Copyright Protection For 3D Holographic Performances And Art Installations.
đź“ś Copyright in 3D Holographic Performances and Art Installations
3D holographic works combine visual projection, sound, motion capture, and interactive elements. They raise unique copyright questions because they blend:
Pre-existing works (songs, scripts, or art)
New technology (3D projections, holograms, AR/VR components)
Live or simulated performance
Key copyright questions:
Who owns the copyright?
The hologram creator, the original performer, or the software developer?
Derivative work issues:
If a hologram recreates a deceased performer, does it infringe the original performer’s rights?
Originality:
Does the combination of holographic projection, choreography, and sound constitute a new work eligible for protection?
⚖️ Key Case Laws
1. Thaler v. Perlmutter (U.S., 2023)
Facts: Stephen Thaler applied for copyright in works created entirely by an AI system.
Holding: Rejected because copyright law requires human authorship.
Relevance to 3D holographic art:
If AI generates a hologram autonomously without creative human input, it cannot be copyrighted.
Human direction in choreography, animation, or sound design is required.
2. Zarya of the Dawn (U.S., 2023)
Facts: AI-generated images in a comic book were not copyrightable; human-authored text was protected.
Relevance:
Human-curated holographic performances (choreography, set design, editing) can be copyrighted.
Pure AI-generated holograms, without human creative choices, are not protected.
3. Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. (U.S., 1999)
Facts: Exact reproductions of public-domain artworks were not copyrightable.
Relevance:
Holographic recreations of pre-existing art (paintings, sculptures, or historical performances) cannot claim copyright for faithful reproduction.
Creative adaptation, layering, or transformation of these works can be copyrightable.
4. Meshwerks v. Toyota Motor Sales (U.S., 2008)
Facts: Digital 3D models replicating Toyota vehicles lacked sufficient originality.
Relevance:
Holographic installations that simply replicate real-world objects or performances without creative interpretation may lack originality.
Novel choreography, original visual effects, or interactive elements could constitute copyrightable expression.
5. Right of Publicity and Holographic Performances – Estate of Tupac Shakur v. Dr. Dre (U.S., 2012)
Facts: Tupac’s holographic performance at Coachella raised legal concerns about the use of his likeness posthumously.
Holding/Reasoning:
Even if a hologram is technologically created, using a deceased performer’s likeness without permission can violate right of publicity, separate from copyright.
Relevance:
Copyright in holographic performances is distinct from personality or performance rights, but unauthorized recreations may still face liability.
6. Rogers v. Koons (U.S., 1992)
Facts: Jeff Koons created a sculpture based on a copyrighted photograph.
Holding: Court ruled it was copyright infringement, despite transformation.
Relevance:
Holographic installations based on copyrighted performances or art must be careful to either transform the work creatively or secure licenses.
7. Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service Co. (U.S., 1991)
Facts: Facts in a phone directory were not copyrightable; only creative selection/arrangement was protected.
Relevance:
Choreography, spatial arrangement, and design of holographic installations can be copyrightable as original expression.
Underlying factual events or historical performances are public domain.
⚖️ Summary Principles for 3D Holographic Works
| Component | Copyright Status |
|---|---|
| AI-generated hologram alone | Not copyrightable |
| Choreography, visual effects, and sound design | Copyrightable if original |
| Recreation of historical performance | Public domain unless enhanced creatively |
| Use of deceased performer’s likeness | Subject to publicity/right-of-personality laws |
| Transformation/adaptation of copyrighted work | Requires permission or must be sufficiently transformative |
âś… Practical Implications
Human authorship is key: Choreographers, sound designers, and visual artists must contribute original work.
Derivative work caution: Avoid reproducing copyrighted performances or art without licenses.
Document creative contributions: Keep detailed records of edits, choreography, and technical design to assert copyright.
Rights of performers: Even holographic performances must respect personality/publicity rights.
AI-assisted holograms: Copyright may attach only to human-directed elements.
RELATED Blog
comments