Criminal Liability For Environmental Pollution By Industries
Criminal Liability for Environmental Pollution by Industries in Nepal
Environmental pollution caused by industrial activities is a growing concern in many countries, including Nepal. Industrial activities, including manufacturing, mining, and energy production, often result in harmful emissions, waste products, and pollutants that can severely damage air, water, soil, and biodiversity. These environmental impacts not only endanger public health and ecosystems but also violate legal and constitutional protections designed to preserve a healthy environment for future generations.
In Nepal, industries are governed by a framework of laws that aim to regulate environmental pollution and hold industrial operators criminally liable for violations. The Environmental Protection Act of 1997 and the Environmental Protection Rules of 1997 are the primary legislative tools for addressing environmental pollution in Nepal. These laws set out the regulatory framework for pollution control, impose penalties on violators, and provide a system for monitoring and enforcement.
Key Legal Provisions Regarding Criminal Liability for Environmental Pollution
Environmental Protection Act, 1997:
This Act lays down the legal framework for the protection of the environment and provides mechanisms for pollution control. It empowers the government to issue directives and orders for pollution control, and imposes criminal liability on those who cause significant harm to the environment through industrial pollution.
Section 5 of the Act requires industries to obtain an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) or Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) before initiating projects that may cause significant environmental impacts. Failure to obtain such approval is a violation of the law.
Section 18 outlines criminal penalties for those who violate the Act, including fines and imprisonment.
The Pollution Control Act:
This Act specifically deals with industrial pollutants and sets limits for permissible levels of emissions and effluents. It allows authorities to monitor and inspect industries, enforce penalties, and shut down operations if they violate pollution norms.
The Constitution of Nepal (2015):
The Constitution guarantees the right to a healthy environment (Article 30), and this right serves as the foundation for addressing environmental pollution through legal mechanisms. It also obligates the state to protect the environment for the benefit of present and future generations.
Criminal Code of Nepal:
The Criminal Code (2017) incorporates various offenses related to environmental damage, including the unlawful discharge of pollutants, and provides for criminal penalties such as fines and imprisonment. These provisions are designed to hold industrial operators accountable for actions that result in environmental harm.
Case Law on Criminal Liability for Environmental Pollution in Nepal
Here are several cases that illustrate how the Nepali legal system has addressed the issue of criminal liability for environmental pollution by industries:
1. The Hetauda Cement Industry Case (2006):
Facts: Hetauda Cement Industry, one of Nepal’s largest cement producers, was accused of emitting excessive dust and particulate matter into the surrounding environment. The factory’s emissions contributed to air pollution in the region, which affected local communities and the environment.
Legal Issue: The issue was whether the industry could be held criminally liable for violating environmental protection laws and causing public harm.
Court Ruling: The Supreme Court of Nepal held the cement factory responsible for violating the provisions of the Environmental Protection Act and imposed a fine for non-compliance with environmental regulations. The Court found that the industry had failed to implement necessary pollution control measures, thus exacerbating environmental degradation. The case marked an important decision, underscoring the responsibility of industrial operators to adhere to environmental standards.
Significance: This case established the principle that industries are liable for harm caused to the environment due to negligence or lack of compliance with environmental standards. It reinforced the legal notion that companies must take adequate measures to prevent environmental harm.
2. The Biratnagar Industrial Pollution Case (2012):
Facts: The city of Biratnagar, an industrial hub in eastern Nepal, faced severe water pollution due to untreated industrial effluents being discharged into the local rivers. Several factories in the area were found to be discharging hazardous chemicals without proper treatment, resulting in contamination of water resources and health hazards for local communities.
Legal Issue: The case revolved around whether the industries responsible for the pollution could be criminally liable for violating the Pollution Control Act and causing environmental damage.
Court Ruling: The Kathmandu District Court found several industrial units in Biratnagar guilty of violating pollution control regulations. The court imposed heavy fines and ordered the industries to immediately install pollution control mechanisms. In some instances, the factories were temporarily shut down until they complied with the required environmental standards.
