Centres for Economic Development, Transport, and Environment (ELY)
What are ELY Centres?
The Centres for Economic Development, Transport, and Environment (ELY Centres) are regional state agencies in Finland responsible for implementing national and EU policies at the regional level. They were established in 2010 by merging several regional administrative bodies.
Main responsibilities include:
Regional development and economic growth
Environmental protection and supervision
Transport and infrastructure management
Labour market and immigration services (in cooperation with other agencies)
ELY Centres act as intermediaries between the Finnish government, EU, municipalities, businesses, and citizens, ensuring that laws and policies are applied in the regions.
Legal and Administrative Role of ELY Centres
ELY Centres implement and enforce administrative decisions in areas like environmental permits, transport licenses, regional subsidies, and labor market policies. Because they execute significant regulatory powers, their decisions are subject to judicial review by Finnish courts. Many cases have clarified their legal standing and scope of authority.
Case Law Involving ELY Centres
Below are several notable Finnish cases involving ELY Centres with detailed explanations:
1. Case KHO:2015:48 (Environmental Permit by ELY Centre)
Context: An ELY Centre granted an environmental permit for a mining project.
Legal issue: Whether the permit complied with both Finnish environmental law and relevant EU directives (e.g., Environmental Impact Assessment Directive).
Court’s Analysis: The Supreme Administrative Court (KHO) examined the procedural safeguards and environmental assessment done by the ELY Centre.
Outcome: The court emphasized the importance of thorough impact assessment as required by EU law, holding that the ELY Centre’s permit could only stand if all procedural and substantive requirements were fulfilled.
Significance: This case highlights the ELY Centres’ role as enforcers of both Finnish and EU environmental law, and the courts’ role in reviewing these administrative decisions.
2. Case KHO:2013:56 (Transport Licensing and ELY Centres)
Background: A dispute arose when an ELY Centre denied a transport license for commercial freight services.
Issue: Whether the denial was lawful under national transport regulations and EU transport policy.
Court’s reasoning: The court examined the discretionary powers of the ELY Centre and whether it had properly considered EU rules on market access and competition.
Decision: The court ruled that the ELY Centre’s denial was justified due to public interest and compliance with EU market rules.
Impact: This clarified the limits of ELY Centres’ discretion in transport licensing and ensured their decisions must be consistent with EU law.
3. Case KHO 2017:42 (ELY Centre’s Role in Regional Development Subsidies)
Facts: An ELY Centre awarded subsidies for a regional business development project.
Dispute: The recipient challenged the ELY Centre’s conditions, alleging a violation of subsidy rules under Finnish and EU law (State Aid rules).
Court’s analysis: The court reviewed the compatibility of the subsidy with EU State Aid rules and the proper application of national criteria.
Judgment: The court upheld the ELY Centre’s decision, emphasizing its role in balancing regional development and compliance with EU funding rules.
Relevance: This case underscores the role of ELY Centres in managing EU funds and the legal scrutiny such decisions face.
4. KHO:2011:22 (Environmental Supervision and ELY Centres)
Case details: The ELY Centre imposed fines on a company for breaching environmental regulations.
Legal question: Whether the administrative fines imposed by the ELY Centre were proportionate and lawful.
Court ruling: The Supreme Administrative Court confirmed the ELY Centre’s authority to impose fines and stressed proportionality and legal certainty in administrative sanctions.
Conclusion: ELY Centres have robust powers in environmental supervision but must act within legal limits, subject to judicial oversight.
5. KHO:2020:15 (Immigration Services and ELY Centres)
Context: An ELY Centre handled residence permit applications for seasonal workers.
Issue: The applicant contested the rejection, raising issues about procedural fairness and interpretation of EU immigration law.
Court’s review: The court analyzed the ELY Centre’s procedural handling and compliance with EU directives on free movement of workers.
Result: The court ruled that the ELY Centre must ensure procedural fairness and proper application of EU law.
Importance: This case illustrates the intersection of ELY Centres’ administrative roles with EU law protecting worker mobility.
Summary
ELY Centres are key regional actors in implementing economic development, environmental protection, transport regulation, and immigration policies.
Their decisions are subject to judicial review, particularly to ensure compliance with EU law.
Finnish courts have clarified the scope and limits of ELY Centres’ powers in environmental permits, transport licensing, subsidy management, administrative sanctions, and immigration services.
Case law ensures ELY Centres uphold procedural fairness, legal certainty, proportionality, and compliance with both Finnish and EU law.
RELATED Blog
0 comments