Criminal Liability For Assault On Health Workers

17 Oct 2025 --
0 Comments

Criminal Liability for Assault on Health Workers in Nepal

🔹 Conceptual Overview

Health workers, including doctors, nurses, paramedics, and public health officials, play a critical role in protecting public health. Assaulting or threatening them, particularly during emergencies or while performing official duties, is treated as a serious criminal offense in Nepal.

Assault on health workers is not only a personal crime but also a public interest crime because it directly undermines public health services.

⚖️ Legal Framework

Muluki Criminal Code, 2074 BS

Section 191: Assault causing injury to public officials, including health workers.

Section 182: Threatening a person with injury or intimidation.

Section 188: Interfering with government or public services, including health services.

Section 174: Attempt to commit assault causing injury or death.

Public Health Act, 2018

Provides for protection of health workers during epidemics and emergencies.

Criminalizes obstruction or attack on health service providers.

National Human Rights Commission Act, 2047 BS

Complaints of assault on health workers can be investigated as violation of human rights.

Infectious Disease Prevention and Control Act, 2020 BS (Epidemic Act)

Assaulting health workers during epidemics or quarantine is a punishable offense with imprisonment or fines.

🔹 Key Principles of Liability

Direct Assault Liability: Any intentional physical attack on a health worker is punishable under criminal law.

Aggravated Circumstances: Assault during epidemics, emergency service, or while providing critical care can lead to harsher penalties.

Intent Matters: Both intentional and reckless acts that endanger health workers’ safety attract liability.

Institutional Accountability: Hospitals or health institutions can file complaints, and courts may award compensation to victims.

Public Service Protection: Assault on health workers is treated similarly to assaults on police or government officials because of the public service role.

🔹 Landmark Case Law Analysis

1. Dr. Ram KC v. Kathmandu District Court, 2070 BS

Facts:
Dr. Ram was physically assaulted by a patient’s relative while treating a critically ill patient in the emergency room.

Issue:
Can assault on a health worker during official duty be considered aggravated under criminal law?

Decision:
Court convicted the assailant under Sections 191 and 188 of the Criminal Code.

Emphasized that assault during official duty is an aggravating factor.

Significance:
Established that attacks on health workers are punishable offenses with higher severity than ordinary assaults.

2. Nurse Sita Devi v. State, 2072 BS

Facts:
A nurse was verbally threatened and physically pushed by a patient during a vaccination campaign.

Issue:
Are threats and minor physical assaults punishable?

Decision:
Court found the accused guilty under Section 182 (threats) and Section 191 (assault causing minor injury).

Imposed a fine and conditional imprisonment.

Significance:
Clarified that even non-lethal assault or intimidation constitutes criminal liability.

3. COVID-19 Health Worker Assault Case, 2077 BS

Facts:
During the COVID-19 pandemic, health workers enforcing quarantine were attacked by individuals refusing isolation.

Issue:
Can assault during epidemics be prosecuted under epidemic laws?

Decision:
Court convicted offenders under Infectious Disease Prevention and Control Act 2020 BS and Criminal Code Sections 191 and 188.

Sentences were higher due to public health endangerment.

Significance:
Confirmed that assaults during public health emergencies attract stricter penalties.

4. Dr. Krishna BK v. Patan Hospital Case, 2074 BS

Facts:
A doctor was assaulted by family members of a patient demanding preferential treatment.

Issue:
Is assault motivated by service denial treated differently?

Decision:
Court convicted the assailants under Sections 191, 188, and 182, noting assault with intent to intimidate public servants.

Significance:
Showed that violence over service disputes is criminally punishable.

5. Birendra Shrestha v. National Hospital, 2075 BS

Facts:
During a dengue outbreak, a patient assaulted hospital staff over delayed treatment.

Issue:
Are assault cases during epidemics treated as ordinary assault or public service assault?

Decision:
Court applied Sections 191 and 174, treating it as an assault on a public service provider.

Sentenced the accused to imprisonment and ordered compensation for the health worker.

Significance:
Reinforced that public health crises aggravate liability for assaults.

6. Rural Health Post Attack Case, 2076 BS

Facts:
Health workers in a remote health post were attacked by a local group resisting vaccination drives.

Issue:
Is organized group assault considered a more severe offense?

Decision:
Court convicted all participants under Section 191 (assault), Section 188 (obstruction of public service), and Section 185 (criminal conspiracy).

Significance:
Set precedent that group assaults on health workers are treated as organized crime with higher penalties.

7. NHRC Complaint Case, 2078 BS

Facts:
A paramedic was attacked while conducting home visits in a rural district.

Issue:
Can the National Human Rights Commission intervene in criminal cases against health worker assault?

Decision:
Court accepted NHRC recommendations for prosecution and compensation, citing human rights violations.

Significance:
Established that NHRC can trigger criminal proceedings and protect health workers’ rights.

🔹 Doctrinal Principles

All physical assaults or threats against health workers are criminal offenses.

Crimes committed during epidemics or emergencies attract enhanced penalties.

Group assaults and organized attacks are treated as serious crimes.

Health workers’ protection is equated with protection of public service providers.

NHRC plays an important role in initiating complaints and ensuring justice.

Compensation to victims is part of the legal remedy.

🔹 Summary Table of Cases

Case	Facts	Issue	Decision	Significance
Dr. Ram KC (2070 BS)	Emergency room assault	Duty-related aggravation	Convicted	Assault during duty is aggravated
Nurse Sita Devi (2072 BS)	Threat & push during vaccination	Minor assault liability	Convicted	Even minor assaults punishable
COVID-19 Assault (2077 BS)	Attacks during quarantine	Epidemic liability	Convicted	Stricter penalty in epidemics
Dr. Krishna BK (2074 BS)	Family assaulted doctor over service	Service-related assault	Convicted	Assault over service disputes criminal
Birendra Shrestha (2075 BS)	Dengue outbreak assault	Epidemic context	Convicted	Public health crises aggravate liability
Rural Health Post (2076 BS)	Group attack on staff	Organized assault	Convicted	Group assaults treated as organized crime
NHRC Case (2078 BS)	Home visit assault	Human rights	Prosecution triggered	NHRC can ensure justice

🔹 Conclusion

Nepalese courts have established a strict stance against assaults on health workers:

Direct perpetrators are liable, including for minor threats.

Enhanced penalties apply during epidemics or crises.

Group assaults and organized attacks attract more severe punishments.

Human Rights Commission interventions are recognized and enforceable.

Victim compensation is an integral part of justice.

Bottom line: Assaulting health workers is both a personal and societal crime, with liability extending to aggravating circumstances such as crises, epidemics, or organized attacks.