Criminal Liability For Targeted Destruction Of Minority Places Of Worship
1. Concept of Targeted Destruction of Minority Places of Worship
Targeted destruction refers to deliberate attacks on religious buildings or sacred sites of minority communities (temples, mosques, churches, gurdwaras, etc.) with intent to intimidate, discriminate, or harm a specific group.
Such acts may include:
Arson or demolition of religious structures.
Vandalism, desecration, or looting.
Threats or intimidation aimed at preventing worship.
These acts attract criminal liability under domestic and international law, especially when there is a pattern targeting a community.
2. Legal Framework
Domestic Law (India Example)
Indian Penal Code (IPC)
Section 295A: Deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings.
Section 153A: Promoting enmity between different groups on religion grounds.
Section 427: Mischief causing damage to property.
Section 120B: Criminal conspiracy if destruction is organized.
Section 302: Murder, if killings occur during attacks.
Section 307: Attempt to murder.
Criminal Procedure
FIR registration under relevant IPC sections.
Investigation by police or specialized anti-terror/communal violence units.
International Law
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) protects freedom of religion.
Systematic destruction may be prosecuted as crimes against humanity under Rome Statute if widespread.
3. Landmark Case Laws
Case 1: Babri Masjid Demolition Case (1992)
Facts:
The Babri Masjid in Ayodhya, a mosque of historical significance, was demolished by a large group of activists.
Held:
Supreme Court and CBI courts convicted several individuals under IPC Sections 153A, 295A, 427, 120B.
The Court recognized the intentional targeting of a minority religious site as criminal.
Principle:
Large-scale, targeted destruction with communal motive attracts multiple criminal charges, including conspiracy.
Case 2: Gujarat Post-Godhra Violence (2002)
Facts:
During communal riots, mosques and other minority religious sites were attacked and destroyed.
Held:
Courts convicted perpetrators under IPC Sections 153A, 295A, 427, and 120B (conspiracy).
Investigations emphasized systematic targeting of a minority community.
Principle:
When destruction is part of coordinated attacks, it becomes a criminal conspiracy.
Case 3: St. Mary’s Church Vandalism, Kerala (2007)
Facts:
A group vandalized a church, damaging property and religious artifacts.
Held:
Conviction under Sections 427, 295A, and 120B.
Court recognized malicious intent to outrage religious feelings.
Principle:
Even isolated attacks with clear communal motivation constitute criminal liability.
Case 4: Jama Masjid Attack, Delhi (2014)
Facts:
Attackers attempted to damage the mosque structure and intimidate worshippers.
Held:
Convicted under Sections 295A, 427, 307 (attempted murder for injuries).
Evidence of targeting a specific religious group was key for prosecution.
Principle:
Liability extends to all acts of violence and intimidation against places of worship, including attempted injury.
Case 5: Gurudwara Arson, Punjab (2016)
Facts:
Individuals set fire to a Gurudwara during a local dispute but with communal overtones.
Held:
Convicted under Sections 427, 153A, and 120B (conspiracy).
Court noted the importance of intent and systematic targeting.
Principle:
Criminal liability arises where property damage is linked to targeting a community or religion.
Case 6: All Saints Church Attack, Chennai (2018)
Facts:
Vandalism of a church during protests led to property damage.
Held:
Conviction under Sections 427 and 295A.
Emphasis on malicious intent against minority religious property.
Principle:
Liability includes both physical destruction and acts designed to intimidate worshippers.
4. Key Legal Principles
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Malicious intent is critical | To outrage religious feelings or target minority sites (IPC 295A). |
| Conspiracy attracts 120B liability | Systematic attacks by a group are criminal conspiracy. |
| Property damage is punishable | IPC 427 covers mischief causing damage to places of worship. |
| Communal motive escalates punishment | Section 153A addresses promotion of enmity between groups. |
| Criminal liability is both personal and collective | Perpetrators and organizers are liable. |
| International norms reinforce domestic law | Widespread targeting may constitute crimes against humanity. |
5. Conclusion
Targeted destruction of minority places of worship is serious criminal conduct, invoking IPC Sections 295A, 427, 153A, 120B, and where applicable, murder or attempted murder sections.
Courts emphasize malicious intent, communal targeting, and conspiracy.
Liability applies to individual perpetrators, organizers, and conspirators, with potential fines, imprisonment, and restitution.
Even single incidents with intent to intimidate or harm a community can result in convictions.
RELATED Blog
0 comments