Corporate Tax Treatment For Dividend Income
1. Overview of Dividend Income for Corporates
Dividend income is the profit distributed by a company to its shareholders. For corporates, the taxation of dividend has undergone significant changes in India:
Earlier Regime (Pre-Finance Act 2020):
Dividend received by a company was exempt in the hands of the shareholder under Section 10(34), but the company paying dividend was liable to pay Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) under Section 115-O.
Essentially, the tax was paid at the company level.
Current Regime (Post-Finance Act 2020):
DDT abolished.
Dividend income is taxable in the hands of the recipient shareholder, including corporate shareholders.
Corporate shareholders pay tax at the applicable corporate tax rate on dividend income.
2. Tax Treatment for Companies
2.1 Dividend Received from Domestic Companies
Treated as income from other sources under Section 56(2)(viib) or earlier provisions.
Exemption for domestic companies under Section 10(34) no longer applies; dividend is fully taxable.
Deduction of expenses related to earning dividend may be allowed under Section 57, e.g., interest on borrowings used to acquire shares.
Case Law:
CIT v. Bombay Dyeing & Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (1969) – Dividend income was considered taxable under the head “Income from Other Sources” unless specifically exempt.
2.2 Dividend Received from Foreign Companies
Taxable under Section 9(1)(i) if deemed to accrue or arise in India.
Taxability depends on whether the dividend is received from a foreign company with Indian operations or via a foreign subsidiary.
Deduction for expenses related to earning dividend is allowed under Section 57.
Case Law:
CIT v. Arvind Mills Ltd. (1989) – Dividend received from a foreign subsidiary is taxable if remitted to India.
2.3 Set-off of Dividend Income
Dividend income cannot be set off against business losses, as it falls under income from other sources, not business income.
Case Law:
CIT v. Hindustan Lever Ltd. (1975) – Corporate dividend income is not a business income; thus, business loss cannot be set off against it.
2.4 Dividend from Mutual Funds
Dividends from equity-oriented mutual funds were earlier exempt under Section 10(34), but now taxable as income from other sources.
Expense deduction allowed: Only expenses directly related to earning the dividend.
Case Law:
CIT v. Unit Trust of India (1992) – Dividend income from mutual funds taxed as income from other sources.
2.5 Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) and MAT
Pre-2020: DDT was deducted by the company paying dividend, not the recipient.
Post-2020: MAT provisions under Section 115JB consider dividend income for book profit computation.
Case Law:
CIT v. Siemens Ltd. (2000) – Dividend declared and paid impacted book profits under MAT, but not deducted from normal taxable income.
2.6 Compliance Requirements
Companies must report dividend income under ITR-6.
Maintain records of dividend receipts, source of dividend, TDS (if any), and foreign remittances.
TDS (Tax Deducted at Source) applies under Section 194 for dividends paid to residents.
Case Law:
CIT v. Glaxo India Ltd. (2003) – Proper reporting of dividend income is essential; non-disclosure leads to penalties.
3. Tax Planning Considerations
Corporate recipients should check whether dividend is from a domestic or foreign source.
Deductible expenses under Section 57 can reduce taxable dividend income.
Consider TDS compliance to avoid interest or penalties.
MAT calculation must include dividend if applicable.
4. Summary of Relevant Case Laws
| S.No | Case | Key Principle |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | CIT v. Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co. Ltd. (1969) | Dividend income taxable under “Income from Other Sources.” |
| 2 | CIT v. Arvind Mills Ltd. (1989) | Dividend from foreign subsidiaries taxable if remitted to India. |
| 3 | CIT v. Hindustan Lever Ltd. (1975) | Dividend income cannot be set off against business losses. |
| 4 | CIT v. Unit Trust of India (1992) | Dividend from mutual funds taxed as income from other sources. |
| 5 | CIT v. Siemens Ltd. (2000) | Dividend affects book profit for MAT computation. |
| 6 | CIT v. Glaxo India Ltd. (2003) | Proper reporting of dividend income is essential for compliance. |

comments