Criminal Liability For Copyright Piracy Websites
Criminal Liability for Copyright Piracy Websites
Copyright piracy websites are platforms that host or distribute copyrighted material—such as movies, music, software, or books—without authorization from the copyright holder. Criminal liability arises under various laws depending on the jurisdiction, but generally, they revolve around the unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or communication of copyrighted works.
Key provisions (taking India as an example under the Copyright Act, 1957, and Information Technology Act, 2000):
Section 63: Imposes imprisonment and fines for willful infringement of copyright for commercial purposes.
Section 65: Deals with falsification of copyright records.
Section 66 of IT Act: Addresses hacking or unlawful distribution of digital content.
Section 65A & 65B: Provide for seizure and confiscation of infringing copies.
Criminal liability is triggered when piracy is intentional, commercial, and unauthorized. Mere access or viewing may not attract criminal liability in some jurisdictions unless downloading or distribution occurs.
Case Law Examples
1. R.G. Anand v. Deluxe Films (1978) – India
Facts: Deluxe Films produced a film that was alleged to copy a play written by R.G. Anand.
Issue: Whether copying of substantial portions constitutes infringement.
Held: The court held that if the “substantial part” of the original work is copied, even if not verbatim, it constitutes copyright infringement.
Significance: Established the principle of substantial similarity in Indian copyright law. This principle underpins criminal liability for piracy websites, which often copy substantial portions of movies, music, or software.
2. CBS Songs v. Amarnath (1980) – India
Facts: A company distributed unauthorized copies of musical records.
Issue: Criminal liability for unauthorized copying and distribution.
Held: Court held that deliberate commercial infringement could attract imprisonment and fines under Sections 63 & 63A of the Copyright Act.
Significance: Reinforced that commercial intent makes piracy a criminal offense.
3. Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. Hotfile Corp. (2013) – U.S.
Facts: Hotfile operated a website where users could upload and share copyrighted movies, software, and games. Disney and other studios sued for copyright infringement.
Issue: Liability of website operators for user-uploaded pirated content.
Held: Hotfile was held liable for inducing copyright infringement because it actively encouraged users to upload copyrighted content and profited from it. Hotfile eventually settled for $80 million.
Significance: Even if the website doesn’t directly upload content, inducement and facilitation of piracy attract criminal and civil liability.
4. Universal City Studios v. ReDigi Inc. (2013) – U.S.
Facts: ReDigi allowed users to resell digital music files they legally purchased. Universal claimed this was illegal copying.
Held: Court held that digital reproduction—even for resale—violates copyright because a temporary copy is created during transfer.
Significance: Digital platforms facilitating piracy, even indirectly, are liable if they cause unauthorized reproduction.
5. Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. v. Hotz (2011) – U.S.
Facts: George Hotz (aka GeoHot) bypassed the security of Sony’s PlayStation to allow piracy of games.
Issue: Criminal liability for circumventing technological protection measures.
Held: Settlement included permanent injunctions; courts emphasized violation of Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) anti-circumvention rules.
Significance: Shows that piracy websites exploiting DRM or technical protection measures face criminal as well as civil liability.
6. Paramount Pictures Corporation v. Nauman Hussain (2017) – India
Facts: An individual ran a website offering free downloads of Bollywood and Hollywood movies.
Issue: Criminal prosecution for copyright infringement.
Held: Court sentenced the accused to imprisonment and fines, citing Sections 63 & 65 of the Copyright Act.
Significance: Shows that even individuals running smaller-scale piracy websites can be held criminally liable in India.
7. Motion Picture Association v. Tamilrockers (Ongoing cases in India)
Facts: Tamilrockers is a notorious piracy website leaking Bollywood and Hollywood movies immediately after release.
Legal Action: Courts have ordered blocking of the website in India and seizure of domain names; investigations for criminal conspiracy under IT Act and Copyright Act are ongoing.
Significance: Modern piracy websites attract both civil remedies (blocking) and criminal action under Indian law.
Key Principles from Case Law
Commercial intent is crucial – liability is higher if piracy is for profit.
Facilitation counts – operators don’t have to upload content themselves; inducing piracy is enough.
Digital copies are actionable – temporary reproduction in digital platforms is infringement.
Technical circumvention is punishable – bypassing DRM or encryption adds criminal liability.
Global enforcement is challenging – cross-border websites complicate prosecution but legal frameworks like DMCA and Indian IT Act help.
RELATED Blog
comments