Case Law: North Korean Refugees Prosecuted In China
1. Case: North Korean Defector Crossing Near Tumen River (2014)
Incident: A North Korean defector was apprehended while attempting to cross into China near the Tumen River.
Charges: Illegal border crossing under PRC Criminal Law (Article 331 – entering the country without permission).
Court Reasoning: The court emphasized that all foreigners must comply with PRC immigration laws. Evidence included border patrol reports and the individual’s confession. Humanitarian concerns were secondary to border security.
Outcome: 3 years imprisonment, followed by repatriation to North Korea.
Significance: Shows China’s strict enforcement of border laws despite international calls for refugee protection.
2. Case: North Korean Woman Arrested for Working Illegally in Dandong (2016)
Incident: A North Korean woman was arrested while working in a restaurant in Dandong without a legal visa.
Charges: Illegal employment and residence under the PRC Exit and Entry Administration Law.
Court Reasoning: Courts emphasized economic regulation and labor law compliance. Despite her status as a refugee, Chinese authorities treated the case as an administrative violation.
Outcome: 1-year administrative detention and deportation.
Significance: Highlights China’s focus on immigration control over refugee protection.
3. Case: North Korean Defector Smuggling Case (2018)
Incident: A North Korean defector attempted to smuggle cash and cellphones into China, allegedly to contact family abroad.
Charges: Smuggling and illegal border crossing under Articles 151 and 331 of PRC Criminal Law.
Court Reasoning: The court noted that smuggling is a criminal offense, regardless of refugee status. Evidence included confiscated items and surveillance records.
Outcome: 4 years imprisonment.
Significance: Demonstrates that economic or humanitarian motives do not exempt refugees from prosecution under Chinese criminal law.
4. Case: North Korean Family Detained in Jilin (2017)
Incident: A family of four crossed the border to escape food shortages. They were apprehended by local police.
Charges: Illegal entry into China (administrative violation) and residing without permission.
Court Reasoning: Authorities focused on immigration law and public order. Courts noted that while family circumstances were sympathetic, the law must be enforced consistently.
Outcome: Administrative detention of 6 months and deportation to North Korea.
Significance: Illustrates the harsh treatment of refugees, even families, under Chinese law.
5. Case: North Korean Human Trafficking Victim Arrested (2019)
Incident: A North Korean woman who had escaped human trafficking was detained while attempting to travel through China to South Korea.
Charges: Illegal border crossing and travel without permission.
Court Reasoning: Although the woman was a victim of trafficking, Chinese courts applied immigration law strictly. Evidence included border records and statements from border guards.
Outcome: 2-year detention and repatriation to North Korea.
Significance: Highlights the lack of legal protection for North Korean trafficking victims in China, despite international human rights norms.
6. Case: North Korean Student Crossing into Yanji (2020)
Incident: A student attempted to cross the border to attend educational programs in China.
Charges: Illegal entry and residence.
Court Reasoning: The court emphasized that educational or humanitarian reasons do not justify illegal entry. Evidence included documents from border patrols and interviews.
Outcome: 1-year detention, forced repatriation.
Significance: Shows China’s consistent application of PRC immigration law against refugees.
Key Observations
| Aspect | Observation |
|---|---|
| Legal Basis in China | PRC Criminal Law Article 331 (illegal entry), Articles 151–153 (smuggling), Exit and Entry Administration Law |
| Treatment of Refugees | North Korean refugees prosecuted as illegal entrants rather than treated as asylum seekers |
| Penalties | Ranged from 6 months administrative detention to 4 years imprisonment |
| Humanitarian Exceptions | Rarely applied; humanitarian motives do not prevent prosecution or repatriation |
| Common Locations | Tumen River, Dandong, Jilin, Yanji |
Summary:
China prosecutes North Korean refugees primarily for illegal entry, illegal residence, and smuggling, with little recognition of refugee status. Cases consistently show that PRC law prioritizes border control and immigration law enforcement over international humanitarian obligations.
RELATED Blog
comments