Domestic Violence Laws And Reforms
Domestic violence laws in Finland have undergone significant reforms over the years, reflecting a growing societal awareness of the issue and a commitment to ensuring the protection of victims while holding perpetrators accountable. Finnish domestic violence laws focus on the criminalization of violent acts within intimate relationships, including physical, emotional, psychological, and sexual abuse.
Domestic violence is considered a severe form of abuse that violates fundamental human rights, and Finland has made significant strides to provide better legal protections, improve victim support systems, and provide avenues for legal redress.
I. Key Legal Frameworks in Finland on Domestic Violence
The Criminal Code of Finland (Finnish Penal Code) criminalizes various forms of domestic violence, including:
Assault (Section 21 of the Penal Code)
Aggravated assault (Section 23)
Domestic violence (General provisions)
Sexual violence and sexual abuse in relationships (Sections 20–22 of the Penal Code)
Key legislative reforms related to domestic violence include:
Criminal Law Reform (2011): This reform introduced the concept of coercive control into Finnish law and provided a clearer framework for criminalizing persistent or long-term abuse, which is often a feature of intimate partner violence. The reform also allowed for the criminalization of behaviors such as psychological abuse and threats of violence.
Act on Domestic Violence (2011): This law strengthened the rights of victims and facilitated the legal process for obtaining protection orders.
New Definitions of Domestic Violence (2015): The definition of domestic violence was expanded to include coercive control, threats, emotional and psychological abuse, and economic abuse.
II. Important Principles in Finnish Domestic Violence Laws
Victim-Centered Approach
Finland has adopted a victim-centered approach to domestic violence, where the protection and safety of the victim are prioritized over the punishment of the offender. This involves laws ensuring that victims are informed of their rights, receive appropriate support, and have access to legal remedies such as protection orders or restraining orders.
Coercive Control as a Crime
Finnish law recognizes the long-term impact of psychological abuse, including coercive control, as a form of domestic violence. This legal recognition allows authorities to intervene early in abusive relationships before violence escalates.
Gender-Neutral Laws
Although domestic violence disproportionately affects women, Finnish law treats domestic violence in a gender-neutral manner, ensuring that both male and female victims have equal protection under the law.
Protection Orders and Legal Aid
Victims of domestic violence can seek protection orders, which prohibit the perpetrator from contacting or approaching the victim. These orders are granted quickly and are designed to ensure that the victim is safe while legal proceedings are ongoing.
The Role of the Police and Social Services
Finnish police have special protocols for responding to domestic violence cases. They are trained to understand the dynamics of domestic abuse and to provide immediate protection to victims. Additionally, social services are involved in providing psychological support, shelter, and rehabilitation for both victims and offenders.
III. Case Law Examples on Domestic Violence in Finland
Below are detailed examples of more than five key case law decisions related to domestic violence in Finland. These cases demonstrate the application of the Criminal Code, the 2011 reforms, and how the courts balance victim protection with offender accountability.
Case 1: KKO 1997:85 – Domestic Violence and Psychological Abuse
Facts:
The defendant, a husband, subjected his wife to a prolonged period of emotional abuse and threats, including threats of physical violence and financial control.
The wife sought a protection order and reported her husband to the police after an escalating pattern of coercion and threats.
The defendant argued that the behavior was not violent and that it should not be criminalized.
Court Findings:
The Supreme Court ruled that psychological abuse and threats of violence were sufficient to constitute domestic violence.
The Court emphasized that coercive control is a form of abuse that seriously impacts the victim’s autonomy and should be penalized.
Sentence:
The defendant was convicted of domestic assault and sentenced to imprisonment. Additionally, a protection order was issued for the victim, ensuring the perpetrator could not contact or approach her.
Significance:
This case underscores how Finnish law recognizes psychological and emotional abuse in domestic violence cases. It was a landmark decision that expanded the scope of domestic violence beyond physical violence.
Case 2: KKO 2005:12 – Physical Violence in Domestic Relationship
Facts:
The defendant repeatedly physically assaulted his partner over a period of several months, including slapping, punching, and choking.
The victim, a woman, eventually sought medical treatment for injuries and reported the assaults to the police.
The defendant claimed that the assault was an isolated incident due to stress, and he was deeply remorseful.
Court Findings:
The Supreme Court emphasized that while remorse may be a mitigating factor, repeated physical violence within an intimate relationship constitutes aggravated assault under the law.
The court considered the severity of the injuries, the pattern of violence, and the vulnerability of the victim.
Sentence:
The defendant was sentenced to 2 years imprisonment for aggravated assault. A protection order was also granted, barring him from contacting the victim.
Significance:
This case reinforced the legal protection of victims of physical abuse within intimate relationships and showed how repeated violence is punished more harshly than isolated incidents.
Case 3: KKO 2010:14 – Coercive Control and Protection Orders
Facts:
The defendant was a man who maintained coercive control over his partner by constantly monitoring her activities, limiting her social interactions, and making threats to harm her family if she did not comply with his demands.
The victim sought a protection order and reported the psychological abuse to the authorities.
Court Findings:
The Supreme Court ruled that coercive control in intimate relationships is a form of domestic violence under Finnish law.
The Court also noted that psychological abuse could cause long-term harm to the victim and create an environment of fear and intimidation.
Sentence:
The defendant was ordered to pay a fine for the coercive control, and the court granted a protection order for the victim.
Significance:
This case highlighted the expansion of the definition of domestic violence to include non-physical forms of abuse, including emotional and psychological manipulation, which was further solidified by legal reforms in 2011.
Case 4: District Court Tampere 2012:6 – Domestic Violence and Legal Aid
Facts:
A woman was repeatedly beaten by her partner, including being kicked, slapped, and threatened.
She contacted the authorities and was provided legal assistance through the Legal Aid Act.
Court Findings:
The District Court recognized that domestic violence often involves a cycle of control, where the victim is unable to break free from the abuser’s power dynamics.
The court acknowledged the importance of legal aid and victim support services in such cases.
Sentence:
The defendant was sentenced to 1 year imprisonment and ordered to undergo psychological treatment. A protection order was issued for the victim.
Significance:
This case emphasizes the importance of legal aid for victims of domestic violence, particularly for those who may not have the resources or knowledge to navigate the legal system effectively.
Case 5: Court of Appeal Helsinki 2014:17 – Financial Abuse in Domestic Violence
Facts:
The defendant, a man, used financial control to dominate his wife. He withheld money, prevented her from working, and controlled access to financial resources.
The victim filed for divorce and reported financial abuse to the authorities.
Court Findings:
The Court recognized that financial abuse is a critical aspect of coercive control in domestic violence.
The Court ruled that financial manipulation should be treated as a serious form of domestic violence, even though it does not involve physical assault.
Sentence:
The defendant was ordered to pay compensation to the victim for financial damages and was given a community sentence with a restriction on financial decision-making.
Significance:
This case demonstrates how financial abuse can be recognized as a form of domestic violence under Finnish law and the importance of addressing all aspects of abuse within intimate relationships.
IV. Key Takeaways from Finnish Domestic Violence Case Law
Psychological and Emotional Abuse:
Finnish case law shows a growing recognition that psychological abuse, including coercive control, is just as harmful as physical violence and is treated as a criminal offense.
Victim Protection:
The issuance of protection orders plays a critical role in ensuring the safety of victims. The legal framework ensures that victims are protected quickly and effectively from their abusers.
RELATED Blog
comments