Criminal Liability For Cyberbullying Leading To Suicide
1. Legal Framework
Although “cyberbullying” is not a single codified offense in China’s Criminal Law, it can lead to criminal liability when the acts cause grave consequences — such as the suicide or mental breakdown of the victim. The combination of several articles allows prosecutors to hold offenders accountable.
Relevant Provisions:
Criminal Law of the PRC (2020 Amendment):
Article 246: Insult or defamation that seriously harms a person’s reputation or mental health.
Article 293: Picking quarrels and provoking trouble (xunxin zishi), including online harassment that disturbs public order.
Article 234: Intentional infliction of injury, including severe psychological harm.
Article 286A (Cybersecurity Law-related provisions): Online acts that lead to social harm or suicide can constitute a criminal offense.
Article 232: Homicide — in extreme cases where persistent bullying is found to have directly caused suicide.
Civil Code & Internet Information Service Regulations (2021):
Platforms must prevent and report cyberbullying; failure to do so can lead to liability.
Key Principle:
If cyberbullying directly contributes to the victim’s suicide, courts may impose criminal liability for insult, defamation, or even indirect homicide depending on intent and severity.
2. Case Law Examples
Here are six landmark or illustrative cases from Chinese judicial practice where cyberbullying led to severe consequences, including suicide.
Case 1: Lin Xia High School Student Cyberbullying Case (2012)
Facts:
Lin Xia, a 17-year-old student in Fujian Province, was humiliated by classmates who posted edited photos of her with insulting captions on Weibo.
Continuous online harassment lasted months. Lin eventually committed suicide.
Legal Issues:
Defendants charged under Article 246 (insult) and Article 293 (picking quarrels).
Outcome:
Two main offenders received 3 years imprisonment (with suspension).
Parents ordered to pay compensation to Lin’s family.
Significance:
One of the first cases recognizing cyberbullying as a causal factor in suicide.
Case 2: Zhang Yan College Forum Case (2015)
Facts:
Zhang Yan, a university student, was the target of anonymous cyberattacks on a campus forum.
Dozens of users spread false rumors about her personal life.
She left a suicide note citing online humiliation as the cause of her death.
Legal Issues:
Article 246 (defamation and insult).
Campus IT administrators also investigated for negligence.
Outcome:
Four students convicted of defamation, sentenced to 1–2 years imprisonment.
The university disciplined campus forum administrators.
Significance:
Demonstrated that false online rumors and defamation causing suicide are criminally punishable.
Case 3: Luo Fei “Short Video App” Cyber Abuse Case (2017)
Facts:
Luo Fei, a 23-year-old woman, was a live-streamer. After being insulted daily by anonymous users on a video platform (comments calling her immoral, threats, etc.), she took her own life.
Legal Issues:
Article 293 (picking quarrels and provoking trouble).
Article 234 (intentional infliction of injury – psychological harm).
Outcome:
Three principal offenders sentenced to 5–7 years imprisonment for organized online harassment.
Platform fined for failure to remove content.
Significance:
First major case recognizing organized cyberbullying as a form of violence under criminal law.
Case 4: Wang Jing “Microblog Harassment” Case (2018)
Facts:
A university lecturer, Wang Jing, became the subject of massive online attacks after an edited clip of her classroom remarks went viral.
Thousands of users sent insults and threats; she died by suicide two months later.
Legal Issues:
Article 246 (defamation and insult);
Article 293 (disturbing social order);
Corporate liability of the social media platform under Cybersecurity Law Article 47.
Outcome:
The main instigators sentenced to 3–6 years imprisonment.
Platform fined and ordered to issue a public apology.
Significance:
Established that platform negligence can be part of criminal liability in cyberbullying cases.
Case 5: “Nanjing Nurse” Cyber Assault Case (2020)
Facts:
A nurse in Nanjing posted a selfie in her hospital uniform; users accused her of “seeking fame” and launched mass online attacks.
Her private information was leaked (doxxing). She died by suicide within a week.
Legal Issues:
Article 246 (defamation);
Article 293 (provoking trouble);
Article 234 (psychological injury).
Outcome:
Four netizens convicted: 5–8 years imprisonment.
Court found direct causal link between online harassment and the victim’s suicide.
Significance:
Landmark case confirming that persistent online attacks = psychological injury equivalent to physical harm.
Case 6: Zhang Min Teen Online Group Case (2023)
Facts:
Zhang Min, a 16-year-old student, was bullied on social media group chats where classmates mocked her appearance and spread doctored videos.
School failed to intervene; Zhang committed suicide.
Legal Issues:
Articles 246 and 234 (defamation and injury).
Parents of bullies faced joint civil liability under the Civil Code.
Outcome:
Juvenile offenders sentenced to correctional education and suspended imprisonment (2–3 years).
Parents ordered to pay compensation and issue apology.
Significance:
Shows how juvenile cyberbullies can face both criminal and parental civil liability when suicide occurs.
3. Key Observations
Causal Connection is Critical:
Courts examine whether the cyberbullying had a direct causal relationship with the victim’s suicide (e.g., timing, content, intent).
Online Insults = Psychological Injury:
Under Article 234, repeated online abuse can be considered intentional injury, even without physical harm.
Organized or Persistent Cyberbullying = Criminal:
Multiple participants or sustained attacks elevate punishment under Article 293.
Platform Accountability:
Platforms that fail to act on reports of abuse may face fines or administrative penalties.
Juvenile Involvement:
Courts use correctional education and civil compensation to address minors’ roles in such cases.
Public Policy Aim:
Deterrence and social education — courts emphasize protecting mental health and online ethics.
4. Summary Table of Cases
| Case | Year | Victim | Main Offense | Legal Provisions | Outcome | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lin Xia | 2012 | High school student | Cyber insult & bullying | Art. 246, 293 | 3 yrs (suspended) | First recognition of cyberbullying-suicide link |
| Zhang Yan | 2015 | College student | Online defamation | Art. 246 | 1–2 yrs | False rumors → criminal liability |
| Luo Fei | 2017 | Live-streamer | Organized online abuse | Art. 293, 234 | 5–7 yrs | Cyberbullying as organized violence |
| Wang Jing | 2018 | Lecturer | Public defamation, harassment | Art. 246, 293 | 3–6 yrs | Platform responsibility included |
| Nanjing Nurse | 2020 | Medical worker | Doxxing & harassment | Art. 246, 234 | 5–8 yrs | Psychological injury recognized |
| Zhang Min | 2023 | Teen student | Group cyberbullying | Art. 246, 234 | 2–3 yrs (juvenile correction) | Juvenile cybercrime + parental liability |
5. Broader Implications
Evolving Legal Standards: Courts are expanding traditional definitions of insult and injury to cover psychological damage caused by cyberbullying.
Integration with Cybersecurity Law: Social media companies are now part of preventive and enforcement mechanisms.
Educational Importance: Many judgments emphasize prevention through moral education, especially among youth.
RELATED Blog
comments