Case Law On Mob Justice And Vigilantism In Bangladesh
1. The Killing of Samiul Alam Rajon (2015, Sylhet)
Facts:
Samiul Alam Rajon, a 13-year-old boy, was accused by a mob of theft in Kumargaon, near Sylhet.
A large crowd tied him to a pole and brutally beat him. He died due to the injuries sustained.
A video of the incident circulated widely, causing public outrage.
Legal Issues:
Violation of the fundamental right to life under the Bangladesh Constitution (Articles 32 and 35).
Criminal liability of the mob: whether the attackers could be prosecuted under murder provisions.
The role of suspicion versus proof: the boy was punished without any formal investigation.
Judicial Response:
Thirteen people were charged with murder.
Four main perpetrators were sentenced to death, and others received prison terms.
Significance:
This case set a precedent that extreme mob violence, even against minors, is punishable as murder.
Highlighted the role of media and social outrage in prompting judicial action.
2. The Killing of Taslima Begum Renu (2019, Dhaka)
Facts:
Taslima Begum Renu, around 40 years old, was accused by a mob of attempting to abduct a child while visiting a school in North Badda, Dhaka.
Despite no evidence, she was beaten to death in front of the school.
Legal Issues:
Protection of innocent individuals from baseless accusations.
Accountability of individuals participating in vigilante acts.
Upholding the rule of law and discouraging mob justice.
Judicial Response:
One person was sentenced to death and four others to life imprisonment.
The court condemned the act as “barbaric” and emphasized the need to enforce criminal law strictly.
Significance:
Reinforced that suspicion cannot justify vigilante violence.
Highlighted delays in prosecution and challenges in ensuring justice in mob cases.
3. The Killing of Abdullah Al Masud (2024, Rajshahi University area)
Facts:
Abdullah Al Masud, a former student leader with a prosthetic leg, was buying medicine for his newborn daughter when he was attacked by a mob.
He died on the way to the hospital after being beaten.
Legal Issues:
Vulnerability of citizens to mob attacks even for minor suspicions.
Failure of the state to prevent mob violence and provide timely protection.
Judicial Response:
While the specific sentencing was not widely reported, the government declared a “zero tolerance” policy against mob justice, showing official recognition of the severity of such incidents.
Significance:
Illustrated that mob violence is not restricted to rural areas but can occur in urban and university settings.
Highlighted the systemic weaknesses in law enforcement and public order.
4. The Killing of Kazal Miah (2023, Magura)
Facts:
Kazal Miah, 35, was accused of stealing cattle in Magura Sadar Upazila.
A mob severely beat him, and he died despite being taken to the hospital.
Legal Issues:
Abuse of collective action to punish perceived wrongdoing without legal authority.
Rural vulnerability: weaker law enforcement in villages allows mob justice to thrive.
Judicial Response:
A police case was filed, but the pace of investigation was slow, reflecting the challenges in prosecuting collective violence in rural areas.
Significance:
Showed recurring patterns of rural mob justice triggered by suspicion of theft.
Emphasized the gap between law enforcement and community action.
5. The Killing of Tofazzal Hossain (2024, Dhaka)
Facts:
Tofazzal Hossain, a mentally unstable man, was accused of stealing cell phones near a university campus.
A group of students beat him to death with cricket bats.
Legal Issues:
Vulnerability of mentally unstable individuals to mob violence.
Campus violence and involvement of political/student organizations in vigilantism.
Judicial Response:
Six students were arrested.
The case sparked national debate about mob justice and the need for stricter enforcement.
Significance:
Highlighted the dangers of mob violence even in educated, urban settings.
Raised awareness of the need for protecting vulnerable populations.
Key Takeaways from these Cases
Mob justice violates constitutional rights: Every case involved denial of due process and the right to life.
Common triggers: Suspicion of theft, rumors of child abduction, and rumors about individuals’ behavior.
Systemic issues: Delays in investigation, weak enforcement, and social acceptance of vigilante acts perpetuate mob violence.
Judicial approach: Courts have imposed strict punishments (death and life imprisonment) when cases reach them, emphasizing deterrence.
Social awareness: Public outrage, media coverage, and viral videos have been catalysts for judicial action.
RELATED Blog
comments