Case Law On Uae Wildlife And Environmental Protection
Case 1: Illegal Hunting of Gazelles in a Wildlife Reserve
Facts:
Three individuals entered a wildlife sanctuary in Al Ain without authorization and hunted gazelles using Saluki hunting dogs. They were caught after causing a disturbance in the reserve and were in possession of hunting equipment and firearms.
Legal Framework:
Federal Law No. 24 of 1999 (Protection and Development of Wildlife)
Abu Dhabi Law on Hunting and Wildlife (Law No. 22 of 2005)
Outcome:
The court sentenced all three to imprisonment for one year and fines for violating hunting and wildlife protection laws. One individual received an additional sentence for assaulting a sanctuary employee.
Significance:
Hunting of protected species without authorization is a criminal offense.
Use of vehicles, hunting dogs, or firearms in a reserve is considered an aggravating factor.
Protecting both the animals and the reserve itself is central to enforcement.
Lesson:
Illegal hunting in a reserve triggers both criminal liability and financial penalties, demonstrating the UAE’s strict approach to wildlife protection.
Case 2: Illegal Hunting Using Falcons
Facts:
A group of individuals used trained falcons to hunt small game in prohibited areas. Falconry is a traditional practice in the UAE but requires adherence to strict licensing and designated zones.
Legal Framework:
Federal Law on Wildlife Protection
Environmental Agency regulations for falconry and hunting zones
Outcome:
The individuals were arrested and charged for illegal hunting. Confiscation of hunting equipment and falcons was ordered, and they faced fines and possible imprisonment.
Significance:
Traditional practices such as falconry are legal only under strict regulatory compliance.
Wildlife protection law can supersede cultural practices when public interest and conservation are at stake.
Lesson:
Even culturally sanctioned hunting methods must comply with modern regulations to avoid criminal liability.
Case 3: Illegal Trade in Protected Animals
Facts:
An individual in Sharjah was found trading endangered animals, including foxes and other protected species, without authorization. These species were listed under UAE law and international conservation agreements.
Legal Framework:
Federal Law No. 22 of 2016 (Protection of Endangered Species)
CITES regulations adopted by the UAE
Outcome:
The animals were confiscated and transferred to official wildlife reserves. The trader was referred to the Public Prosecution for criminal charges and possible imprisonment.
Significance:
Trading or possession of protected species is a criminal offense.
UAE law aligns with international standards for endangered species protection.
Lesson:
Illegal wildlife trade carries severe legal consequences, and enforcement extends to both individuals and networks involved in trafficking.
Case 4: Habitat Damage in Protected Wetlands
Facts:
A group entered the Al Wathba Wetland Reserve in Abu Dhabi without a permit and caused significant damage to the habitat, including trampling sensitive areas and disturbing bird nesting sites.
Legal Framework:
Federal Law on Environmental Protection
Abu Dhabi Environmental Agency regulations on protected areas
Outcome:
The individuals were fined a total of AED 165,000 for unauthorized access and habitat destruction. The case emphasized environmental damage as a criminally relevant act.
Significance:
Environmental crimes include habitat destruction, not just harm to individual animals.
Monetary fines reflect the seriousness of ecological damage and act as deterrents.
Lesson:
Legal protection extends to ecosystems; unauthorized entry or activity can trigger heavy penalties.
Case 5: Possession of Dangerous Exotic Animals
Facts:
An individual kept a cheetah and a leopard in a private residence without a license. These animals are considered dangerous and require strict permits.
Legal Framework:
Federal Law No. 22 of 2016 (Regulation of Ownership of Dangerous Animals)
Federal Law No. 18 of 2016 (Animal Welfare)
Outcome:
The individual faced imprisonment and a fine of up to AED 500,000. The animals were confiscated and relocated to a licensed wildlife facility.
Significance:
Unauthorized private ownership of wild or dangerous animals is criminalized.
Animal welfare laws intersect with environmental protection to prevent exploitation.
Lesson:
Compliance with licensing regulations is mandatory; failure carries severe criminal and financial consequences.
Case 6: Transnational Environmental Crime (“Operation Green Justice”)
Facts:
The UAE coordinated an international operation targeting illegal wildlife, logging, and marine resource exploitation across multiple countries. The operation uncovered thousands of illegally harvested plants, timber, and marine species.
Legal Framework:
UAE Federal Laws on Wildlife and Environmental Protection
International cooperation agreements for environmental crime
Outcome:
25 suspects were arrested, and the illegal goods were confiscated. Those involved faced criminal prosecution under UAE law and international environmental agreements.
Significance:
UAE enforces environmental protection at both domestic and international levels.
Transnational criminal networks dealing in wildlife and natural resources can be prosecuted under UAE law.
Lesson:
Environmental protection is not limited to national borders; transnational enforcement demonstrates the UAE’s commitment to combating large-scale environmental crimes.
Summary of Principles from these Cases:
Hunting, possession, or trade of protected species is a criminal offense.
Unauthorized entry into protected areas is punishable.
Cultural practices like falconry require strict legal compliance.
Habitat protection is central, not just the protection of individual species.
Private ownership of dangerous exotic animals is heavily regulated.
UAE participates actively in transnational environmental enforcement.
RELATED Blog
comments