Case Law On Terrorism Prosecutions In Bangladesh
Terrorism Prosecutions in Bangladesh – Case Law
1. Jama’at-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh (JMB) Series Bombings – 17 August 2005
Facts:
JMB, a banned militant Islamist organization, detonated bombs simultaneously across almost all districts of Bangladesh.
Targeted government offices, courts, and public areas. Hundreds of bombs were planted, though casualties were limited due to warnings given by the group.
Many members of JMB were arrested and charged under anti-terrorism laws, Explosives Act, and Criminal Code provisions.
Legal Issues:
Whether membership in a banned organization and involvement in coordinated attacks constituted terrorism under Bangladeshi law.
Liability of individuals in a conspiracy across multiple districts.
Whether evidence collected by police was admissible in special tribunals.
Judgment & Principles:
Several JMB members were convicted, with sentences ranging from long-term imprisonment to death for leaders.
Court held that mass coordinated attacks were sufficient to prove terrorism and conspiracy.
Principle: Membership and active participation in banned militant activities constitute sufficient basis for conviction in terrorism prosecutions.
2. Chattogram Court Bomb Attack – 29 November 2005
Facts:
A bomb exploded at a court check-post in Chattogram, killing a police officer and injuring others.
The attack was claimed by JMB.
Accused included the local commander of JMB and other operatives involved in planning the attack.
Legal Issues:
Attacks on judiciary infrastructure elevate the offense to aggravated terrorism.
Handling trials for accused who were absconding at the time of proceedings.
Appropriate sentencing: death penalty versus life imprisonment.
Judgment & Principles:
The tribunal sentenced the local leader to death and co-conspirators to life imprisonment.
Principle: Terrorism targeting state institutions or judiciary attracts maximum sentences.
Courts emphasized the deterrent effect of severe punishment to maintain law and order.
3. 21 August 2004 Dhaka Grenade Attack
Facts:
Grenade attack on an opposition political rally in Dhaka, killing dozens and injuring hundreds.
Accused were charged with conspiracy, murder, and terrorism-related offenses.
Legal Issues:
Whether political leaders could be linked to terrorist acts.
Proving chain of causation: who provided grenades, who carried out the attack, who conspired.
Procedural validity of investigation and charge-sheet.
Judgment & Principles:
Initial convictions were handed down, including death sentences for key perpetrators.
Later, higher courts reviewed the procedural aspects and acquitted many accused due to flaws in investigation.
Principle: Terrorism prosecutions require strict adherence to due process and evidentiary standards; procedural lapses can overturn convictions.
4. Udichi Cultural Organization Bombing – 8 December 2005
Facts:
Bombs exploded at the offices of Udichi, a cultural organization, killing multiple people.
Attack was motivated by ideological opposition to secular/cultural organizations, perpetrated by JMB members.
Legal Issues:
Whether ideological motivations (targeting cultural/religious organizations) fall under terrorism law.
Proper evidence linking accused to planning and execution of attack.
Judgment & Principles:
Courts sentenced multiple JMB operatives to death, upheld on appeal.
Principle: Terrorism laws cover both state-directed attacks and ideologically motivated mass violence.
5. Observations from Terrorism Trials in Bangladesh
Although not a single case, general trends emerge from multiple terrorism prosecutions:
Special tribunals are commonly used for terrorism trials.
Sentences vary widely: death for leaders, life imprisonment for operatives.
Procedural defects, weak evidence, or delays can result in acquittals or reduced sentences.
Courts emphasize linking accused to planning, execution, or membership in banned groups to establish terrorism liability.
Key Takeaways from the Cases
Terrorism prosecutions often involve conspiracy, mass violence, and organizational membership.
Attacks on state institutions or judiciary attract the heaviest penalties.
Evidence and procedural fairness are critical; flawed investigation can undermine convictions.
Terrorism laws in Bangladesh also cover ideologically motivated attacks on civilians.
Courts frequently use special tribunals, but standard evidentiary principles still apply.
RELATED Blog
comments