Copyright Infringement And Piracy
Copyright is a legal right granted to the creator of an original work, such as literary works, music, films, software, artistic works, and more. It protects the creator’s exclusive rights to:
Reproduce the work
Distribute it
Perform or display it publicly
Create derivative works
Copyright Infringement occurs when someone violates these exclusive rights without permission, either knowingly or unknowingly. Common forms include:
Copying and selling books, movies, or software without authorization.
Uploading copyrighted material on websites without license.
Creating derivative works without consent.
Piracy is an illegal form of copyright infringement, often associated with large-scale unauthorized distribution of copyrighted content, especially movies, music, and software.
Types of Copyright Infringement
Direct Infringement – Copying or distributing copyrighted material directly.
Contributory Infringement – Helping or encouraging someone else to infringe.
Vicarious Infringement – Profiting from someone else’s infringement while having the ability to stop it.
Case Laws on Copyright Infringement and Piracy
Here are five important cases with detailed explanations:
1. Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios (1984)
Facts:
Sony manufactured the Betamax video recorder. Universal Studios sued Sony claiming that the recorder allowed users to illegally record copyrighted TV shows.
Issue:
Does the sale of a copying device constitute contributory copyright infringement if it has substantial non-infringing uses?
Decision:
The U.S. Supreme Court held Sony was not liable because the device was capable of substantial non-infringing uses. Recording TV shows for personal, time-shifted viewing was considered fair use.
Significance:
Established the concept of "substantial non-infringing use".
Important for technologies like DVRs, VCRs, and even software platforms.
2. MGM Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. (2005)
Facts:
Grokster distributed peer-to-peer file-sharing software that allowed users to download copyrighted music and movies.
Issue:
Can software distributors be held liable for users’ copyright infringement?
Decision:
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Grokster liable because it actively encouraged infringement and profited from it.
Significance:
Differentiated between Sony (non-infringing use) and Grokster (inducement of infringement).
Established the inducement theory in copyright law.
3. Apple Computer, Inc. v. Franklin Computer Corp. (1983)
Facts:
Franklin copied Apple’s operating system (OS) for its personal computers.
Issue:
Are computer programs protected under copyright law?
Decision:
The court held that computer software is copyrightable as a literary work, and Franklin’s copying constituted infringement.
Significance:
Recognized software as copyrightable subject matter.
Paved the way for legal protection of software against piracy.
4. Harvard College v. Canada (2002) (known as the Canada Copyright Case)
Facts:
The case dealt with whether universities could photocopy portions of textbooks for students without violating copyright.
Issue:
Does educational use constitute fair dealing under copyright law?
Decision:
The court ruled that reproducing limited portions of textbooks for educational purposes was fair dealing, but large-scale copying could be infringement.
Significance:
Highlighted limitations and exceptions to copyright, especially in education.
Important for understanding non-commercial infringement vs. piracy.
5. Cambridge University Press v. Patton (2012, USA)
Facts:
Students were uploading PDFs of copyrighted textbooks to a university network. Cambridge sued for infringement.
Issue:
Does making textbooks available on a network without authorization constitute copyright infringement?
Decision:
The court ruled in favor of Cambridge, holding that unauthorized uploading of textbooks constituted direct infringement.
Significance:
Reinforced the importance of digital copyright enforcement.
Clarified liability in academic and digital settings.
Summary Table of Cases
| Case | Year | Jurisdiction | Key Principle |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sony v. Universal City Studios | 1984 | USA | Non-infringing use defense |
| MGM v. Grokster | 2005 | USA | Inducement liability |
| Apple v. Franklin | 1983 | USA | Software copyrightability |
| Harvard College v. Canada | 2002 | Canada | Educational fair dealing |
| Cambridge v. Patton | 2012 | USA | Digital textbook infringement |
Key Takeaways:
Copyright infringement occurs when exclusive rights are violated.
Piracy is large-scale unauthorized distribution.
Fair use/fair dealing can limit infringement liability.
Technology has forced courts to balance innovation vs. copyright protection.
Courts look at intent, commercial gain, and the scope of use.
RELATED Blog
comments