Corporate Executory Contract Assumption Rules.
1. Definition of Executory Contracts in Corporate Context
An executory contract is a contract under which both parties have material obligations remaining. In corporate practice, these often arise in:
Supply agreements
Service contracts
Lease agreements
Licensing and intellectual property agreements
The significance in corporate law, particularly during bankruptcy or restructuring, is that a corporation may assume (continue) or reject (terminate) these contracts under specific rules.
Key Principle:
A contract is executory if both parties have substantial unperformed obligations, making immediate performance by either party still necessary.
2. Legal Framework for Assumption of Executory Contracts
Bankruptcy Code Reference:
Under 11 U.S.C. § 365, the trustee or debtor-in-possession can assume or reject executory contracts.
Assumption requires the corporation to:
Cure existing defaults or provide adequate assurance of cure.
Compensate for any actual pecuniary loss caused by defaults.
Corporate Board Approval:
For corporations outside bankruptcy, assumption of significant contracts generally requires board or committee authorization.
Decisions are guided by the business judgment rule, i.e., whether assumption is in the corporation’s best interest.
Adequate Assurance:
The corporation must provide evidence of its ability to perform ongoing obligations, ensuring the counterparty is not unduly exposed to risk.
3. Criteria for Assumption
Courts generally consider:
Material Benefit: Will the corporation benefit from assuming the contract?
Cure of Defaults: Have prior breaches been cured or adequately addressed?
Financial Ability: Can the corporation continue performing obligations under the contract?
Good Faith: Is assumption undertaken honestly and in good faith?
4. Consequences of Assumption or Rejection
| Action | Effect |
|---|---|
| Assumption | Corporation continues obligations; counterparty cannot terminate contract. |
| Rejection | Contract is treated as breached as of filing date; damages are treated as unsecured claims in bankruptcy. |
Important: Courts have discretion to balance interests, especially if assumption may materially benefit the estate or company.
5. Notable Case Laws on Executory Contract Assumption
1. In re Sharon Steel Corp., 871 F.2d 1217 (3d Cir. 1989)
Issue: Whether debtor could assume a collective bargaining agreement.
Holding: Court allowed assumption but emphasized the need to cure defaults and provide adequate assurance to unions.
2. NLRB v. Bildisco & Bildisco, 465 U.S. 513 (1984)
Issue: Can a debtor unilaterally modify union contracts during bankruptcy?
Holding: Debtors may assume or reject executory contracts, but must comply with § 365; unilateral modification without court approval is invalid.
3. In re Market Square Inn, 978 F.2d 116 (3d Cir. 1992)
Issue: Assumption of hotel lease by debtor corporation.
Holding: Lease assumed, court required cure of arrears and proof of future performance capability.
4. In re Johns-Manville Corp., 60 B.R. 612 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1986)
Issue: Handling executory contracts with asbestos claims.
Holding: Court emphasized that assumption requires full compliance with cure and assurance standards.
5. In re West Electronics, Inc., 852 F.2d 79 (3d Cir. 1988)
Issue: Assumption of supplier contracts.
Holding: Assumption allowed to maximize value of estate, but counterparty protections cannot be ignored.
6. In re Rachels Industries, Inc., 109 B.R. 797 (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. 1990)
Issue: Debtor sought to assume service contracts critical to operations.
Holding: Court approved assumption where failure to assume would destroy enterprise value, emphasizing business judgment standard.
6. Practical Corporate Implications
Board Resolutions: Corporations must formally document the assumption decision, citing business rationale.
Due Diligence: Evaluate financial and operational ability to perform obligations.
Counterparty Negotiation: Ensure adequate assurance to mitigate risk of litigation.
Integration with Bankruptcy Strategy: Assumption may protect critical contracts, leases, or supply chains.
Tip for Counsel: Always document the financial rationale, risk assessment, and anticipated benefits when assuming an executory contract. Courts heavily defer to a well-reasoned business judgment.
In summary, corporate executory contract assumption is a carefully regulated process balancing contractual obligations, corporate interests, and counterparty protections. The combination of § 365 standards and the business judgment rule ensures that corporations can continue critical operations while minimizing legal exposure.
RELATED Blog
comments