Case Law On International Child Adoption Scams
Case 1: M.S.S. Orphanage, Chennai (Tamil Nadu, 1990s–2010s)
Facts:
The orphanage allegedly “procured” children from poor families under false pretenses, claiming them to be orphans.
Children were then placed for inter-country adoption, primarily to families in the Netherlands, US, and Australia.
Issues:
Whether children were illegally taken from their biological parents.
Legality of surrender deeds and consent documents.
Responsibility of the orphanage and intermediaries under Indian law.
Judgment / Outcome:
The Chennai court convicted the orphanage under sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for cheating and criminal conspiracy.
A fine was imposed, but sentences were criticized as too lenient given the scale (over 300 children affected).
Significance:
Highlighted how inter-country adoptions could mask child trafficking.
Led to increased scrutiny by adoption authorities (CARA) on orphanages and intermediaries.
Case 2: Maharashtra “Manufactured Orphans” Case (2002–2010)
Facts:
Several adoption agencies in Maharashtra were found to have kidnapped or coerced children from marginalized communities.
These children were falsely registered as orphans and sent for inter-country adoption.
Issues:
Consent and parental rights were violated.
Documentation for adoption was falsified.
Agencies profited financially from illegal adoptions.
Judgment / Outcome:
Investigations by state police and NGOs revealed the scale of the scam.
Prosecutions were initiated against some individuals, though many escaped stringent penalties.
Significance:
Showed systemic loopholes in adoption procedures.
Emphasized the need for stricter enforcement of adoption laws.
Case 3: Virudhunagar Child Adoption Scam (Tamil Nadu, 2023)
Facts:
A 2.5-year-old boy was illegally put up for adoption.
His birth certificate was falsified, and six individuals (including biological family and intermediaries) were involved.
Issues:
Fabrication of documents to facilitate illegal adoption.
Violation of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act.
Judgment / Outcome:
Six individuals were booked and arrested for criminal conspiracy and child trafficking-related offenses.
Investigation was ongoing with the aim to restore the child to the rightful family.
Significance:
Demonstrates that even domestic adoptions are vulnerable to scams.
Shows increased vigilance by authorities in recent years.
Case 4: Cambodian Adoption Scandal (U.S.–Cambodia, 1990s–2000s)
Facts:
Children were taken from Cambodia and placed with U.S. families as orphans, often with falsified documents.
Many of these children had living relatives or were taken without proper consent.
Issues:
International adoption fraud and violation of children’s rights.
Falsification of records and documents to facilitate cross-border adoption.
Judgment / Outcome:
Several facilitators in the U.S. were indicted and sentenced (up to 18 months in prison).
Led to temporary suspension of Cambodian adoptions to the U.S. and reforms in adoption oversight.
Significance:
Highlights risks of cross-border adoption and trafficking.
Emphasized the importance of verifying consent and child’s background.
Case 5: UNODC Compendium Case (India, 1998–2001)
Facts:
Thirteen individuals were found to have obtained 436 children from tribal communities in India, claiming them for inter-country adoption.
Children were taken using false promises and fabricated surrender deeds.
Issues:
Violation of parental rights and trafficking under Indian law.
Adoption agencies operated for financial gain.
Judgment / Outcome:
Investigations were conducted; limited prosecutions followed.
Regulatory authorities increased oversight of adoption agencies.
Significance:
Demonstrated systemic vulnerabilities in Indian adoption procedures.
Focused attention on protection of children from marginalized communities.
Case 6: Modern Digital Adoption Scam (Delhi/Haryana, 2024)
Facts:
Infants were procured through social media platforms for adoption.
Hospital staff and intermediaries colluded to sell children, often with falsified documents.
Issues:
Use of digital platforms to commit child trafficking.
Violation of Juvenile Justice Act and IPC provisions.
Judgment / Outcome:
Seven individuals were arrested, infants rescued.
Ongoing investigation to prosecute all participants.
Significance:
Illustrates the evolution of adoption scams in the digital age.
Emphasizes the need for online monitoring and strict criminal enforcement.
Key Legal Lessons Across Cases:
Consent is mandatory: Children cannot be taken without parental consent.
Documentation integrity: Fraudulent surrender deeds and adoption papers are illegal.
Child’s best interest: Adoption must prioritize welfare, identity, and family connections.
Profit motive drives abuse: Financial incentives often lead to illegal adoptions.
Cross-border adoption risks: International adoptions require stringent oversight.
Regulatory reforms are essential: Adoption authorities and courts play a critical role in safeguarding children.
RELATED Blog
comments