Bribery In Awarding Healthcare Supply Tenders
I. Introduction: Bribery in Healthcare Supply Tendering
Healthcare procurement, especially for medicines, vaccines, medical equipment, and consumables, is highly susceptible to bribery and corruption due to:
High-Value Contracts – Hospital and government tenders often involve millions of dollars.
Urgency and Complexity – Emergency procurement (e.g., vaccines, ventilators) may bypass standard oversight.
Discretionary Evaluation Committees – Tender committees have significant discretion in awarding contracts.
Limited Transparency – Confidentiality around pricing, technical evaluations, and supplier capabilities can create opportunities for illicit influence.
Legal Framework
Anti-corruption laws: e.g., Prevention of Corruption Act (India), U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), UK Bribery Act.
Public procurement laws: e.g., EU procurement directives, national health procurement rules.
Criminal offenses include: bribery, kickbacks, bid-rigging, favoritism, and fraud.
II. Mechanisms of Bribery in Healthcare Tenders
Common forms of bribery include:
Kickbacks – Suppliers give cash or gifts to procurement officials for contract awards.
Bid Manipulation – Tenders are designed to favor a particular company.
Phantom Contracts – Payment for supplies not delivered, often using forged certificates.
Price Inflation – Suppliers inflate contract prices, sharing surplus funds with officials.
Insider Information – Suppliers gain confidential info about competitors’ bids.
III. Detailed Case Studies (6 Cases)
Case 1 – National Health Vaccine Procurement Scandal (Illustrative – India)
Facts:
A government health ministry issued a tender for COVID-19 vaccine procurement. A supplier paid bribes to senior officials to ensure their bid was selected despite offering higher prices than competitors.
Legal Issues:
Bribery of Public Officials – Kickbacks were disguised as “consultancy fees.”
Fraud and Loss to the State – Overpayment for vaccines caused financial loss.
Outcome:
Officials arrested under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Supplier blacklisted from future government contracts.
Policy reforms included mandatory e-tendering and transparent bid scoring.
Case 2 – Hospital Equipment Tender in Kenya (2018)
Facts:
A county hospital issued tenders for surgical equipment. Investigations revealed that certain committee members received payments from a supplier in exchange for awarding contracts, despite the equipment not meeting safety standards.
Legal Issues:
Bribery and Abuse of Official Position
Endangerment of Patients – Substandard medical equipment was installed.
Outcome:
Committee members prosecuted; jail terms imposed.
Hospital canceled contracts and replaced officials.
Regulatory reforms mandated quality verification of medical equipment before payments.
Case 3 – Nigerian State Drug Supply Fraud (2019)
Facts:
A drug supplier bribed procurement officers to gain a monopoly over antibiotic tenders. The supplier submitted inflated invoices and delivered expired drugs to rural health centers.
Legal Issues:
Bribery and Kickbacks
Health Risk – Delivery of expired medicines.
Corporate Liability – The company knowingly engaged in corrupt practices.
Outcome:
Officials and company executives charged under the Nigerian Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act.
Public health audits initiated; contract terminated.
Law enforcement emphasized stricter auditing in drug procurement.
Case 4 – Brazilian Public Hospital Tender (2016)
Facts:
A company supplying surgical gloves and disposable materials made monthly payments to a hospital procurement officer to ensure contract renewal, despite higher bids from competitors.
Legal Issues:
Influence Peddling and Bribery
Bid Rigging – Competitors were unfairly excluded.
Outcome:
Officer convicted and sentenced to prison.
Company fined heavily and barred from future tenders.
Transparency reforms in hospital procurement introduced, including online bid disclosures.
Case 5 – U.S. VA Hospital Medical Supply Scandal (2009)
Facts:
A supplier bribed officials in the Department of Veterans Affairs to secure tenders for surgical instruments. Contracts were awarded without competitive bidding, and prices were inflated.
Legal Issues:
Bribery of Federal Officials (FCPA violations for international contractors)
Fraud – Government suffered financial loss.
Outcome:
Officials and executives prosecuted; prison terms served.
Supplier paid restitution and fines.
VA revised internal controls to prevent bribery, including mandatory whistleblower reporting.
Case 6 – South African PPE Tender Bribery During COVID-19 (2020)
Facts:
During the COVID-19 pandemic, a supplier bribed officials to obtain tenders for personal protective equipment (PPE). Investigations revealed inflated prices and delivery of substandard PPE to public hospitals.
Legal Issues:
Bribery and Corruption – Under Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act.
Public Health Risk – PPE failed safety standards.
Conflict of Interest – Officials awarded tenders to friends and associates.
Outcome:
Officials arrested; supplier prosecuted.
Parliamentary inquiry led to tighter oversight of emergency health procurement.
Implementation of e-procurement and competitive scoring systems to reduce corruption.
IV. Lessons and Key Themes
High-Risk Areas: Emergency procurement, monopoly-prone contracts, and high-value supply contracts.
Common Methods: Kickbacks, bid-rigging, phantom deliveries, and insider manipulation.
Legal Consequences: Jail, fines, blacklisting, contract cancellations.
Systemic Reforms:
Mandatory e-tendering.
Independent audit of bids.
Whistleblower protection.
Verification of medical quality before payment.
These six cases highlight the global patterns of bribery in healthcare procurement and how courts and anti-corruption agencies have responded.
RELATED Blog
comments