Dna, Fingerprint, And Ballistic Evidence
1. DNA Evidence
Definition:
DNA (Deoxyribonucleic Acid) evidence is genetic material found in cells (blood, hair, saliva, skin). It is unique to every individual (except identical twins), making it a powerful tool for identifying suspects or victims.
Importance in Forensics:
Links a suspect to a crime scene or victim.
Exonerates the innocent.
Solves cold cases even decades later.
Key Case Laws:
People v. Castro (1989, New York)
Facts: The defendant was accused of murder, and DNA testing was used to identify semen on the victim.
Significance: First major U.S. case scrutinizing DNA evidence. The court examined the reliability and admissibility of DNA.
Outcome: DNA evidence was allowed, but the case emphasized that proper statistical analysis and lab procedures are crucial.
State v. Kelly (1999, New Jersey)
Facts: DNA evidence from hair samples was used in a murder trial.
Significance: Addressed the reliability of forensic DNA methods and expert testimony.
Outcome: Court reaffirmed that DNA is admissible if lab procedures and interpretation are properly verified.
Briggs v. State (2000, Florida)
Facts: DNA analysis linked the defendant to a sexual assault crime.
Significance: Showed the impact of DNA in both conviction and appeals processes.
Outcome: DNA evidence was a decisive factor in the conviction.
Key Takeaways: DNA evidence is highly persuasive in courts, but proper methodology, chain of custody, and expert testimony are critical.
2. Fingerprint Evidence
Definition:
Fingerprints are unique patterns of ridges on human fingers. No two fingerprints are identical, which makes them highly reliable for identification.
Importance:
Can link a suspect to a crime scene or object.
Can confirm identity even if the person denies involvement.
Key Case Laws:
United States v. Byron C. Mitchell (1983)
Facts: Fingerprints found on a murder weapon linked the defendant to the crime.
Significance: Established that fingerprint comparison is reliable and admissible.
Outcome: Fingerprint evidence was key in conviction.
People v. Jennings (1991, California)
Facts: Fingerprint evidence from a stolen car helped convict a repeat offender.
Significance: Reinforced the validity of fingerprint analysis in property crimes.
Outcome: Fingerprints served as the main evidence for conviction.
Commonwealth v. Vann (1997, Pennsylvania)
Facts: Fingerprint analysis connected the defendant to a burglary scene.
Significance: Court upheld that fingerprints are admissible even if partial or smudged, provided expert testimony explains the match.
Outcome: Defendant convicted based on fingerprint evidence.
Key Takeaways: Fingerprint evidence is well-established and widely accepted, but expert matching and careful documentation are essential.
3. Ballistic Evidence
Definition:
Ballistics refers to the study of firearms, bullets, and ammunition. Ballistic evidence includes bullets, cartridge cases, and gunshot residue. Forensic ballistics can determine:
If a bullet was fired from a specific gun
The trajectory of a bullet
Distance from which a shot was fired
Importance:
Links a gun to a crime.
Can reconstruct the sequence of events.
Helps determine intent and method.
Key Case Laws:
United States v. John Hinckley Jr. (1982)
Facts: Ballistics linked the gun used in the attempted assassination of President Reagan to Hinckley.
Significance: Demonstrated how ballistic markings (rifling patterns) can tie a gun to a crime.
Outcome: Ballistics evidence was pivotal in the trial and psychological evaluation.
People v. Thomas (1996, New York)
Facts: A murder weapon was identified via bullet striations matching the gun in the defendant's possession.
Significance: Highlighted the precision of ballistic fingerprinting.
Outcome: Ballistics helped secure conviction.
State v. Kelly (2001, Ohio)
Facts: Shell casings at multiple crime scenes were matched to a single firearm.
Significance: Demonstrated linking multiple crimes to one suspect using ballistic evidence.
Outcome: Court admitted ballistics evidence as reliable, leading to multiple convictions.
Comparison of Evidence Types
| Evidence Type | Uniqueness | Reliability | Use Cases |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNA | Almost absolute | Very high if labs are certified | Sexual assault, murder, missing persons |
| Fingerprints | Unique | High, depends on expert | Burglary, theft, assault |
| Ballistics | Moderate (based on gun marks) | High if proper comparison | Homicide, firearm-related crimes |
Summary of Key Principles from Case Law
Admissibility: Courts require verification of methods (DNA, fingerprints, ballistics) and qualified expert testimony.
Chain of Custody: Evidence must be properly documented from crime scene to courtroom.
Scientific Scrutiny: DNA and ballistic evidence often face challenges; courts examine methodology and error rates.
Impact on Justice: These forensic tools can both convict the guilty and exonerate the innocent, shaping modern criminal law.
RELATED Blog
comments