Effectiveness Of Dna Profiling In Criminal Cases
1. Understanding DNA Profiling in Criminal Cases
DNA profiling, also known as genetic fingerprinting, is a forensic technique used to identify individuals based on their unique DNA sequences. It has revolutionized criminal investigations by providing scientific evidence linking suspects to crime scenes or victims.
A. Key Features
Individual Specificity: Every person’s DNA (except identical twins) is unique.
Evidence Correlation: DNA from blood, hair, saliva, or other biological samples can be matched to suspects.
Cold Case Solving: Enables solving old cases where physical evidence is preserved.
Exoneration: DNA evidence can also prove innocence in wrongful convictions.
2. Landmark Cases Illustrating DNA Profiling Effectiveness
Case 1: R v. Marsh (1990) – UK
Facts: Two brothers were accused of murder. DNA analysis was used to compare blood samples at the crime scene.
Issue: Could DNA be relied upon to distinguish between genetically similar individuals?
Decision: DNA evidence conclusively identified the perpetrator.
Significance: Demonstrated that DNA profiling could reliably distinguish between close relatives and be used in serious criminal trials.
Case 2: People v. Castro (1989) – USA
Facts: Castro was accused of sexual assault; semen samples from the victim were analyzed.
Issue: Could DNA evidence be admitted and trusted in court?
Decision: The court allowed DNA evidence but emphasized the need for expert testimony on reliability and lab procedures.
Significance: Early US case highlighting the admissibility of DNA evidence and the importance of procedural safeguards.
Case 3: R v. Doheny and Adams (1997) – UK
Facts: DNA found at a crime scene was compared to suspects’ profiles.
Issue: How should the statistical probability of a DNA match be presented to the jury?
Decision: DNA match probability must be explained clearly; high match probability strengthened the prosecution’s case.
Significance: Set standards for presenting statistical weight of DNA evidence in court.
Case 4: State v. Buckland (2003) – USA
Facts: DNA recovered from a rape victim was used to match the accused.
Issue: Could DNA profiling be considered sufficient for conviction?
Decision: Court upheld conviction based primarily on DNA evidence.
Significance: Demonstrated the power of DNA evidence in securing convictions, even when other evidence was limited.
Case 5: R v. Broughton (2004) – UK
Facts: Cold case of a murder from 1970s; DNA from preserved evidence linked the suspect.
Issue: Could decades-old biological evidence reliably identify the perpetrator?
Decision: Court accepted DNA evidence from old samples; suspect convicted.
Significance: Showed DNA profiling’s effectiveness in cold cases, solving crimes years later.
Case 6: The Innocence Project Cases – USA
Facts: Numerous wrongful convictions were overturned using post-conviction DNA testing.
Example: Kirk Bloodsworth, convicted of murder, exonerated through DNA.
Significance: DNA profiling not only helps convict the guilty but exonerates the innocent, proving its reliability and societal value.
Case 7: R v. Weir (2003) – UK
Facts: DNA found on a murder victim’s clothing was matched to the accused.
Issue: Could contamination or lab errors undermine evidence?
Decision: Expert testimony confirmed proper procedures; DNA match used in conviction.
Significance: Highlighted importance of strict lab protocols for DNA evidence to remain credible.
3. Effectiveness of DNA Profiling – Lessons from Cases
High Accuracy: DNA profiling can identify perpetrators with extremely high probability, even in complex cases.
Cold Case Resolution: Cases decades old can now be solved using preserved DNA evidence (Broughton).
Exoneration: DNA evidence has freed wrongfully convicted individuals (Innocence Project).
Statistical Weight: Courts emphasize explaining match probability clearly to avoid misinterpretation (Doheny & Adams).
Reliability Depends on Procedures: Lab protocols, contamination prevention, and expert testimony are critical (Weir).
Limitations: DNA cannot provide motive or time of crime; it is a corroborative tool rather than a standalone explanation.
Summary Table of Cases
| Case | Year | Key Contribution |
|---|---|---|
| R v. Marsh | 1990 | Distinguished close relatives using DNA |
| People v. Castro | 1989 | Early US admissibility of DNA evidence |
| R v. Doheny & Adams | 1997 | Importance of statistical explanation |
| State v. Buckland | 2003 | DNA sufficient for conviction |
| R v. Broughton | 2004 | Cold case resolution using old DNA |
| Innocence Project | 1989–present | Exoneration of wrongfully convicted |
| R v. Weir | 2003 | Importance of lab procedures and credibility |
4. Conclusion
DNA profiling has revolutionized criminal justice:
It strengthens the prosecution’s case by providing scientific certainty.
It solves cold cases and overturns wrongful convictions.
Courts recognize it as highly reliable, but admissibility depends on proper lab procedures, expert testimony, and clear statistical presentation.
DNA profiling is one of the most effective tools in modern criminal investigations, combining forensic science with judicial scrutiny to achieve justice.
RELATED Blog
comments