Criminal Liability Of Foreign Corporations In China
1. Concept Overview
Foreign corporations in China—whether wholly foreign-owned enterprises (WFOEs), joint ventures, or multinational subsidiaries—are subject to Chinese law, including criminal liability. Criminal liability arises when a foreign corporation or its representatives violate Chinese criminal law, administrative regulations, or environmental/financial rules.
Key Areas of Liability
Bribery and corruption – bribing government officials or private companies.
Environmental crimes – pollution, illegal waste disposal, or ecological damage.
Tax evasion and financial fraud – underreporting income or falsifying accounts.
Product safety and consumer protection violations – sale of unsafe or counterfeit goods.
Intellectual property violations – infringement of patents, trademarks, or copyrights.
Foreign companies can be held liable under Articles 31 and 32 of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China, which stipulate that corporations can be punished through fines, suspension of business, confiscation of illegal gains, and liability of executives.
2. Legal Framework for Foreign Corporations
| Law/Regulation | Key Provisions |
|---|---|
| Criminal Law (2015 Amendments) | Articles 31–32 establish corporate criminal liability; executives can be held personally responsible. |
| Environmental Protection Law (2014 Amendment) | Corporations responsible for pollution; foreign companies must comply equally with domestic standards. |
| Anti-Unfair Competition Law | Prohibits bribery, trade secret theft, and unfair competition. |
| Foreign Investment Law (2019) | Ensures that foreign enterprises are subject to the same criminal and administrative liabilities as domestic companies. |
| Securities Law & Anti-Fraud Regulations | Foreign-listed entities in China or trading on Chinese exchanges are liable for financial fraud and misreporting. |
Penalties for Foreign Corporations:
Fines and confiscation of illegal gains
Suspension or revocation of business licenses
Criminal liability for executives or representatives
Mandatory remediation for environmental or public health damages
3. Landmark Cases of Foreign Corporations in China
Case 1: Volkswagen Emissions Scandal (2015–2016)
Background:
Volkswagen was found to have installed defeat devices in diesel vehicles, enabling emissions tests to be bypassed.
Affected vehicles sold in China, violating environmental standards.
Court Findings:
Violation of Air Pollution Prevention Law and Criminal Law Article 338.
Local subsidiaries and executives held responsible for non-compliance.
Outcome:
Company fined ~1 billion RMB (~$150 million) in China.
Senior executives received administrative sanctions; remedial measures mandated.
Significance: Demonstrates liability of foreign multinationals for environmental fraud in China.
Case 2: GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Bribery Case (2013–2014)
Background:
GSK China was found guilty of bribing doctors and hospitals to promote drugs.
Bribes included cash, travel, and gifts totaling over 3 billion RMB (~$500 million).
Court Findings:
Violation of Criminal Law Articles 164 (bribery) and 385.
Senior executives responsible for orchestrating bribery.
Outcome:
Company fined 3 billion RMB; several executives imprisoned (3–4 years).
Company restructured internal compliance systems.
Significance: Landmark case proving that foreign corporations can face criminal fines and executive imprisonment for bribery.
Case 3: Daimler AG Bribery Case (2012–2016)
Background:
Daimler subsidiary in China paid bribes to car dealerships and officials to boost sales.
Court Findings:
Violated anti-corruption laws and Anti-Unfair Competition Law.
Chinese authorities imposed corporate liability; executives investigated.
Outcome:
Fine imposed; mandatory corporate compliance reforms required.
Significance: Highlights cross-border enforcement of anti-bribery laws against foreign corporations in China.
Case 4: Coca-Cola China Environmental Pollution Case (2010)
Background:
Coca-Cola’s bottling plants were accused of polluting local water sources in Guangdong and Guangxi provinces.
Court Findings:
Violations of Water Pollution Prevention Law.
Lack of proper waste treatment and environmental monitoring.
Outcome:
Company fined several million RMB; plants required to upgrade waste treatment systems.
Executives received administrative penalties.
Significance: Foreign corporations are held accountable for environmental standards in China.
Case 5: Caterpillar Equipment Bribery Case (2012)
Background:
Caterpillar’s Chinese subsidiary bribed government procurement officers to secure construction contracts.
Court Findings:
Violation of Criminal Law Article 164 (bribery).
Outcome:
Local subsidiary fined; senior manager imprisoned.
Mandatory corporate compliance program established.
Significance: Foreign companies cannot evade liability for corporate bribery in China.
Case 6: IKEA Fire Safety Negligence (2011–2012)
Background:
IKEA stores in China were found non-compliant with fire safety regulations, endangering public safety.
Court Findings:
Violated Public Security Administration Law and Criminal Law Article 144 (negligence leading to public danger).
Outcome:
Stores fined; required to upgrade safety measures.
Executives held administratively responsible.
Significance: Shows that foreign corporations face criminal liability for negligence affecting public safety.
4. Key Legal Principles from Cases
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Equality Before Law | Foreign corporations are treated the same as domestic companies in criminal liability. |
| Executive Liability | Senior managers or representatives can face prison for criminal acts of the company. |
| Corporate Fines and Remediation | Companies face fines, confiscation of illegal gains, and must remediate damage. |
| Cross-Border Enforcement | Multinationals cannot rely on their home country’s regulations to bypass Chinese law. |
| Compliance Programs Required | Post-violation, companies often must implement compliance and anti-bribery programs. |
| Severe Penalties for Bribery and Environmental Crimes | Bribery, pollution, or public safety violations lead to fines, imprisonment, or operational restrictions. |
5. Summary Table of Cases
| Case | Corporation | Crime | Penalty | Key Takeaway |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volkswagen (2015) | Foreign multinational | Environmental fraud | ~1B RMB fine, executive sanctions | Environmental liability in China |
| GSK (2013–14) | Foreign pharmaceutical | Bribery | 3B RMB fine, execs imprisoned | Corporate bribery criminally punished |
| Daimler (2012–16) | Automotive | Bribery | Fine, compliance reforms | Cross-border anti-corruption enforcement |
| Coca-Cola (2010) | FMCG | Environmental pollution | Fines, plant upgrades | Environmental compliance required |
| Caterpillar (2012) | Heavy equipment | Bribery | Fine, exec imprisonment | Foreign companies liable for corruption |
| IKEA (2011–12) | Retail | Negligence / public safety | Fines, safety upgrades | Liability for public safety violations |
6. Conclusion
Foreign corporations operating in China are fully subject to Chinese criminal law, and the government actively enforces liability for bribery, environmental crimes, financial fraud, and negligence.
Key points:
Foreign = Domestic: Companies cannot claim immunity; Chinese law applies.
Executives are personally liable for corporate wrongdoing.
Severe penalties include fines, imprisonment, and license suspension.
Compliance and internal controls are crucial for multinational corporations to operate safely in China.
Cross-border implications: violations often affect global reputation and home-country legal exposure.
RELATED Blog
comments