Covid-Related Criminal Cases In India
1. Violation of Lockdown Orders
During the lockdown imposed to contain Covid-19, many cases were registered against individuals violating the orders under Section 51 and 54 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005, and Section 188 of the IPC (Disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant).
Case Law: State of UP v. Rajesh Gautam (2020)
Facts: The accused violated lockdown orders and were found roaming unnecessarily.
Judgment: The court upheld that violation of lockdown orders is a cognizable offense punishable under the Disaster Management Act and IPC. It emphasized the importance of adhering to government orders to prevent the spread of Covid-19.
Significance: Reinforced that disobedience during pandemic emergencies could attract penal consequences.
2. Spreading Misinformation and Rumors
The spread of false information about Covid-19 was rampant, causing panic. Section 505 IPC (statements conducing to public mischief) was used to prosecute offenders.
Case Law: State v. Manish (2020)
Facts: The accused circulated false news about lockdown extensions and infection rates.
Judgment: The court held that spreading rumors affecting public tranquility during a pandemic is a serious offense. Conviction under Section 505 IPC and Disaster Management Act was upheld.
Significance: Helped control misinformation and maintain public order during the crisis.
3. Quarantine Violations
Many cases involved individuals evading mandatory quarantine, endangering public health. Section 269 and 270 of IPC (negligent and malignant acts likely to spread infection of disease) were used.
Case Law: State of Maharashtra v. Anil Kumar (2021)
Facts: The accused escaped quarantine and mingled with public causing risk of infection.
Judgment: The court convicted the accused under Sections 269 and 270 IPC, emphasizing the duty of individuals to follow quarantine laws for public safety.
Significance: Set a precedent for strict enforcement of quarantine laws to prevent community transmission.
4. Hoarding and Black-marketing of Medical Supplies
Several cases of hoarding and black-marketing of masks, sanitizers, and medicines were reported, violating Essential Commodities Act and IPC provisions.
Case Law: State of Delhi v. Rahul Sharma (2020)
Facts: The accused was found hoarding and selling sanitizer at exorbitant prices.
Judgment: Convicted under Essential Commodities Act and IPC Section 420 (cheating) and 272 (adulteration).
Significance: Sent a strong message to prevent exploitation during the pandemic.
5. Assault on Medical Staff
Several incidents were reported where frontline workers were assaulted by people opposing Covid-related regulations.
Case Law: State of Rajasthan v. Pankaj Meena (2020)
Facts: The accused assaulted healthcare workers trying to enforce Covid safety norms.
Judgment: Convicted under IPC Section 353 (assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of duty) and Disaster Management Act.
Significance: Reinforced protection for medical staff during public health emergencies.
Summary of Relevant Laws Used:
Section 188 IPC: Disobedience to order promulgated by public servant.
Section 269 & 270 IPC: Negligent and malignant acts likely to spread infection.
Section 505 IPC: Statements conducing to public mischief.
Section 353 IPC: Assault on public servant.
Disaster Management Act, 2005: Penalties for breach of Covid regulations.
Essential Commodities Act: Control over hoarding and black-marketing.
RELATED Blog
comments