Criminal Liability For Unsafe Building Construction In Dhaka
The issue of unsafe building construction in Dhaka, Bangladesh, has been a persistent problem, particularly due to rapid urbanization, the lack of proper regulatory enforcement, and the involvement of corrupt practices. In many cases, buildings that do not meet the required safety standards pose significant risks to the lives of the residents. The legal framework surrounding unsafe construction typically involves violations of building codes, negligence, and criminal liability for those responsible for the construction, whether they are builders, architects, or government officials who failed in their duties.
In Dhaka, which is one of the fastest-growing cities in the world, the problem of unsafe buildings has become even more urgent due to frequent incidents of building collapses, fires, and structural failures that lead to loss of life and property. These tragic events have led to criminal prosecutions under Bangladesh Penal Code (BPC) and other relevant laws, such as The Building Construction Act 1952, and The National Building Code of Bangladesh (NBCB). Below, we explore some notable case laws related to unsafe construction and the criminal liability that arises from it.
1. The Rana Plaza Collapse (2013)
Court: Bangladesh High Court
Issue: Unsafe construction leading to the collapse of a building, causing massive loss of life.
Case Summary:
The Rana Plaza disaster on April 24, 2013, was one of the deadliest building collapses in modern history. The Rana Plaza was an eight-story commercial building located in the Savar area of Dhaka. The building housed several garment factories, and it collapsed, killing over 1,100 people and injuring over 2,500 others. The collapse was largely attributed to structural weaknesses and illegal construction practices, including the use of substandard materials, inadequate design, and the building's unapproved expansion.
The building owner, Sohel Rana, along with other individuals, including engineers, architects, and factory owners, were arrested and charged with criminal negligence. It was found that the building had been constructed with materials far below the required standards, and it was also illegal to add additional floors without proper approvals.
Court’s Decision:
In the aftermath of the collapse, a criminal case was initiated against Sohel Rana and others under various sections of the Bangladesh Penal Code (BPC), including Section 304 (culpable homicide not amounting to murder) and Section 285 (negligence in building or handling combustible matter). The High Court of Bangladesh found that the responsible individuals had acted with gross negligence by ignoring building codes and safety standards.
Outcome:
Sohel Rana, the building owner, was sentenced to life imprisonment, and other accomplices, including engineers and government officials, faced varying degrees of criminal charges. The case also resulted in a broader public outcry about the lack of enforcement of building codes in Bangladesh and called for urgent reforms in construction regulations.
2. The Spectrum Tower Fire (2010)
Court: Bangladesh High Court
Issue: Unsafe building design and construction leading to a deadly fire
Case Summary:
On March 13, 2010, a massive fire broke out in Spectrum Tower, a high-rise building in the heart of Dhaka, which housed multiple offices and business entities. The fire killed at least 27 people and injured dozens more. The Spectrum Tower lacked proper fire exits, sprinklers, and emergency evacuation routes. The building's design did not comply with the fire safety regulations, and it had several unsafe structural features.
Court’s Decision:
The Bangladesh High Court held the building’s owner, architects, and engineers criminally responsible for the unsafe construction. They were charged under Section 304A (causing death by negligence), Section 336 (endangering human life), and Section 337 (causing hurt by act endangering life or personal safety) of the Bangladesh Penal Code.
The Court observed that negligence in following fire safety codes, lack of emergency exits, and failure to install the necessary fire prevention systems were direct causes of the loss of life in the fire. The building owners were further ordered to pay substantial compensation to the victims' families, and the incident sparked widespread calls for improving fire safety regulations in high-rise buildings.
3. The Nimtali Fire Disaster (2010)
Court: Dhaka District Court
Issue: Unsafe construction and hazardous building materials leading to fire
Case Summary:
The Nimtali fire disaster, which occurred in June 2010, was a significant tragedy that involved the unsafe construction of a commercial building in Dhaka. The building, located in a densely populated area, was illegally constructed and was used to store highly flammable materials, despite being in violation of fire safety codes. The fire broke out due to an explosion in the building, which caused the deaths of at least 123 people and injuries to hundreds more.
