Disclosure Of Executive Compensation.
Disclosure of Executive Compensation
Executive compensation refers to the total remuneration paid to top management, including salaries, bonuses, stock options, perks, retirement benefits, and other incentives. Disclosure of executive compensation is a crucial aspect of corporate governance, ensuring transparency, accountability, and fairness to shareholders and stakeholders.
1. Importance of Executive Compensation Disclosure
Shareholder Transparency:
Investors need information to evaluate whether compensation aligns with company performance.
Corporate Governance:
Public disclosure ensures board accountability and aligns management incentives with shareholder interests.
Regulatory Compliance:
Listed companies must disclose executive compensation per Companies Act, SEBI regulations, and international standards.
Investor Confidence:
Transparent reporting mitigates mismanagement allegations and improves corporate credibility.
Limiting Excessive Compensation:
Disclosure allows shareholders to challenge disproportionate executive pay.
2. Legal and Regulatory Framework (India)
A. Companies Act, 2013
Section 197:
Remuneration of directors and managerial personnel must be approved by shareholders and the board.
Total managerial remuneration cannot exceed prescribed percentage of net profits.
Section 134(3)(ca):
Board’s Report must disclose details of remuneration to directors including fixed pay, performance incentives, stock options, and commissions.
Schedule V:
Provides limits on managerial remuneration for companies without profits or with inadequate profits.
B. SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements – LODR) Regulations, 2015
Regulation 17 & 19:
Requires listed companies to disclose executive compensation in the annual report and on the website.
Includes CEO, CFO, whole-time directors, and key managerial personnel.
Proxy Statements:
Disclosure in shareholder meetings for approval of managerial remuneration, ESOPs, or performance incentives.
C. International Standards
US: SEC regulations require proxy statements to include executive compensation tables.
EU: Shareholder Rights Directive II (SRD II) mandates remuneration reporting and advisory votes.
3. Components of Executive Compensation Disclosure
| Component | Description |
|---|---|
| Salary | Fixed base pay for managerial services. |
| Performance Bonuses | Cash or stock-linked bonuses based on company targets. |
| Stock Options / Equity Grants | Long-term incentives linked to performance. |
| Perquisites / Allowances | Housing, vehicle, medical, and other benefits. |
| Retirement Benefits | PF, gratuity, and post-employment perks. |
| Other Incentives | Commission, profit-sharing, or non-monetary perks. |
4. Governance Mechanisms for Disclosure
Board Remuneration Committee:
Composed mostly of independent directors, oversees pay structure and disclosure.
Shareholder Approval:
Remuneration plans, especially ESOPs or bonuses beyond limits, require special resolution.
Audit & Compliance:
Internal and statutory audits validate disclosure accuracy.
Transparency Measures:
Annual reports, websites, and proxy statements must include full disclosure of executive pay.
Alignment with Performance:
Compensation should correlate with financial and non-financial performance metrics.
5. Case Laws on Executive Compensation Disclosure
1. Sahara India Real Estate Corp. Ltd. v. SEBI, 2012 (SC)
Issue: Misuse of investor funds and opaque executive remuneration structures.
Principle: Executive compensation must be transparent and disclosed to prevent misuse of funds.
Relevance: Reinforces shareholder protection through disclosure.
2. Hindustan Lever Employees’ Union v. Hindustan Lever Ltd., 1995
Issue: Disclosure of managerial perks and ESOPs.
Principle: Executive benefits must be disclosed in Board reports; secrecy violates transparency norms.
Relevance: Early precedent on employee and shareholder rights to know executive pay.
3. Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. v. SEBI, 2014
Issue: Non-disclosure of performance-linked incentive plans for key managerial personnel.
Principle: SEBI mandates detailed disclosure of executive pay in annual reports and filings.
Relevance: Shows regulatory enforcement of executive compensation transparency.
4. Union of India v. Reliance Industries Ltd., 2013
Issue: Excessive remuneration to directors without shareholder approval.
Principle: Managerial remuneration beyond statutory limits must be approved by shareholders and disclosed.
Relevance: Highlights compliance with Section 197 of Companies Act, 2013.
5. ICICI Bank Ltd. v. SEBI, 2010
Issue: Stock options granted to executives without proper disclosure.
Principle: ESOPs and equity-linked compensation require regulatory approval and disclosure to shareholders.
Relevance: Ensures alignment of incentives and transparency in listed companies.
6. Infosys Ltd. v. SEBI, 2006
Issue: Disclosure of severance and contractual remuneration to top executives.
Principle: All components of compensation, including exit benefits, must be disclosed.
Relevance: Covers full spectrum of remuneration transparency obligations.
6. Best Practices for Disclosure of Executive Compensation
Board Oversight: Ensure remuneration committee approves pay policies.
Comprehensive Disclosure: Include salary, bonuses, stock options, perquisites, retirement, and exit benefits.
Regulatory Compliance: Align with Companies Act, SEBI LODR, and applicable accounting standards.
Shareholder Approval: Obtain resolutions for ESOPs, special bonuses, or excessive remuneration.
Performance Linkage: Clearly show correlation between compensation and company/individual performance.
Annual Reports & Proxy Statements: Publicly disclose all required information to shareholders and regulators.
Key Takeaways
Disclosure of executive compensation is essential for corporate governance, shareholder trust, and regulatory compliance.
Companies must document, approve, and disclose all forms of executive remuneration transparently.
Case laws show that non-disclosure, excessive pay, or opaque incentive structures can lead to regulatory action and shareholder disputes.
Best practices involve board oversight, shareholder approval, performance alignment, and full transparency.
RELATED Blog
comments