Claims Tied To Roadway Rutting From Overloaded Construction Trucks
Claims Tied to Roadway Rutting from Overloaded Construction Trucks
Roadway rutting refers to permanent depressions or grooves in the wheel paths of pavements. Rutting is a common pavement distress that can compromise safety, ride quality, and service life. In construction and infrastructure projects, rutting often leads to claims and disputes, especially when overloaded trucks or heavy equipment are involved.
Key Causes of Rutting
Overloading of Construction Vehicles
Trucks carrying materials above specified axle load limits cause excessive stress on pavement layers, leading to rutting.
Inadequate Pavement Design
Pavement thickness, subgrade strength, and material selection may be insufficient for expected traffic loads.
Subgrade Weakness
Poor soil compaction or low bearing capacity exacerbates deformation under heavy loads.
Material Deficiencies
Use of improper asphalt mix, insufficient binder, or poorly compacted base/sub-base layers.
Construction Defects
Uneven compaction, improper layer thickness, or early traffic exposure before curing.
Types of Claims
Contractual Claims
Project owners may claim from contractors for early pavement failure.
Contractors may file counterclaims if rutting is due to overloading by third-party trucks.
Insurance Claims
Damage due to overloading may trigger insurance disputes, especially in PPP projects.
Third-Party Liability
If rutting leads to vehicle accidents or road safety hazards.
Illustrative Case Laws
Case 1: State Highway Authority vs. Contractor
Issue: Newly paved highway developed wheel-path ruts within 3 months.
Cause: Investigation revealed frequent use of overloaded material trucks exceeding design axle loads.
Outcome: Contractor required to rehabilitate the affected sections; authority revised traffic control and load management for construction vehicles.
Case 2: Urban Municipality Pavement Dispute
Issue: Residential street pavement exhibited severe rutting during construction.
Cause: Subgrade was weak, and construction trucks exceeded legal load limits.
Outcome: Arbitration apportioned liability between contractor and municipality; contractor performed patch repairs.
Case 3: Airport Access Road Claim
Issue: Pavement ruts on airport service road due to frequent heavy equipment movement.
Cause: Trucks used for concrete and asphalt hauling were overloaded, and pavement thickness was marginally designed.
Outcome: Contractor compensated for partial overlay costs; airport authority revised specifications for future construction traffic.
Case 4: Toll Road PPP Project
Issue: Rutting appeared on a toll road section before opening to public traffic.
Cause: Construction traffic control was inadequate; repeated overloaded truck movement over subgrade caused permanent deformation.
Outcome: Arbitration held contractor responsible for reinforcing affected areas; insurance did not cover rutting from overloaded construction trucks.
Case 5: State Bridge Approach Road
Issue: Rutting and pavement depressions near bridge approaches.
Cause: Combination of overloaded trucks and improperly compacted sub-base layer.
Outcome: Contractor paid for remediation; project engineer required stricter load monitoring during construction.
Case 6: Industrial Park Internal Roads
Issue: Rutting reported shortly after completion of internal asphalt roads.
Cause: Overloaded trucks transporting heavy machinery repeatedly used the newly laid asphalt before it fully cured.
Outcome: Dispute resolved through arbitration; contractor implemented load limits and schedule adjustments, with cost sharing for overlay works.
Lessons from These Disputes
Enforcing Weight Limits: Overloaded trucks are a common cause of early rutting; weight control is essential.
Design Considerations: Pavement thickness and materials must account for construction traffic during project execution.
Monitoring and Documentation: Load logs, traffic management records, and material certificates are critical in defending or making claims.
Arbitration Trends: Liability is often shared, but contractors are generally responsible if design and compaction are per specification and overloading is uncontrolled.
Preventive Measures: Temporary matting, staged traffic, or limiting heavy truck use can reduce rutting risk.
RELATED Blog
comments