Disputes Over Hydro, Thermal, Biomass, Solar, And Wind Plant Installation Defects
1. Overview
Energy generation projects—hydro, thermal, biomass, solar, and wind—require precise engineering and installation. Defects in these plants can lead to safety risks, operational downtime, reduced energy output, and financial losses.
Common types of defects:
Hydro Plants: Dam or penstock leakage, turbine misalignment, foundation cracks
Thermal Plants: Boiler or turbine defects, piping and insulation failure, control system errors
Biomass Plants: Combustion system inefficiencies, feedstock handling defects
Solar Plants: Module mounting defects, inverter failures, wiring and connection issues
Wind Farms: Turbine blade defects, gearbox or generator failures, foundation or tower issues
Causes of defects:
Poor design or engineering miscalculations
Substandard materials or faulty equipment
Inadequate installation, testing, or commissioning
Non-compliance with codes and environmental standards
Operational integration issues and lack of preventive maintenance
Disputes commonly involve project owners, EPC contractors, equipment suppliers, and consultants, and arbitration is preferred due to:
High-value contracts
Complex technical and environmental issues
Confidentiality and expedited resolution
2. Common Issues in Arbitration
Design vs Execution: Determining whether defects are caused by faulty design, poor installation, or equipment failure.
Operational Shortfalls: Reduced energy generation or failure to meet guaranteed performance levels.
Safety and Environmental Hazards: Damages due to leakage, fire, or structural failure.
Equipment and System Failures: Turbines, generators, inverters, boilers, and control systems failing prematurely.
Delays and Financial Losses: Operational downtime, cost overruns, or contractual penalties.
Remedies: Rectification, replacement, retrofitting, re-commissioning, or financial compensation.
3. Illustrative Case Laws in Arbitration
Case 1: HydroPower Ltd. vs. Global EPC Contractors (2015)
Issue: Leakage in penstocks of a hydro plant shortly after commissioning.
Arbitration Findings: Faulty welding and inadequate inspection; design mostly compliant.
Outcome: Contractor liable; rectification and compensation for downtime awarded.
Case 2: Thermal Energy Co. vs. Boiler Systems Pvt. Ltd. (2016)
Issue: Boiler tubes and piping failed during initial operation.
Arbitration Findings: Substandard material and poor installation; contractor executed per design.
Outcome: Shared liability; rectification, replacement, and supervision costs awarded.
Case 3: Biomass Power Pvt. Ltd. vs. EcoEnergy Solutions (2017)
Issue: Combustion system inefficiency causing underperformance.
Arbitration Findings: Incorrect alignment and installation errors; design compliant.
Outcome: Contractor liable; arbitration awarded reinstallation and compensation for lost generation.
Case 4: SolarPark Ltd. vs. Photovoltaic Systems Pvt. Ltd. (2018)
Issue: Mounting frames and inverters defective, causing module misalignment.
Arbitration Findings: Poor installation and commissioning; materials compliant.
Outcome: Contractor responsible; arbitration directed rectification, re-commissioning, and compensation.
Case 5: WindEnergy Pvt. Ltd. vs. TurbineWorks Ltd. (2019)
Issue: Turbine gearbox and blade failures within warranty period.
Arbitration Findings: Manufacturing defects in gearbox; installation compliant.
Outcome: Supplier liable; arbitration awarded repair and replacement costs.
Case 6: Integrated Renewable Energy vs. EPC Solutions Ltd. (2020)
Issue: Multiple generation units underperformed due to control system defects.
Arbitration Findings: Faulty software integration and inadequate commissioning; equipment compliant.
Outcome: Contractor liable; arbitration directed reprogramming, system re-commissioning, and compensation for energy shortfall.
4. Practical Lessons from Arbitration
Independent Technical Assessment: Experts in electrical, mechanical, civil, and renewable systems are critical to determine liability.
Clear Contractual Scope: Define responsibilities for design, equipment supply, installation, commissioning, and performance guarantees.
Shared Liability: Failures may involve multiple parties, including contractors, consultants, and suppliers.
Documentation Matters: Inspection logs, equipment certificates, commissioning reports, and as-built drawings strengthen claims.
Timely Reporting: Early identification and reporting of defects ensures enforceability under arbitration clauses.
Preventive Measures: Quality audits, phased commissioning, equipment testing, and proper maintenance reduce operational and legal risks.
RELATED Blog
comments