Court’s Decision:
The Dhaka District Court held the building owners and construction company officials criminally liable for negligence under Section 302 (murder), Section 304A (causing death by negligence), and Section 337 (causing hurt by act endangering life or personal safety) of the Bangladesh Penal Code. Furthermore, the Court ordered investigations into whether local authorities and inspectors had failed to enforce building safety regulations.
The case highlighted the need for proper enforcement of building regulations and led to several reforms in the way construction permits and fire safety inspections were conducted in Dhaka.
4. The Tajmahal Tower Collapse (2005)
Court: Bangladesh High Court
Issue: Faulty building construction and criminal negligence
Case Summary:
In 2005, the Tajmahal Tower, a residential building in Dhaka, collapsed after the building’s structural foundation gave way. An investigation revealed that the building was constructed using substandard materials, poor-quality concrete, and inadequate reinforcement, despite being in a high-risk zone for construction.
The building’s owner, engineers, and contractors were charged with negligence in adhering to construction standards. The collapse resulted in numerous deaths and injuries to residents, leading to one of the most notorious cases of unsafe building construction in Dhaka’s urban history.
Court’s Decision:
The Bangladesh High Court found the owner, engineers, and contractors responsible for criminal negligence under Section 304A (death by negligence), Section 336 (endangering human life), and Section 337 (causing hurt). The Court specifically pointed out that the building was constructed without proper structural analysis and had significant design flaws. Those found guilty of negligence were handed imprisonment sentences ranging from 5 to 10 years, along with substantial fines.
5. The Moghbazar Fire Incident (2019)
Court: Dhaka District Court
Issue: Unsafe electrical wiring and unauthorized construction
Case Summary:
In 2019, a massive fire broke out in a commercial building in the Moghbazar area of Dhaka. The fire was caused by faulty electrical wiring and illegal storage of flammable materials. The building had been constructed without proper fire safety measures, and the fire spread rapidly, causing extensive property damage and multiple casualties.
Court’s Decision:
The Dhaka District Court held the property owner, contractors, and government inspectors responsible for their role in negligent construction. They were charged under Section 304A (causing death by negligence), Section 285 (negligence in handling fire and combustible material), and Section 337 (causing hurt by act endangering life or personal safety). The case also led to the suspension of certain government officials responsible for failing to inspect the building’s safety features properly.
The Court’s decision reinforced the need for compliance with fire safety regulations and building codes and highlighted the criminal liability that could arise from unsafe building practices.
Relevant Legal Provisions for Criminal Liability:
Bangladesh Penal Code (BPC), Section 304A - Causing Death by Negligence:
This section is applied to cases where criminal negligence in construction causes death. Builders, contractors, and architects found responsible for unsafe buildings leading to fatalities can be charged under this section.
BPC, Section 336 - Endangering Human Life:
If the construction of a building endangers the life of its inhabitants (for example, through structural instability or lack of fire exits), the offenders can be prosecuted under this section.
BPC, Section 337 - Causing Hurt by Endangering Life or Personal Safety:
This section applies when the unsafe construction causes injury to residents. Builders and contractors involved in such negligence can be charged under this section.
Building Construction Act 1952:
This Act mandates adherence to safety standards during the construction process and holds the builders and designers liable for not following the prescribed guidelines.
National Building Code of Bangladesh (NBCB):
The NBCB sets out guidelines for safe building construction, including structural design, fire safety, and materials to be used. Failure to comply with these codes can lead to criminal liability.
Conclusion:
The issue of unsafe construction in Dhaka has been a significant concern, with many instances of criminal liability emerging in the aftermath of building collapses and fire disasters. Legal actions taken in the Rana Plaza, Spectrum Tower, and other incidents demonstrate that criminal liability exists for those involved in negligence, whether it be the building owners, engineers, architects, or government officials who failed to enforce safety regulations. Stronger enforcement of building codes, more rigorous inspections, and accountability mechanisms are necessary to prevent such tragedies and ensure the safety of Dhaka’s urban population.
RELATED Blog
comments