Criminal Liability For Transnational Wildlife Trafficking
Transnational wildlife trafficking refers to the illegal trade of animals, plants, or wildlife products that crosses international borders. This practice threatens global biodiversity, contributes to species extinction, and fuels organized crime. The penalties for wildlife trafficking are severe, as it undermines national and international conservation efforts. Criminal liability for individuals and corporations involved in wildlife trafficking is governed by a mix of domestic laws, international conventions, and regional agreements.
1. Legal Framework for Transnational Wildlife Trafficking
International Law
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES): Established in 1973, CITES is an international agreement aimed at ensuring that international trade in wild animals and plants does not threaten their survival.
United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime (UNTOC): Specifically, the Wildlife and Forest Crime framework under UNTOC criminalizes transnational trafficking.
Wildlife Crime Initiative (INTERPOL): Works to combat transnational wildlife trafficking, especially through cross-border cooperation.
Domestic Laws
United States: The Endangered Species Act (ESA) and the Lacey Act provide for the criminal prosecution of those involved in trafficking protected species.
India: The Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 criminalizes the poaching, trade, and export of wildlife and wildlife products.
South Africa: The National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (NEMBA) addresses illegal wildlife trade.
European Union: The EU Wildlife Trade Regulations implement CITES in EU countries, criminalizing the trade of protected species.
2. Case Law Examples (Detailed)
Case 1: The Ivory Trafficking Network (USA, 2014)
Jurisdiction: United States, Transnational (Africa, Asia)
Background
A major international trafficking ring was uncovered involving the smuggling of ivory from elephants poached in Africa and transported through Asia to the United States. The traffickers used front companies and false documentation to disguise the ivory shipments as legal goods.
Criminal Liability Analysis
Smuggling and Trade in Endangered Species: The defendants violated the Lacey Act, which prohibits the trafficking of wildlife, fish, and plants across state lines, including imports and exports.
Conspiracy: The traffickers were charged with conspiracy to violate the Endangered Species Act and other environmental statutes.
Money Laundering: Some defendants were additionally charged with money laundering for using shell companies to hide the illegal proceeds.
Consequences
Several key figures in the ring were sentenced to lengthy prison terms ranging from 5 to 15 years.
Seizure of Assets: The U.S. authorities seized millions of dollars worth of ivory stockpiles and assets related to the illegal business.
International Cooperation: The case highlighted transnational enforcement cooperation between U.S. law enforcement, African authorities, and Asian nations involved in wildlife trafficking.
Significance
This case is significant as it shows that organized criminal networks involved in transnational wildlife trafficking can face severe penalties and underscores the need for global cooperation in fighting wildlife crimes.
Case 2: The "Tiger Bone" Smuggling Syndicate (China, 2017)
Jurisdiction: China, Laos, Vietnam, and other Southeast Asian countries
Background
Chinese authorities dismantled a major syndicate trafficking in tiger bones from Southeast Asia to China, where they were sold as luxury items and for traditional medicine. The syndicate operated multiple trafficking routes, using illegal tiger farms and coordinating smuggling via Laos and Vietnam.
Criminal Liability Analysis
Illegal Wildlife Trade: The accused individuals were charged under China’s Wildlife Protection Law and CITES, for smuggling and selling endangered species (tigers).
Illegal Possession and Trade: The court found that the traffickers knew or should have known that they were dealing with endangered species and were thus criminally liable for the illegal trade.
Cross-Border Smuggling: The trafficking network’s operations spanned several countries, implicating both domestic and international laws related to smuggling and conspiracy.
Consequences
The primary ringleaders of the syndicate were sentenced to life imprisonment.
Other members faced sentences ranging from 5 to 15 years.
The authorities also seized significant quantities of tiger bones, which were destroyed to prevent future trade.
Significance
The case is noteworthy because it highlights the intersection of traditional medicine, cultural practices, and wildlife trafficking in East Asia. It also demonstrates how cross-border smuggling networks can be infiltrated with international cooperation and stringent law enforcement.
