Dispute Settlement Mechanism under UNCLOS
Dispute Settlement Mechanism under UNCLOS
1. Introduction
The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), often called the “Constitution of the Oceans,” provides a comprehensive legal framework for the use of the world’s seas and oceans. It includes detailed provisions for peaceful resolution of disputes arising out of the interpretation or application of the Convention.
2. Scope of Disputes Covered
UNCLOS dispute settlement covers disputes related to:
Maritime boundaries and delimitation
Navigation rights and freedoms
Protection and preservation of the marine environment
Marine scientific research
Fisheries jurisdiction
Continental shelf claims
Innocent passage and transit passage
Enforcement and compliance with UNCLOS obligations
3. General Principles
States are encouraged to settle disputes by peaceful means (Article 279).
Disputes should be resolved through negotiation, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, or judicial settlement.
Parties must make every effort to resolve disputes amicably.
4. Dispute Settlement Procedures under UNCLOS
a. Choice of Forum (Article 287)
When ratifying UNCLOS, states declare the procedure(s) they accept for compulsory dispute settlement:
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS)
International Court of Justice (ICJ)
Arbitral Tribunal established under Annex VII of UNCLOS
Special Arbitral Tribunal established under Annex VIII of UNCLOS (for certain specified categories)
If parties have agreed on the procedure, that forum will have jurisdiction.
If no agreement exists, Annex VII arbitration is the default mechanism.
b. Specialized Dispute Settlement Tribunals
| Tribunal | Jurisdiction/Function |
|---|---|
| ITLOS | General jurisdiction for law of the sea disputes, interim measures, prompt release of vessels/crew |
| ICJ | Disputes between states on general international law, including UNCLOS |
| Annex VII Arbitral Tribunal | Default arbitration panel for general disputes |
| Annex VIII Special Tribunals | Specific disputes: e.g., fisheries, marine environment, scientific research |
5. Interim Measures (Article 290)
Parties may request provisional measures to preserve rights or prevent serious harm during dispute resolution.
ITLOS or arbitral tribunals can prescribe such measures pending final decision.
6. Mandatory Nature and Binding Decisions
The dispute settlement under UNCLOS is generally compulsory for parties that have accepted a procedure.
Decisions and awards are final and binding on the parties (Article 296).
Parties must comply in good faith.
7. Non-Compliance and Enforcement
UNCLOS itself does not provide direct enforcement mechanisms.
Non-compliance can lead to diplomatic and political pressure.
Possible referral to the UN Security Council for enforcement measures (as per UN Charter).
8. Exclusions and Reservations
Some disputes, e.g., those related to military activities or historic bays, may be excluded or treated differently.
States may exclude certain dispute categories from compulsory procedures by declaration.
9. Recent Notable Cases
Philippines vs China (South China Sea Arbitration, 2016) under Annex VII Arbitration.
Gabon vs Equatorial Guinea (Maritime boundary dispute) before ITLOS.
Mauritius vs Maldives (Maritime boundary dispute) before ITLOS.
Summary Table of Dispute Mechanisms under UNCLOS
| Forum | Basis | Jurisdiction | Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| ITLOS | Part XV & Annex VI | General disputes, prompt release, provisional measures | Permanent tribunal, specialized |
| International Court of Justice | General intl. law | Disputes between states on intl. law issues | Permanent, broad jurisdiction |
| Annex VII Arbitral Tribunal | Annex VII | Default arbitration of disputes | Ad hoc, panel of 5 arbitrators |
| Annex VIII Special Tribunals | Annex VIII | Specific disputes (fisheries, environment) | Ad hoc, limited scope |
Do write to us if you need any further assistance.
RELATED Blog
0 comments