Child Abuse And Neglect Offences In Finland
Child Abuse and Neglect in Finland: Legal Framework
Criminal Code of Finland (Rikoslaki)
Chapter 21, Section 3: Child sexual abuse.
Chapter 21, Section 4: Gross sexual abuse of a child.
Chapter 21, Section 5: Child neglect and endangerment.
Chapter 21, Section 6: Physical abuse of a child.
Key Principles:
Children are protected from all forms of physical, sexual, and psychological harm.
Offences cover both acts of commission (abuse) and acts of omission (neglect).
Finland emphasizes child welfare, meaning courts may consider rehabilitation and protection measures alongside criminal sanctions.
Other Relevant Laws:
Child Welfare Act (Lastensuojelulaki) – allows authorities to intervene when children are at risk, even without criminal prosecution.
Act on Child Custody and Rights (Laki lapsen huollosta ja tapaamisoikeudesta) – emphasizes child’s best interests.
Case Studies
1. KKO 2017:19 – Sexual Abuse by a Guardian
Facts
A foster guardian was accused of repeated sexual abuse of a child in their care.
Legal Issue
How does Finnish law determine severity and custodial responsibility in child sexual abuse?
Court’s Reasoning
The Court examined:
Frequency and duration of abuse
Psychological harm to the child
Position of trust and authority of the guardian
Finnish law considers position of trust as an aggravating factor.
Outcome
Defendant convicted of gross sexual abuse of a child, sentenced to long-term imprisonment.
Significance
Reinforces the enhanced protection for children under guardianship or care.
Trust and authority increase the severity of punishment.
2. KKO 2014:28 – Neglect Leading to Physical Harm
Facts
Parents failed to provide adequate food and medical care, leading to malnutrition and illness in a 3-year-old child.
Legal Issue
Is neglect causing harm considered criminal, even without direct physical abuse?
Court’s Reasoning
Courts hold parents criminally liable if omission causes significant risk or harm to the child.
Both intentional neglect and gross negligence are punishable.
Outcome
Parents convicted of child endangerment and neglect, received fines and probation; children placed under state supervision.
Significance
Highlights that omission is equally criminalized.
Child welfare interventions may accompany criminal sanctions.
3. KKO 2016:12 – Physical Abuse by a Parent
Facts
A parent physically beat their child repeatedly with objects, causing injuries.
Legal Issue
How is physical abuse assessed under Chapter 21, Section 6?
Court’s Reasoning
Court considered:
Degree of injury (bruises, fractures)
Intentionality
Repetition of acts
Physical punishment is criminal if it endangers health or development.
Outcome
Parent convicted of gross child abuse, sentenced to imprisonment, and parental rights suspended.
Significance
Confirms Finland’s strict zero-tolerance approach to physical punishment causing harm.
4. KKO 2018:22 – Child Sexual Exploitation Online
Facts
Adult engaged in online sexual communication with minors and attempted to arrange meetings.
Legal Issue
Can online sexual exploitation be prosecuted under child sexual abuse laws?
Court’s Reasoning
Finnish law treats online sexual exploitation as equivalent to sexual abuse if it targets a child and aims to sexual gratification.
Use of deception or grooming is an aggravating factor.
Outcome
Defendant convicted of child sexual exploitation, sentenced to imprisonment; access to minors restricted.
Significance
Shows Finland’s adaptation of child protection laws to digital environments.
5. KKO 2015:41 – Psychological Abuse and Neglect
Facts
Parent consistently humiliated and psychologically threatened child, restricting social contact and schooling.
Legal Issue
Does psychological abuse alone constitute child endangerment?
Court’s Reasoning
Repeated psychological harm that jeopardizes development qualifies as criminal child abuse.
Courts consider long-term effects on mental health and social functioning.
Outcome
Parent convicted of child endangerment through psychological abuse, received probation and mandatory counseling.
Significance
Confirms recognition of psychological harm as criminal.
Emphasizes child’s emotional and social well-being.
6. KKO 2012:17 – Sexual Abuse by Sibling or Relative
Facts
Older sibling sexually abused younger sibling repeatedly at home.
Legal Issue
Are intra-family offences treated differently under Finnish law?
Court’s Reasoning
Position of trust and dependency increases severity, similar to parent or guardian abuse.
Courts also consider the age gap and power imbalance.
Outcome
Conviction for gross sexual abuse of a child, custodial sentence imposed, psychological counseling mandated.
Significance
Family relationship aggravates abuse charges.
Rehabilitation of both victim and offender considered.
7. KKO 2019:15 – Child Neglect in Institutional Care
Facts
Staff at a daycare center neglected supervision, resulting in injuries to children.
Legal Issue
Can institutional neglect result in criminal liability?
Court’s Reasoning
Institutions have heightened duty of care.
Negligence causing physical or emotional harm to children constitutes criminal child endangerment.
Outcome
Daycare staff convicted; fines and probation imposed; institutional procedures revised.
Significance
Confirms liability extends beyond family to professional caregivers.
Highlights Finland’s focus on child welfare in institutional settings.
Key Themes in Finnish Child Abuse and Neglect Law
Criminalization of All Forms of Harm – Physical, sexual, psychological abuse and neglect are punishable.
Position of Trust Increases Severity – Guardians, parents, and institutional staff face harsher penalties.
Psychological Harm Recognized – Not just physical injuries, but emotional and social harm are considered.
Digital Environments Included – Online grooming and exploitation are prosecuted under child sexual abuse statutes.
Preventive and Protective Measures – Child Welfare Act allows state intervention, alongside criminal sanctions.
Family and Institutional Contexts – Both domestic and institutional abuse are subject to liability.
Combination of Rehabilitation and Punishment – Courts balance punitive measures with child protection and rehabilitation of offenders when possible.
RELATED Blog
comments