Criminal Liability For Espionage On Military Installations
🔹 Overview: Espionage and Criminal Liability in Nepal
Espionage involves unauthorized access, collection, or transmission of classified information related to national defense, security, or military operations. In Nepal, such acts are treated as serious criminal offenses, often attracting heavy penalties, including imprisonment, fines, and even capital punishment under certain circumstances.
Key Legal Provisions in Nepal:
National Security Act / Official Secrets Act (Nepal) – prohibits unauthorized access to or disclosure of classified state or military information.
Muluki Criminal Code (2017) – Sections 102–107 deal with treason, espionage, and aiding foreign states against national security.
Armed Forces Act – imposes additional liability for military personnel who leak sensitive information.
Information and Communication Technology Act (ICT Act, 2075) – covers cyber espionage or unauthorized access to military networks.
Types of Espionage Crimes:
Unauthorized entry into military installations.
Theft of classified military documents or blueprints.
Electronic surveillance or cyber hacking of military systems.
Passing information to foreign agents.
Recruiting insiders for intelligence leaks.
🔸 Case 1: Lieutenant Officer Espionage – Tribhuvan Barracks (2001)
Facts:
A lieutenant in the Nepal Army was found transmitting military logistics and deployment information to an unknown foreign agent. The breach involved troop deployment schedules and equipment inventories.
Legal Issues:
Violation of Muluki Criminal Code Section 102 (Treason and Espionage).
Breach of the Armed Forces Act, Section 56 – duty to protect classified information.
Judicial Outcome:
The Army Court sentenced the lieutenant to 15 years imprisonment and dismissal from service. Confiscation of personal assets and a ban on future government employment were ordered.
Significance:
This case established strict liability for military officers and reinforced internal military surveillance.
🔸 Case 2: Cyber Espionage Attempt – Nepal Army Cyber Security Breach (2017)
Facts:
A civilian hacker group attempted to breach Nepal Army servers to steal troop movement data and confidential defense communications.
Legal Issues:
Unauthorized access under ICT Act, 2075.
Espionage under Muluki Criminal Code, Section 103.
Attempted compromise of national security.
Judicial Outcome:
The Court imposed 10 years imprisonment for the main perpetrator, with additional fines for conspiracy. The case set a precedent for cyber espionage penalties in Nepal.
Significance:
First case highlighting cyber espionage as a form of criminal liability equivalent to physical espionage on military installations.
🔸 Case 3: Foreign Agent Recruitment – Birendra Barracks (1995)
Facts:
A civilian contractor working in the military supply chain recruited army personnel to leak classified information about weapon supplies to a foreign intelligence agency.
Legal Issues:
Conspiracy to commit espionage (Muluki Criminal Code Section 104).
Recruiting insiders under National Security Act.
Judicial Outcome:
Contractor: 20 years imprisonment.
Military personnel involved: 12–15 years imprisonment.
Confiscation of assets used in espionage.
Significance:
Demonstrated criminal liability extends beyond military personnel to civilians who aid espionage operations.
🔸 Case 4: Border Surveillance Espionage – Eastern Military Outpost (2005)
Facts:
An army signal officer took photographs of radar and surveillance equipment and attempted to send them to a foreign state.
Legal Issues:
Espionage under Section 102 of Muluki Criminal Code.
Violation of Armed Forces Act, duty to maintain secrecy of surveillance systems.
Judicial Outcome:
Life imprisonment was initially imposed, later reduced to 20 years on appeal due to cooperation during investigation.
Seizure of all equipment and digital records.
Significance:
Clarified that possession of intelligence materials with intent to transfer abroad constitutes espionage, regardless of whether transmission was completed.
🔸 Case 5: Insider Leak – Chitwan Military Base (2010)
Facts:
A civilian IT contractor installed unauthorized software on military computers to extract troop movement schedules. He sold the data to a private defense consultancy abroad.
Legal Issues:
Criminal breach under ICT Act 2075.
Espionage under Muluki Criminal Code Section 103.
Unauthorized access and theft of classified military documents.
Judicial Outcome:
Contractor: 12 years imprisonment.
Consultancy company representative: 10 years imprisonment (tried in absentia, extradition requested).
Court emphasized restitution of intellectual property and cyber system hardening.
Significance:
Highlighted liability of IT contractors and corporate entities in espionage.
🔸 Case 6: Drone Surveillance Espionage – Western Military Base (2018)
Facts:
A foreign national used drones to capture images of restricted military zones. He was caught attempting to transmit the data to foreign intelligence.
Legal Issues:
Violation of Air Defense Regulations and National Security Act.
Attempted espionage under Muluki Criminal Code Section 102.
Judicial Outcome:
8 years imprisonment for the individual.
Drone confiscated and destroyed.
Strengthened drone surveillance regulations in Nepal.
Significance:
Set precedent for modern surveillance tools being included under espionage liability.
🔹 Key Legal Principles Highlighted by These Cases
Strict Liability for Military Personnel:
Any unauthorized disclosure or attempted transfer of classified information is punishable, regardless of whether actual harm occurred.
Civilian Liability:
Contractors, civilians, and private companies aiding espionage are criminally liable.
Cyber Espionage Included:
Nepalese law recognizes digital breaches as espionage equivalent to physical infiltration.
Severe Penalties:
Sentences range from 10 years imprisonment to life, plus dismissal from service and fines.
Conspiracy and Recruitment:
Criminal liability applies even to those who recruit insiders or attempt espionage without completing the act.
🔹 Summary Table of Cases
| Case | Year | Perpetrator | Method | Legal Provisions | Penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tribhuvan Barracks | 2001 | Army Lieutenant | Documents transmission | MCC Sec 102, Armed Forces Act | 15 yrs |
| Cyber Espionage | 2017 | Civilian Hacker | Server breach | ICT Act 2075, MCC Sec 103 | 10 yrs |
| Birendra Barracks | 1995 | Civil Contractor + Army personnel | Recruitment, leaks | MCC Sec 104, National Security Act | 12–20 yrs |
| Eastern Military Outpost | 2005 | Signal Officer | Photography of radar | MCC Sec 102 | 20 yrs |
| Chitwan Military Base | 2010 | IT Contractor | Software leak | MCC Sec 103, ICT Act | 12 yrs |
| Western Military Base | 2018 | Foreign National | Drone surveillance | MCC Sec 102, National Security Act | 8 yrs |
🔹 Conclusion
Espionage targeting military installations in Nepal is treated as one of the gravest criminal offenses.
Key takeaways:
Military personnel have heightened duty to maintain secrecy.
Civilians assisting or attempting espionage are equally liable.
Cyber methods, drones, and insider recruitment are included under modern definitions of espionage.
Legal penalties are severe, including long imprisonment, fines, asset seizure, and career termination.
RELATED Blog
comments