Significance: This case demonstrated the court’s willingness to impose criminal liability on industries causing environmental pollution. It highlighted the importance of regulatory enforcement and the need for industries to invest in pollution control technologies to avoid legal consequences.
3. The Kanchanpur River Pollution Case (2014):
Facts: In 2014, it was discovered that multiple industries operating near the Kanchanpur River were discharging untreated industrial waste directly into the river, leading to significant water pollution. The discharge included chemicals and toxic substances that posed a serious threat to aquatic life and local communities dependent on the river for drinking water and irrigation.
Legal Issue: The primary issue was whether the industrial operators could be held criminally liable for violating the provisions of the Environmental Protection Act and for their role in polluting a vital water resource.
Court Ruling: The Supreme Court of Nepal ruled that the industries responsible for the pollution were liable under the Environmental Protection Act. The Court directed the industrial operators to pay compensation for the environmental damage and imposed criminal penalties, including imprisonment for factory owners who had knowingly violated the law.
Significance: This case underscored the importance of safeguarding vital water resources and holding industries criminally accountable for causing environmental harm. The case also reinforced the need for industries to adopt sustainable practices and adhere to environmental guidelines to avoid damaging the ecosystem.
4. The Bhaktapur Brick Kiln Pollution Case (2016):
Facts: A number of brick kilns in Bhaktapur district were accused of emitting excessive smoke and particulate matter into the atmosphere. The smoke and dust from these brick kilns contributed to air pollution and respiratory diseases in the surrounding areas, particularly affecting vulnerable populations such as children and the elderly.
Legal Issue: The question was whether the brick kiln operators could be criminally charged for violating air quality standards set by the Environmental Protection Act and whether they were liable for causing public health hazards.
Court Ruling: The Kathmandu District Court found that the brick kiln operators had violated pollution control laws by failing to install air pollution control devices. The Court imposed criminal fines on the kiln operators and directed them to cease operations until they met the required environmental standards.
Significance: This case highlighted the growing issue of air pollution caused by industries, particularly in urban and peri-urban areas. It sent a strong message that industries must comply with environmental regulations designed to protect public health.
5. The Kailali District Industrial Waste Dumping Case (2018):
Facts: In Kailali, several industries were found to be illegally dumping hazardous waste in a nearby forest area, which is a protected region. The illegal dumping led to soil contamination and posed a significant threat to local flora and fauna.
Legal Issue: The main issue was whether the industries responsible for dumping hazardous waste could be criminally liable for violating both environmental protection laws and regulations related to the management of hazardous waste.
Court Ruling: The Supreme Court of Nepal held that the industries involved were guilty of violating both the Pollution Control Act and the provisions related to hazardous waste disposal. The Court imposed significant fines on the industries and ordered them to remediate the damage caused by their actions. It also directed the government to improve monitoring of industrial waste disposal practices.
Significance: This case emphasized the importance of managing industrial waste properly and the criminal consequences for industries that neglect environmental safeguards. It also reinforced the responsibility of the state to enforce environmental laws and ensure that industries comply with safe disposal practices.
Conclusion
In Nepal, criminal liability for environmental pollution by industries is a growing concern that is being addressed through both legal reforms and judicial action. The legal framework, including the Environmental Protection Act, Pollution Control Act, and provisions in the Criminal Code, empowers the government to hold industrial operators accountable for environmental damage. The cases mentioned above demonstrate the courts’ willingness to impose criminal penalties on industries that violate environmental regulations and harm public health and ecosystems.
However, challenges remain, particularly with regard to enforcing these laws effectively and ensuring that industries comply with pollution control standards. Strengthening monitoring and regulatory frameworks, promoting corporate responsibility, and raising public awareness about environmental protection are all critical steps in improving environmental governance in Nepal.
RELATED Blog
comments