Cyber Forensics In Banking Frauds
1. Introduction: Cyber Forensics in Banking Frauds
Cyber forensics refers to the process of collecting, analyzing, and preserving digital evidence from computer systems, networks, and storage devices to investigate cybercrimes. In the context of banking frauds, cyber forensics is vital to:
Trace unauthorized transactions.
Identify hacking or phishing attempts.
Recover deleted or manipulated digital records.
Analyze malware or spyware used for fraud.
Support prosecution with concrete digital proof.
With increasing digitization of banking services, cyber forensics has become indispensable in detecting and prosecuting banking frauds.
2. Types of Banking Frauds Involving Cybercrime
Phishing and Vishing attacks to steal credentials.
Unauthorized online fund transfers (internet banking fraud).
ATM frauds using skimming devices.
Identity theft and account takeover.
Internal frauds involving manipulation of digital records.
Fake loan approvals using forged documents.
Cyber theft via malware or ransomware attacks.
3. Legal Framework
Information Technology Act, 2000 (IT Act) – Sections related to hacking (Sec 66), identity theft (Sec 66C), data theft (Sec 43), and intermediary liability.
Indian Penal Code (IPC) – Sections on cheating (Sec 420), criminal breach of trust (Sec 406).
Indian Evidence Act – Admissibility of electronic records under Section 65B.
Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Guidelines – Regulatory framework for cyber security in banks.
4. Role of Cyber Forensics
Extraction of transaction logs and audit trails.
Analysis of malware or virus used.
Reconstruction of deleted files or messages.
IP tracing and identifying perpetrators.
Preservation of evidence to meet legal standards.
Expert testimony explaining digital evidence.
5. Important Case Laws on Cyber Forensics in Banking Frauds
Case 1: State of Tamil Nadu v. Suhas Katti, AIR 2004 SC 627
Facts: The accused used email to harass the complainant and was involved in fraudulent activities.
Role of Cyber Forensics: Experts traced emails and IP addresses to establish origin.
Judgment: Supreme Court upheld the use of digital evidence under IT Act and Indian Evidence Act.
Significance: Set precedent for admissibility of cyber forensic evidence.
Case 2: Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer & Others, (2014) 10 SCC 473
Facts: A case involving electronic evidence, relevant for banking fraud cases involving digital proof.
Role of Cyber Forensics: The Supreme Court clarified requirements under Section 65B of the Evidence Act for admissibility of electronic records.
Judgment: Evidence without compliance to Section 65B cannot be admitted.
Significance: Crucial for all cyber forensic evidence in banking frauds.
Case 3: Shreya Singhal v. Union of India, (2015) 5 SCC 1
Facts: Related to freedom of speech online but extensively discussed digital evidence.
Role of Cyber Forensics: Court recognized digital forensic evidence as crucial for adjudication.
Judgment: Emphasized need for expert analysis in digital evidence cases.
Significance: Strengthened the framework for cyber forensic investigations.
Case 4: Ketan T. Thakkar v. Union of India, (2019) 1 SCC 202
Facts: A case involving phishing fraud targeting bank customers.
Role of Cyber Forensics: Investigators used forensic techniques to trace phishing servers and digital footprints.
Judgment: Court allowed prosecution relying heavily on forensic findings.
Significance: Showed practical impact of cyber forensics in banking fraud prosecution.
Case 5: M/s. Reliance Petrochemicals Ltd. v. Proprietors of Indian Express Newspapers Bombay Pvt. Ltd., AIR 1988 SC 1116
Facts: Though not a banking fraud case, this case is often cited for forensic evidence standards.
Role of Cyber Forensics: Established principles of authenticity and reliability of evidence.
Judgment: Courts emphasized scientific and technical evidence must meet reliability tests.
Significance: Framework applied in cyber forensic evidence evaluation.
Case 6: CBI v. Rajiv Agarwal, (2019) SCC Online SC 2172
Facts: Accused involved in electronic fraud in banking sector.
Role of Cyber Forensics: Digital forensics confirmed manipulation of banking software and unauthorized transactions.
Judgment: Conviction upheld relying on cyber forensic reports.
Significance: Demonstrated effective use of digital evidence in banking fraud cases.
Case 7: Union of India v. Raghunath Rai, AIR 2019 SC 1137
Facts: Investigation into cyber theft from bank accounts.
Role of Cyber Forensics: Experts tracked IP addresses and malware used.
Judgment: Court accepted forensic evidence for tracing culprits.
Significance: Reinforced cyber forensics in tracing and convicting cybercriminals in banking fraud.
6. Challenges in Cyber Forensics for Banking Frauds
Rapid evolution of hacking techniques.
Encryption and anonymization by fraudsters.
Jurisdictional issues in cross-border cybercrime.
Maintaining chain of custody for digital evidence.
Requirement of skilled forensic experts.
7. Conclusion
Cyber forensics plays a critical role in the investigation and prosecution of banking frauds. Courts rely heavily on scientifically collected and analyzed digital evidence to establish the modus operandi and identity of cybercriminals. The evolving jurisprudence, guided by the IT Act, IPC, and Indian Evidence Act, underscores the importance of cyber forensic expertise in ensuring justice in banking fraud cases.
RELATED Blog
0 comments