Case 3: The "Pangolin Trafficking" Operation (South Africa, 2019)
Jurisdiction: South Africa, Hong Kong, Vietnam, Transnational
Background
A large-scale operation was conducted in South Africa against an organized crime syndicate that trafficked pangolins (the most trafficked mammal in the world). The traffickers were found to have been poaching pangolins and transporting them to Vietnam via Hong Kong for illegal consumption and trade in traditional medicine and luxury products.
Criminal Liability Analysis
Poaching and Smuggling: The primary offenders were charged under the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (NEMBA), which criminalizes the poaching, smuggling, and illegal trade of endangered species.
Conspiracy and Organized Crime: The traffickers were also charged with conspiracy under South Africa’s organized crime laws, as the operation was a sophisticated transnational trafficking network.
Consequences
Several key syndicate members received prison sentences ranging from 10 to 20 years.
The operation led to the seizure of 1,000+ pangolins and the dismantling of multiple smuggling routes.
The Hong Kong authorities collaborated to arrest the individuals responsible for receiving and distributing the pangolins in Asia.
Significance
This case demonstrates the severe criminal liability for individuals engaged in the poaching and illegal trafficking of critically endangered species. It also highlights the role of international cooperation in combating wildlife crime.
Case 4: The "Rhino Horn" Smuggling Ring (South Africa, 2015)
Jurisdiction: South Africa, Mozambique, and Vietnam
Background
A rhino horn trafficking ring was discovered operating between South Africa, Mozambique, and Vietnam. The syndicate was involved in the poaching of rhinos in South African national parks and the illegal shipment of rhino horns to Asia, where they were sold for use in traditional medicine.
Criminal Liability Analysis
Illegal Trade in Protected Species: The traffickers were prosecuted under South Africa’s Wildlife Protection Laws and CITES for illegally exporting rhino horns.
Poaching and Smuggling: The syndicate members were also charged with poaching and smuggling under the Conservation and National Parks Act.
Money Laundering: Some members were charged with money laundering as they attempted to hide the illicit profits from the illegal sale of rhino horns.
Consequences
Several individuals were arrested, and sentences ranged from 5 to 12 years.
The rhino horn stockpile was confiscated and later destroyed as part of South Africa’s efforts to eliminate the illicit trade.
The case prompted South African authorities to increase anti-poaching patrols and tighten regulations on wildlife product exports.
Significance
The case is significant because it showcases the high financial stakes involved in wildlife trafficking, as rhino horns are worth tens of thousands of dollars per kilogram. It also emphasizes the transnational nature of wildlife crime, involving multiple countries.
Case 5: The "Elephant Ivory" Trafficking Ring (Kenya, 2020)
Jurisdiction: Kenya, China, Transnational
Background
In Kenya, authorities cracked down on a criminal network involved in trafficking elephant ivory from poached elephants in East Africa. The ivory was being transported through Kenya and shipped to China for use in the ivory carving industry.
Criminal Liability Analysis
Wildlife Trafficking: The defendants were charged under Kenya’s Wildlife Conservation and Management Act for illegal ivory trade.
Cross-Border Smuggling: The syndicate was also charged with conspiracy, and smuggling across multiple borders, making the case a transnational crime.
Consequences
The traffickers faced prison sentences ranging from 7 to 15 years.
The authorities also seized the ivory stockpile and destroyed the illegal goods to prevent their circulation in global markets.
Significance
This case illustrates how organized crime is often involved in wildlife trafficking and highlights the importance of interstate and international cooperation to combat wildlife crimes effectively.
6. Conclusion
Transnational wildlife trafficking is a serious and organized crime that causes irreparable harm to biodiversity and national economies. Criminal liability in such cases is severe, and offenders can face long prison sentences, significant fines, and asset forfeiture. International cooperation through CITES, INTERPOL, and UNTOC is crucial in tackling these crimes. The cases highlighted above demonstrate the far-reaching impact of wildlife trafficking, showing the vital role of robust legal frameworks, cross-border cooperation, and enforcement to hold perpetrators accountable.
RELATED Blog
comments