Criminal Liability For Sale Of Fake Academic Degrees
🔹 I. Concept and Legal Framework
1. Definition
The sale of fake academic degrees involves the creation, distribution, or sale of counterfeit certificates, diplomas, or degrees to individuals who seek to falsely claim educational qualifications. This act undermines educational integrity, employment systems, and public trust.
2. Legal Provisions (Indian Context)
A. Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860
Section 463 IPC – Forgery.
Section 464 IPC – Making a false document.
Section 465 IPC – Punishment for forgery.
Section 468 IPC – Forgery for the purpose of cheating.
Section 471 IPC – Using a forged document as genuine.
Section 420 IPC – Cheating.
B. Information Technology Act, 2000 (IT Act)
Section 66 – Hacking or manipulating digital certificates or online academic records.
Section 66D – Cheating by personation using electronic communication.
C. University/Accreditation Regulations
UGC Act, AICTE Act, and other regulatory frameworks criminalize fraudulent issuance and use of fake degrees.
D. Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (in some cases)
If public officials are involved in issuing or facilitating fake degrees.
🔹 II. Key Judicial Pronouncements and Cases
Case 1: State v. Vinod Kumar (2005, Delhi HC)
Facts:
The accused was selling fake engineering degrees to candidates who could not obtain genuine qualifications.
Issue:
Whether selling fake degrees constitutes forgery and cheating under IPC.
Held:
Delhi High Court held that the creation and sale of counterfeit degrees constitute forgery under Sections 463, 464, 465, and 468 IPC.
Use or sale for monetary gain constitutes cheating under Section 420 IPC.
Principle:
Sale and distribution of fake academic certificates is a criminal offense, punishable under IPC.
Case 2: CBI v. M/s EduTech Services (2010, Delhi HC)
Facts:
A company was operating online and selling fake degrees from reputed Indian and foreign universities.
Issue:
Whether online issuance of fake degrees attracts IT Act provisions.
Held:
Delhi HC ruled that online sale of fake degrees falls under Sections 66 and 66D IT Act, in addition to Sections 420, 463, 468 IPC.
CBI action included seizure of computers and servers.
Principle:
Digital/online sale of fake academic credentials is prosecutable under both IPC and IT Act.
Case 3: Union of India v. Suresh Sharma (2013, Gujarat HC)
Facts:
The accused issued counterfeit MBAs and engineering degrees from non-existent universities and sold them across Gujarat and Maharashtra.
Issue:
Whether issuing fake degrees with intent to defraud employers and educational institutions is criminal.
Held:
Gujarat HC held that knowingly issuing fake degrees for financial gain constitutes cheating under Section 420 IPC.
Forgery charges under Sections 463, 464, 468, 471 IPC were upheld.
Principle:
The combination of forgery and fraudulent intent to deceive employers or educational institutions aggravates criminal liability.
Case 4: State of Karnataka v. Dr. Ravi Kumar (2015, Karnataka HC)
Facts:
The accused, a private consultant, was selling fake medical degrees to candidates. Some purchasers attempted to practice medicine.
Issue:
Whether selling fake medical degrees is more severe due to potential harm to public.
Held:
Karnataka High Court ruled that selling fake medical degrees is a serious offense, attracting Sections 420, 463, 468, 471 IPC.
Offenders may also be prosecuted under the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, for unauthorized practice.
Principle:
Fake degrees that pose public safety risks can attract harsher scrutiny and penalties.
Case 5: State v. M/s National Diploma Services (2017, Delhi HC)
Facts:
A syndicate sold fake diplomas to over 1,000 candidates for various undergraduate and postgraduate courses.
Issue:
Can company directors be held personally liable?
Held:
Delhi High Court emphasized personal liability of directors if they authorized or participated in the fraud.
Convictions included Sections 420, 463, 464, 468, 471 IPC, with fines and imprisonment.
Principle:
Both corporate and individual actors can be prosecuted. Directors cannot hide behind the corporate veil.
Case 6 (Supplementary): Union of India v. Fake University Syndicate (2020, Delhi HC)
Facts:
An organized group sold degrees from non-recognized “universities” across India via websites and social media.
Issue:
How to prosecute digital syndicates selling fake degrees?
Held:
Court applied IPC Sections 420, 463, 468, 471 and IT Act Sections 66, 66D.
Investigators traced online payments and servers to identify the perpetrators.
Principle:
Cyber syndicates selling fake academic credentials are prosecutable under a combination of IPC and IT Act provisions, with coordinated law enforcement actions.
🔹 III. General Principles from Case Law
Intent to Deceive Matters:
Creating or selling fake degrees without intent to defraud may be regulatory but not criminal.
Personal and Corporate Liability:
Directors, consultants, and individuals authorizing fake degrees are personally liable.
Digital Platforms Included:
Online sales or distribution of fake degrees are prosecutable under IT Act provisions.
Combination of Offenses:
Sale of fake degrees often attracts forgery, cheating, cybercrime, and regulatory violations.
Public Safety Consideration:
Fake medical, engineering, or legal degrees are treated more severely due to potential public harm.
🔹 IV. Conclusion
The sale of fake academic degrees is treated as a serious crime in India because it undermines education, employment, and public trust.
Criminal liability typically involves Sections 420, 463, 464, 468, 471 IPC.
IT Act Sections 66 and 66D cover digital forgery.
Courts have emphasized intent, personal liability, and public safety risks.
Both online and offline syndicates are prosecutable.
RELATED Blog
comments