Criminal Law Responses To Fake Educational Degree Rackets
⚖️ I. Introduction: Fake Educational Degree Rackets
Fake degree rackets involve fabrication, forgery, and sale of counterfeit educational certificates. These activities undermine public trust in the education system and can have serious legal, social, and professional implications.
Under Indian Criminal Law, the following provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) are most often invoked:
Section 420 IPC – Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property.
Section 465 IPC – Punishment for forgery.
Section 468 IPC – Forgery for the purpose of cheating.
Section 471 IPC – Using as genuine a forged document.
Section 120-B IPC – Criminal conspiracy.
Section 34 IPC – Common intention.
Additionally, the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 can apply if public officials are involved, and Information Technology Act, 2000 may apply when digital forgeries are committed.
⚖️ II. Judicial Responses: Major Case Laws
Let’s look at several notable judgments that illustrate how Indian courts have responded to fake degree rackets.
1. Dr. Subramanian Swamy v. Dr. Manmohan Singh & Ors. (2012) 3 SCC 64
Facts:
Although not directly about fake degrees, this case highlighted the need for integrity and honesty among public servants and political figures. The principle here applies strongly to educational fraud cases where fake degrees are used to obtain government positions.
Held:
The Supreme Court emphasized that false representations and fraudulent qualifications strike at the root of public trust. Hence, any such act warrants prosecution under cheating and forgery provisions.
Significance:
It laid the foundation that fraud vitiates everything — any appointment, election, or employment obtained on the basis of forged degrees can be invalidated.
2. State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335
Facts:
Bhajan Lal was accused of possessing false qualifications for a government position.
Although the case mainly dealt with abuse of criminal proceedings, it established a principle applicable to fake degree cases.
Held:
The Supreme Court held that where prima facie evidence exists of forgery and cheating, the investigation must proceed unhindered. Courts must not quash FIRs mechanically.
Significance:
This case is often cited to show that fake degree rackets deserve full criminal investigation since they involve deep-rooted deceit and affect the integrity of public offices.
3. State of Punjab v. Jagjit Singh, (2017) 1 SCC 148
Facts:
The accused obtained employment as a teacher by producing a fake B.Ed. certificate. When the fraud was discovered, his services were terminated and criminal proceedings initiated.
Held:
The Supreme Court held that the possession and use of a fake degree constitutes both forgery and cheating under Sections 468 and 471 IPC. The court observed that mere possession, if knowingly done, is sufficient for conviction.
Significance:
This case firmly established that using a fake educational certificate to obtain employment is a criminal act and not a mere administrative issue.
4. Union of India v. Dattatray, 2008 (3) SCC 570
Facts:
The respondent had submitted a forged engineering degree for a public sector job. After discovery, he claimed leniency as he had served for years.
Held:
The Supreme Court rejected the plea of leniency, stating that fraud and forgery cannot be condoned merely because time has passed or service has been rendered. The appointment obtained through fraud is void ab initio.
Significance:
The Court reinforced that fraudulent employment based on fake degrees cannot be regularized under any compassionate or equitable grounds.
5. Regional Manager, Central Bank of India v. Madhulika Guruprasad Dahir, (2008) 13 SCC 170
Facts:
The employee was found to have produced a forged educational certificate at the time of joining. She argued that the bank did not verify the documents earlier.
Held:
The Supreme Court ruled that submission of forged educational documents amounts to moral turpitude. Termination was justified even if discovered years later.
Significance:
Employers have the right to dismiss employees who obtained positions using fake qualifications — no limitation period applies to fraud.
6. Delhi University Fake Degree Racket Case (2015–2017, Delhi High Court)
Facts:
A racket involving fake DU and IP University degrees was busted. Several accused were found running a printing setup fabricating mark sheets and degree certificates.
Held:
The Delhi High Court emphasized the need for exemplary punishment to deter such rackets, invoking Sections 420, 468, 471, and 120B IPC.
Significance:
The judgment recognized that fake degree rackets are an organized crime affecting the integrity of the education system and public confidence.
7. R. Vishwanatha Pillai v. State of Kerala, (2004) 2 SCC 105
Facts:
An officer obtained employment under a false caste certificate, which was treated analogously to a fake degree case.
Held:
The Supreme Court stated that any benefit obtained by fraud is null and void, and the guilty person cannot retain the post even after years of service.
Significance:
Although involving caste certificates, the ratio decidendi applies equally to educational certificate fraud — fraud vitiates everything.
⚖️ III. Common Legal Outcomes
Criminal prosecution under IPC Sections 420, 465, 468, 471, and 120-B.
Immediate termination of employment or cancellation of admission.
Forfeiture of benefits obtained through fraudulent qualification.
Disqualification from government service and potential imprisonment.
Investigation and crackdown on organized rackets under state police and cybercrime divisions.
⚖️ IV. Conclusion
Indian courts have consistently taken a zero-tolerance approach toward fake educational degree rackets. The judiciary emphasizes that:
“Fraud and deceit are antithetical to fairness and justice. Any benefit obtained by deceit is no benefit in the eyes of law.”
The combined application of IPC provisions, disciplinary proceedings, and constitutional principles ensures that individuals and organized groups engaged in such rackets are severely punished.
RELATED Blog
comments