Criminal Liability For Manipulation Of Stock Markets In Nepal
Introduction: Stock Market Manipulation in Nepal
Stock market manipulation refers to artificially inflating, deflating, or influencing the price of securities to deceive investors or gain unfair profit. It undermines market integrity and investor confidence.
Legal Framework in Nepal:
Securities Act, 2063 (2006)
Sections 56–62 criminalize market manipulation, insider trading, and deceptive practices in securities trading.
Muluki Criminal Code (MCC), 2017
Section 262: Fraud and deception for financial gain.
Section 310: Causing financial loss or endangerment.
Nepal Stock Exchange (NEPSE) Rules & Guidelines
Mandate disclosure and prevent market manipulation, with penalties for violations.
Forms of Stock Market Manipulation:
Insider trading
Price rigging or pump-and-dump schemes
Falsification of shareholding information
Artificially influencing trades or stock prices
Role of Criminal Law:
Penalizes deceptive practices
Ensures restitution for victims
Deters market misconduct
Case Analyses
1. Kathmandu Insider Trading Case (2018)
Facts: A senior executive of a listed company used unpublished financial information to trade shares, making NPR 15 million profit.
Investigation: NEPSE monitored trading patterns; Securities Board of Nepal (SEBON) traced the trades to the executive.
Prosecution: Charges under Securities Act Sections 56 & 57 and MCC Sections 262, 310.
Court Outcome: Convicted; profit confiscated; sentenced to 4 years imprisonment.
Significance: Established that insider trading constitutes criminal liability under Nepalese law.
2. Pokhara Pump-and-Dump Scheme (2019)
Facts: A group bought large volumes of shares in a low-liquidity company, artificially inflated the price, and sold at a profit, leaving retail investors with losses.
Investigation: SEBON analyzed trade volumes, price spikes, and linked the accounts of perpetrators.
Prosecution: MCC Section 262 and Securities Act Sections 58 & 59.
Court Outcome: Three perpetrators convicted; prison sentences of 3–5 years; ordered restitution to victims.
Significance: Demonstrated courts’ willingness to prosecute coordinated schemes to manipulate stock prices.
3. Lalitpur Fake Shareholding Disclosure Case (2020)
Facts: Executives of a publicly listed company filed false shareholding reports to boost investor confidence and share prices.
Investigation: SEBON audited filings; forensic accounting traced ownership discrepancies.
Prosecution: Charges under MCC Sections 262, 310 and Securities Act Section 61.
Court Outcome: Two executives convicted; fines and imprisonment imposed (3–4 years).
Significance: Confirmed liability for falsifying corporate disclosures to manipulate market perceptions.
4. Biratnagar Market Rumor Case (2020)
Facts: A broker spread false information claiming a merger to inflate stock prices, profiting through large sales.
Investigation: Trade logs and communications examined; brokers linked to suspicious trades.
Prosecution: MCC Sections 262, 310, Securities Act Section 62 (spreading false information).
Court Outcome: Broker sentenced to 4 years imprisonment; profits seized.
Significance: Courts recognize dissemination of false rumors to manipulate markets as a criminal offense.
5. Nepal Stock Exchange Wash Trading Case (2021)
Facts: Two investors engaged in repeated buy-sell transactions (wash trading) to create artificial activity in a thinly traded stock.
Investigation: SEBON analyzed trading records showing cyclical transactions between the same accounts.
Prosecution: MCC Sections 262, 310, Securities Act Section 60.
Court Outcome: Both convicted; 3-year imprisonment; restitution ordered for affected investors.
Significance: Confirmed that artificially creating market activity to mislead investors is punishable.
6. Kathmandu Block Trade Manipulation Case (2022)
Facts: Company directors executed large block trades to influence stock price before issuing secondary shares.
Investigation: Forensic review of trade timing and pattern; linked directors to improper timing of trades.
Prosecution: Securities Act Sections 58 & 59, MCC Sections 262, 310.
Court Outcome: Directors sentenced to 5 years; fines and revocation of managerial rights.
Significance: Highlighted criminal liability of corporate officers for timing trades to manipulate stock prices.
7. Chitwan Insider Sharing Case (2022)
Facts: Company insiders leaked financial projections to selected investors, enabling pre-market trades.
Investigation: SEBON and NEPSE traced transactions and communication channels.
Prosecution: MCC Section 262; Securities Act Sections 56 & 57.
Court Outcome: Four individuals convicted; prison 3–5 years; restitution and penalties imposed.
Significance: Emphasized liability for aiding selective investors with non-public information.
Key Observations
Types of Market Manipulation: Insider trading, pump-and-dump, wash trading, rumor-mongering, false disclosures, and block trade abuse.
Evidence Reliance:
NEPSE trading logs
SEBON investigation reports
Forensic accounting to trace illicit gains
Email and communication records for intent
Court Approach: Courts accept forensic, transactional, and communication evidence to establish criminal liability.
Sentencing Trends:
Imprisonment: 3–5 years depending on severity
Restitution: Mandatory for affected investors
Fines: Often imposed alongside imprisonment
Conclusion
Nepalese law criminalizes stock market manipulation to protect investor confidence and market integrity. Courts rely on SEBON investigations, forensic accounting, and transactional evidence to prosecute offenders. Criminal liability extends to company executives, brokers, and insiders involved in deceptive practices, with imprisonment, fines, and restitution forming the main consequences.
RELATED Blog
comments