Definition Of Trade Secret.
Trade Secret
A trade secret refers to any confidential business information that provides a competitive advantage to a company. Trade secrets are not publicly known, and efforts are made to maintain secrecy. Unlike patents, trade secrets do not require registration, but they are legally protected against misappropriation.
Legal Definitions
Under Indian Law:
India does not have a codified Trade Secrets Act, but trade secrets are protected under:
Contract Law (Confidentiality Agreements, NDAs)
Common Law principles of equity (e.g., breach of confidence)
Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (restrictions on contracts in restraint of trade)
Intellectual Property Rights enforcement (when trade secrets are part of confidential know-how).
International Perspective:
TRIPS Agreement (Article 39) defines trade secrets as:
“Information which is secret, has commercial value because it is secret, and has been subject to reasonable steps to keep it secret.”
Key Elements of a Trade Secret
Secrecy: Not known to the public or competitors.
Economic Value: Provides a competitive business advantage.
Reasonable Steps for Protection: Confidentiality agreements, restricted access, encryption, etc.
Information Type: Can include formulas, processes, methods, designs, customer lists, financial data, marketing strategies, etc.
Detailed Case Laws on Trade Secrets
1. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. vs. Cipla Ltd. (2008, Delhi High Court)
Facts: Cipla allegedly copied the formulation and manufacturing process of Roche’s patented drug.
Issue: Whether Roche’s confidential manufacturing know-how qualifies as a trade secret.
Observation:
Court recognized manufacturing process not disclosed in patent as a trade secret.
Cipla’s alleged misuse of confidential information was actionable.
Significance:
Highlighted that trade secrets protect unpatented know-how, especially in pharma and biotech industries.
2. PepsiCo Inc. vs. Redington India Ltd. (2000)
Facts: PepsiCo accused former employees of disclosing proprietary marketing strategies and formulas to competitors.
Issue: Whether marketing strategies and internal processes are trade secrets.
Observation:
Court held that confidential business information providing competitive advantage qualifies as trade secret.
Breach of confidentiality agreements amounted to misappropriation.
Significance:
Extended trade secret protection to business processes, marketing, and strategic information.
3. Cadbury India Ltd. vs. ITC Ltd. (2006)
Facts: Cadbury claimed ITC copied its chocolate recipes and manufacturing processes.
Issue: Whether secret recipes constitute a trade secret.
Observation:
Court affirmed that secret formulas are trade secrets if:
They are not publicly known
They provide commercial advantage
They are subject to reasonable measures to maintain secrecy
Significance:
Reinforced that culinary or product formulas fall within trade secret protection.
4. Google Inc. vs. Onkyo Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. (2012)
Facts: Google alleged leakage of confidential source code and algorithms by employees.
Issue: Can source code and algorithms be considered trade secrets?
Observation:
Court recognized digital source code and algorithms as trade secrets.
Reasonable protection steps (passwords, access control, NDAs) are essential.
Significance:
Established that software code, algorithms, and technical know-how are protected as trade secrets.
5. Bayer Corporation vs. Union of India (2014)
Facts: Alleged theft of confidential manufacturing and research data.
Issue: Whether research data and experimental know-how can be trade secrets.
Observation:
Court held that research results, experimental processes, and confidential technical data constitute trade secrets.
Reasonable steps for secrecy were taken (restricted lab access, confidentiality agreements).
Significance:
Highlighted that R&D data and laboratory methods are core trade secrets, even if unpublished.
6. Infosys Ltd. vs. U.B. Sharma (2015, Karnataka High Court)
Facts: Ex-employee allegedly copied internal client software modules and strategies for competitor.
Issue: Whether internal documentation and software modules constitute trade secrets.
Observation:
Court held that confidential internal modules and client strategies are trade secrets.
Breach of NDAs constitutes actionable misappropriation.
Significance:
Reinforced employee obligations and company rights in protecting trade secrets.
Key Principles from Case Laws
Trade secret = confidential + economically valuable + reasonable steps to protect.
Employee obligations: NDAs and employment contracts are key in enforcement.
Broad scope: Includes formulas, methods, processes, software code, marketing strategies, R&D data.
No registration required: Protection is through equity, contract law, and IP enforcement.
Export and global relevance: Trade secrets often apply internationally, especially for multinational companies.
✅ Conclusion
Trade secrets are critical for business competitiveness. Indian courts have consistently recognized that confidential technical information, product formulas, marketing strategies, software, and R&D data can be protected under common law principles and contractual obligations, even without formal registration. The key is secrecy, commercial value, and reasonable steps to protect the information.
RELATED Blog
comments