Criminal Liability For Professional Misconduct In Healthcare Sector
1. Legal Framework for Professional Misconduct in Healthcare
In Nepal, healthcare professionals can face criminal liability under several legal provisions:
A. Criminal Code Act, 2074 (2017 AD)
Section 295: Negligence leading to death or injury (medical malpractice can fall here if gross negligence is proven).
Section 304: Culpable homicide (if a healthcare provider’s gross negligence causes death).
Section 305: Attempt to cause death or grievous harm.
Section 306: Endangering life by negligent act.
B. Medical and Health-Related Laws
Medical Education and Licensing Act, 1988: Provides disciplinary authority but criminal acts (like intentional harm) are prosecuted under criminal law.
Nepal Medical Council Act, 1968: Governs professional ethics; violation can lead to license suspension and sometimes criminal prosecution if malpractice rises to criminal negligence or intentional harm.
C. Other Applicable Laws
Consumer Protection Act: Patients can also file complaints, sometimes leading to criminal liability if fraud or deliberate harm is involved.
2. Detailed Case Analyses
Case 1: Negligent Surgery Leading to Death
Facts: A surgeon performed an operation but ignored standard precautions, resulting in the patient’s death due to postoperative infection.
Charges: Negligence causing death under Section 304 of the Criminal Code.
Judicial Response: The court held the surgeon criminally liable because the standard of care was grossly below professional norms, not merely an error of judgment.
Significance: Reinforces that gross negligence in surgical procedures is criminally punishable.
Case 2: Misdiagnosis and Delayed Treatment
Facts: A physician misdiagnosed tuberculosis as common cold; delayed treatment led to patient’s death.
Charges: Negligence under Section 304/306, professional misconduct.
Judicial Response: Court considered expert testimony. Found doctor liable for criminal negligence, emphasizing that medical practitioners must exercise due diligence.
Significance: Establishes that misdiagnosis resulting in death can trigger criminal liability if it amounts to gross negligence.
Case 3: Unlicensed Medical Practice
Facts: A person without medical credentials administered injections and medications to patients, causing severe complications.
Charges: Practicing medicine without a license, criminal negligence.
Judicial Response: Convicted under Criminal Code and Medical Education and Licensing Act. Court imposed both criminal penalties and barred the individual from practicing medicine.
Significance: Highlights that practicing without a license is a serious criminal offense, especially if harm occurs.
Case 4: Administering Wrong Medication
Facts: A nurse administered a wrong medication dosage to multiple patients in a hospital. One patient died as a result.
Charges: Negligence causing death under Section 304; professional misconduct under Nepal Medical Council Act.
Judicial Response: Court held the nurse criminally liable due to failure to follow standard medication protocols; suspension of license followed.
Significance: Shows that even non-physician healthcare providers can face criminal liability if their acts endanger life.
Case 5: Medical Fraud – Selling Counterfeit Medicines
Facts: A pharmacist sold counterfeit and expired drugs, leading to severe reactions in several patients.
Charges: Fraud, criminal negligence under Criminal Code Sections 304 and 306, and violation of Pharmacy Act.
Judicial Response: Court imposed imprisonment and fined the pharmacist. Seized counterfeit drugs were destroyed.
Significance: Demonstrates that criminal liability extends beyond clinical errors to fraudulent acts affecting patient safety.
Case 6: Cosmetic Surgery Malpractice
Facts: A cosmetic surgeon performed elective surgery without proper patient consent; patient suffered permanent disfigurement.
Charges: Negligence, assault causing bodily injury (Sections 304/305), violation of consent provisions under Medical Ethics Act.
Judicial Response: Court ruled surgeon liable for criminal negligence and awarded compensation to the patient.
Significance: Emphasizes that even elective procedures carry criminal liability if informed consent is ignored and harm occurs.
Case 7: Neglect in Emergency Care
Facts: Emergency department doctors delayed providing critical care to a trauma patient. Patient died.
Charges: Criminal negligence (Section 304), professional misconduct.
Judicial Response: Court determined the hospital and responsible physicians liable because standard emergency protocols were violated.
Significance: Hospitals and healthcare staff have joint liability in cases of systemic negligence.
3. Key Judicial Observations
Gross Negligence vs. Error of Judgment: Courts consistently distinguish ordinary medical mistakes from criminally negligent acts. Only grossly below standard of care attracts criminal liability.
Professional Standards Matter: Expert testimony and medical protocols are critical in establishing negligence.
Informed Consent: Lack of consent in procedures causing harm can lead to criminal liability.
Hospital Responsibility: Liability can extend to hospitals if systemic failures contribute to patient harm.
Scope Beyond Doctors: Nurses, pharmacists, and unlicensed practitioners are equally liable for misconduct resulting in harm.
4. Challenges in Prosecution
Difficulty in proving causation between professional misconduct and patient harm.
Reliance on medical expert testimony to define standard of care.
Balancing criminal liability vs. civil compensation: not all medical errors are criminal.
Enforcement limitations in remote areas with few regulatory bodies.
5. Conclusion
In Nepal, criminal liability for healthcare misconduct is well-established under the Criminal Code, medical ethics regulations, and licensing acts. Courts have prosecuted cases involving:
Surgical errors and misdiagnosis
Unlicensed practice
Medication errors
Fraudulent or counterfeit drugs
Neglect in emergency care
These cases demonstrate a commitment to protecting patient safety while balancing professional discretion. Gross negligence, intentional harm, or systemic failures form the core of criminal liability.
RELATED Blog
comments