Findings:
PCA §7 and §13 – Bribery and criminal misconduct
IPC §120B – Conspiracy
Outcome:
Officials suspended; contracts canceled
Smart city IT project procurement audited and restructured
Significance:
Shows bribery in high-value IT infrastructure projects linked to urban development.
6. Maharashtra Government Cloud Hosting Contract Case (2016)
Facts:
A private vendor paid bribes to officials to win cloud hosting and data management contracts for government departments.
Legal Findings:
PCA §7 – Bribery
IPC §420 – Cheating the government
IPC §406 – Criminal breach of trust
Outcome:
Officials prosecuted; vendor fined and blacklisted
Policy introduced for competitive and transparent IT procurement
Significance:
Highlights bribery risks in emerging IT technologies for government use.
7. National e-Governance Division (NeGD) IT Procurement Bribery Case (2017)
Facts:
Officials accepting kickbacks to favor certain contractors for software development and system integration projects.
Payments were disguised as training and consultancy fees.
Legal Findings:
PCA §7 – Bribery by public servants
IPC §120B – Criminal conspiracy
Outcome:
Officials suspended; project contracts reissued
Strengthened due diligence and audit requirements
Significance:
Shows bribery in system integration and large-scale IT contracts for national projects.
Key Takeaways
Bribery occurs at multiple stages: tender evaluation, project award, contract execution, and software/system selection.
Public officials and private contractors are jointly liable under PCA and IPC provisions.
Evidence includes bank transfers, consultancy invoices, emails, audit trails, and witness statements.
Penalties include imprisonment, fines, contract cancellation, blacklisting, and policy reforms.
Digitalization of procurement, independent audits, and whistleblower policies help reduce bribery risks.
High-value IT infrastructure projects are particularly vulnerable due to complex technical evaluation and large budgets.
RELATED Blog
comments